Abstract

Suppose that a group of individual agents meets plausible conditions for collective agency, and that the collective agent thereby constituted performs a harmful action. The collective may be blameworthy for having performed that action, and it may be appropriate that the collective be punished for having performed it. But this raises a difficult question: how to punish collectives. Some have argued that we can’t, because we cannot punish collectives without punishing at least some of their members. I argue that this is not an objection to collective punishment, so long as members are punished in their role as members, rather than in their role as private individuals. I discuss several issues that come up when we think about punishing groups: the forms punishment can permissibly take; the distribution of collective punishment among members; and the relation between this view of collective punishment and the law of joint enterprise.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)
You do not currently have access to this article.