Skip to main content
Log in

Equivalent decision trees and their associated strategy sets

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the structure of individual decisions under uncertainty in extensive (i.e., decision-tree) form at a sufficient level of generality to encompass many traditional as well as novel criteria of general choice under uncertainty. Considerations both of structure and of strategic effect arise. In § 2 we define weak and strong forms of strategic equivalence of decision trees and describe partial-normalization procedures by which all economically defined complete pure strategies may be identified for the decider and for “chance”. In § 3 we examine characteristics of locally randomized, “behavior” strategies for the decider as the degree of normalization is varied, and we deduce useful properties of the function which specifies an outcome lottery for each behavior strategy of the decider in conjuction with a deterministic or stochastic selection by Chance. In § 4 we list a wide variety of choice criteria which may be invoked within the framework developed here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allais, M.: 1953, ‘Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et Axiomes de l'école Américaine’, Econometrica 21, 503–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. E.: 1982, ‘Regret in decision making under uncertainty’, Oper. Res. 30, 961–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, G.: 1967, Lattice Theory, 3rd ed., American Mathematical Society, Providence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, D. and M. A. Girshick: 1954, Theory of Games and Statistical Decisions, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and W. W. Cooper: 1963, ‘Deterministic equivalents for optimizing and satisficing under chance constraints’, Oper. Res. 11, 18–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S. H.: 1983, ‘A generalization of the quasilinear mean with applications to the measurement of income inequality and decision theory resolving the Allais paradox’, Econometrica 51, 1065–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S. H. and K. R. MacCrimmon: 1979, ‘Alpha-nu choice theory: A generalization of expected utility theory’, Working Paper No. 669, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D.: 1961, ‘Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms’, Quarterly J. Economics 75, 643–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C.: 1971a, ‘A study of lexicographic expected utility’, Management Science 17, 672–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C.: 1971b, ‘One-way expected utility with finite consequence spaces’, Ann. Math. Statist. 42, 572–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C.: 1972, ‘On the foundations of game theory: The case of non-Archimedean utilities’, Internat. J. Game Theory 1, 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C.: 1982, ‘Nontransitive measurable utility’, J. Math. Psychology 26, 31–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C.: 1983a, ‘Transitive measurable utility’, J. Economic Theory 31, 293–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C.: 1983b, ‘Ellsberg revisited: A new look at comparative probability’, Annals of Statistics 11, 1047–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C.: 1984a, ‘SSB utility theory and decision-making under uncertainty’, Math. Social Scis. 8, 253–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C.: 1984b, ‘SSB utility theory: An economic perspective’, Math. Social Scis. 8, 63–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C.: 1984c, ‘Dominance in SSB utility theory’, J. Economic Theory 34, 130–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C.: 1985, ‘Uncertainty aversion and separated effects in decision making under uncertainty’, mimeographed.

  • Fishburn, P. C. and I. H. LaValle: 1986, ‘Context-dependent choice with nonlinear and nontransitive utilities’, mimeographed.

  • Fishburn, P. C. and I. H. LaValle: 1987, ‘A nonlinear, nontransitive and additive-probability model for decisions under uncertainty’, Ann. Statistics (in press).

  • Fishburn, P. C. and R. G. Vickson: 1978, ‘Theoretical foundations of stochastic dominance’, in Stochastic Dominance, edited by G. A. Whitmore and M. C. Findlay, Lexington Books, Lexington, 37–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, A. J., J. G. Morris and H. E. Thompson: 1981, ‘Decision problems under risk and chance-constrained programming: Dilemmas in the transition’, Management Science 27, 698–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. A.: 1968, ‘The foundations of decision analysis’, IEEE Trans. on System Science and Cybernetics, SSC-4, 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L. and R. L. Winkler: 1985, ‘Evaluating decision strategies for equity of public risks’, Oper. Res. 33, 955–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, H. W.: 1953, ‘Extensive games and the problem of information’, in Contributions to the Theory of Games II: Annals of Mathematics Studies, 28, edited by H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 189–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaValle, I. H.: 1978, Fundamentals of Decision Analysis, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaValle, I. H.: 1980, ‘On value and strategic role of information in semi-normalized decisions’, Oper. Res. 28, 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaValle, I. H.: 1986, ‘On the “Bayesability” of chance-constrained programming problems’, Oper. Res. Letters 4, 281–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaValle, I. H. and P. C. Fishburn: 1987, ‘Decision analysis under states additive SSB preferences’, Oper. Res. 35 (in press).

  • LaValle, I. H. and K. R. Wapman: 1986, ‘Rolling back decision trees requires the independence axiom!’, Management Sci. 32, 382–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, G. and R. Sugden: 1982, ‘Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty’, Economic J. 92, 805–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. and H. Raiffa: 1957, Games and Decisions, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M. J.: 1982, ‘“Expected utility” analysis without the independence axiom’, Econometrica 50, 277–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M. J.: 1983, ‘The economic theory of individual behavior toward risk: Theory, evidence, and new directions’, Technical Report No 433, Center for Research on Organizational Efficiency, Stanford University, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern: 1944, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otter, R. and J. Dunne: 1953, ‘Games with equilibrium points’, Proc. Nat. Acad. Scis., U.S.A. 39, 310–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G.: 1982, Game Theory, 2nd ed., Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponssard, J. P.: 1981, Competitive Strategies, North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H.: 1968, Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choice under Uncertainty, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H. and R. O. Schlaifer: 1961, Applied Statistical Decision Theory, Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J.: 1954, The Foundations of Statistics, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D.: 1984, ‘Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity’, Preprint No. 84, Institute for Mathematics and Its Applications, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, M.: 1982, Game Theory in the Social Sciences: Concepts and Solutions, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. L.: 1972, ‘Simplification of games in extensive form’, Internat. J. Game Theory 1, 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lavalle, I.H., Fishburn, P.C. Equivalent decision trees and their associated strategy sets. Theor Decis 23, 37–63 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127336

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127336

Keywords

Navigation