Abstract
The problem for the scientist created by using idealizations is to determine whether failures to achieve experimental fit are attributable to experimental error, falsity of theory, or of idealization. Even in the rare case when experimental fit within experimental error is achieved, the scientist must determine whether this is so because of a true theory and fortuitously canceling idealizations, or due to a fortuitous combination of false theory and false idealizations. For the engineer, the problem seems rather different. Experiment for the engineer reveals the closeness of predictive fit that can be achieved by theory and idealization for a particular case. If the closeness of fit is good enough for some practical purpose, the job is done. If not, or there are reasons to consider variation, then the engineer needs to know how well the experimentally determined closeness of fit will extrapolate to new cases. This paper focuses on engineering measures of closeness of fit and the projectibility of those measures to new cases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agassi, J.: 1966, ‘The Confusion Between Science and Technology in the Standard Philosophies of Science’,Technology and Culture 7, 348–66, reprinted in Rapp, 1974, pp. 40–59
Ammann, O., T. von Karman, and G. Woodruff: 1941, ‘The Failure of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge: A Report to the Honorable John M. Carmody, Administrator, Federal Works Agency’. Reprinted inBulletin of the Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas 15, 1944. There is no overall pagination in this issue of the Bulletin; all page references are to those of the original reports.
Andrew, C., L. Gregory, and R. McMinn: 1938, ‘Report to the Board of Consulting Engineers, The Tacoma Narrows Bridge, to Mr. Lacey V. Murrow, Director of Highways’. Reprinted inBulletin of the Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas 15, 1944.
Baily, F.: 1832, ‘On the Correction of a Pendulum for the Reduction to a Vacuum’,Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, pp. 399–492.
Billington, D.: 1979,Robert Maillart's Bridges, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Cartwright, N.: 1983,How the Laws of Physics Lie, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Condron, T.: 1938, ‘Excerpts from Report of Supervisory Engineer, to Washington Toll Bridge Authority of the State of Washington’. Reprinted inBulletin of the Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas 15, 1944.
Earman, J. and C. Glymour: 1980, ‘Relativity and Eclipses: The British Eclipse Expeditions of 1919 and Their Predecessors’,Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 11, 49–85.
Glymour, Clark: 1980,Theory and Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Hazen, H.: 1934, ‘Theory of Servo-Mechanisms’,Journal of the Franklin Institute 218, 279–331.
Ivanoff, A.: 1934, ‘Theoretical Foundations of the Automatic Regulation of Temperature’,Journal of the Institute of Fuel. London 7, 117–38.
von Kluber, H.: 1960, ‘The Determination of Einstein's Light-Deflection in the Gravitational Field of the Sun’, in Arthur Beer (ed.),Vistas in Astronomy, Vol. III, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 47–77.
Laymon, R.: 1982, ‘Scientific Realism and the Hierarchical Counterfactual Path from Data to Theory’, in P. Asquith and T. Nickles (eds.),PSA 1982 Vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 107–21.
Laymon, R.: 1983, ‘Newton's Demonstration of Universal Gravitation and Philosophical Theories of Confirmation’, in J. Earman (ed.),Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science X, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 179–99.
Laymon, R.: 1985, ‘Idealizations and the Testing of Theories by Experimentation’ in P. Achinstein and O. Hannaway (eds.),Experiment and Observation in Modern Science, MIT Press and Bradford Books, Boston, pp. 147–73.
Laymon, R.: 1987, ‘Using Scott Domains to Explicate the Notions of Approximate and Idealized Data’,Philosophy of Science 54, 194–221.
Laymon, R.: 1989, ‘Idealizations and the Reliability of Dimensional Analysis’, in Paul Durbin (ed.),Research and Development: Philosophical Perspectives on Engineering and Applied Science, Lehigh University Press, Bethlehem, forthcoming.
Layton, E.: 1976, ‘American Ideologies of Science and Engineering’,Technology and Culture 17, 668–701.
Nyquist, H.: 1932, ‘Regeneration Theory’,Bell System Technical Journal 11, 126–47.
Poincare, Henri: 1905, ‘The Principles of Mathematical Physics’, in H. J. Rogers (ed.),Congress of Art and Science Universal Exposition. St. Louis, 1904 Vol. I, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, pp. 604–22.
Poston, T. and I. Stewart: 1978,Catastrophe Theory and Its Applications, Pitman, London.
Poston, T. and A. E. R. Woodcock: 1973, ‘On Zeeman's Catastrophe Machine’,Proceedings Cambridge Philosophical Society 74, 216–66.
Pippard, A., W. Tuplin, and E. McEwen: 1953, ‘Your Reviewer’, ‘Letters to the Editor’,The Engineer 196, 369–70, 465–66, 561. Reprinted in Rapp, 1974, pp. 187–96.
Pippard, A., W. Tuplin, and E. McEwen: 1952,Studies in Elastic Structures. Edward Arnold, London.
Rapp, F. (ed.): 1974,Contributions to a Philosophy of Technology, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Stokes, G.: 1850, ‘On the Effect of the Internal Friction of Fluids on the Motion of Pendulums’,Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 8, 8–145. Reprinted in 1901 with additions inMathematical and Physical Papers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. All page references are to the 1901 edition.
Thurston, R.: 1894,A Manual of the Steam-Engine, John Wiley, New York.
Wimsatt, W. C.: 1981, ‘Reductionistic Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy’, in T. Nickles (ed.),Scientific Discovery: Case Studies, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Zeeman, E. C.: 1972, ‘A Catastrophe Machine’, in C. H. Waddington (ed.),Towards a Theoretical Biology IV, Edinburgh University Press. Edinburgh, pp. 276–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laymon, R. Applying idealized scientific theories to engineering. Synthese 81, 353–371 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869321
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869321