Article contents
Genomic data can illuminate the architecture and evolution of cognitive abilities
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 August 2017
Abstract
Does general intelligence exist across species, and has it been a target of natural selection? These questions can be addressed with genomic data, which can rule out artifacts by demonstrating that distinct cognitive abilities are genetically correlated and thus share a biological substrate. This work has begun with data from humans and can be extended to other species; it should focus not only on general intelligence but also specific capacities like language and spatial ability.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
Chabris, C. F., Lee, J. J., Cesarini, D., Benjamin, D. B. & Laibson, D. I. (2015) The fourth law of behavior genetics. Current Directions in Psychological Science
24:304–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dong, X., Wang, X., Zhang, F. & Tian, W. (2016) Genome-wide identification of regulatory sequences undergoing accelerated evolution in the human genome. Molecular Biology and Evolution
33:2565–75.Google Scholar
Hampshire, A., Highfield, R. R., Parkin, B. L. & Owen, A. M. (2012) Fractionating human intelligence. Neuron
76:1225–37.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. (2002b) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?
Science
298:1569–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, A. C., Berg, B., Eaves, L. J., Solass, M. H., Corey, L. A., Sundet, J. M., Magnus, P. & Nance, W. E. (1985) Nature
314:734–36.Google Scholar
Hurford, J. R. (2007) The origins of meaning: Language in the light of evolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, V. E., Deaner, R. O. & van Schaik, C. P. (2002) Bayesian analysis of rank data with application to primate intelligence experiments. Journal of the American Statistical Association
97(457):8–17.Google Scholar
Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P. & Steiger, J. H. (2013) Creativity and technical innovation: Spatial ability's unique role. Psychological Science
24:1831–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovas, Y. & Plomin, R. (2006) Generalist genes: Implications for the cognitive sciences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences
10:198–203.Google Scholar
Lee, J. J. (2012) Correlation and causation in the study of personality (with discussion). European Journal of Personality
26:372–412.Google Scholar
Lee, J. J. & Chow, C. C. (2013) The causal meaning of Fisher's average effect. Genetics Research
95:89–109.Google Scholar
Lee, J. J. & Kuncel, N. R. (2015) The determinacy and predictive power of common factors. Industrial and Organizational Psychology
8:467–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. J., Vattikuti, S. & Chow, C. C. (2016) Uncovering the genetic architectures of quantitative traits. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
14:28–34.Google Scholar
Loehlin, J. C., Hansell, N. K., Wright, M. J. & Martin, N. G. (2016) Genetic and environmental contributions to cognitive structure in Australian twins: A reappraisal. Intelligence
59:24–31.Google Scholar
Okbay, A., Beauchamp, J. P., Fontana, M. A., Lee, J. J., Pers, T. H., Rietveld, C. A., Turley, P., Chen, G-B., Emilsson, V., Meddens, S.
Fleur, W., Oskarsson, S., Pickrell, J. K., Thom, K., Timshel, P., de Vlaming, R., Abdellaoui, A., Ahluwalia, T. S., Bacelis, J., Baumbach, C., Bjornsdottir, G., Brandsma, J. H., Pin Concas, M., Derringer, J., Furlotte, N. A., Galesloot, T. E., Girotto, G., Gupta, R., Hall, L. M., Harris, S. E., Hofer, E., Horikoshi, M., Huffman, J. E., Kaasik, K., Kalafati, I. P., Karlsson, R., Kong, A., Lahti, J., van der Lee, S. J., deLeeuw, C., Lind, P. A., Liu, T., Mangino, M., Marten, J., Mihailov, E., Miller, M. B., van der Most, P. J.
Oldmeadow, C., Payton, A., Pervjakova, N., Peyrot, W. J.
Qian, Y., Raitakari, O., Rueedi, R., Salvi, E., Schmidt, B., Schraut, K. E., Shi, J., Smith, A. V., Poot, R. A., St Pourcain, B., Teumer, A., Thorleifsson, G., Verweij, N., Vuckovic, D., Wellmann, J., Westra, H.-J., Yang, J., Zhao, W., Zhu, Z., Alizadeh, B. Z., Amin, N., Bakshi, A., Baumeister, S. E., Biino, G., Bønnelykke, K., Boyle, P. A., Campbell, H., Cappuccio, F. P., Davies, G., De Neve, J.-E., Deloukas, P., Demuth, I., Ding, J., Eibich, P., Eisele, L., Eklund, N., Evans, D. M., Faul, J. D., Feitosa, M. F., Forstner, A. J., Gandin, I., Gunnarsson, B., Halldórsson, B. V., Harris, T. B., Heath, A. C., Hocking, L. J., Holliday, E. G., Homuth, G., Horan, M. A., Hottenga, J.-J., de Jager, P. L., Joshi, P. K., Jugessur, A., Kaakinen, M. A., Kähönen, M., Kanoni, S., Keltigangas-Järvinen, L., Kiemeney, L. A. L. M., Kolcic, I., Koskinen, S., Kraja, A. T., Kroh, M., Kutalik, Z., Latvala, A., Launer, L. J., Lebreton, M. P., Levinson, D. F., Lichtenstein, P., Lichtner, P., Liewald, D. C. M.
LifeLines Cohort Study, Loukola, A., Madden, P. A., Mäki-Opas, T., Marioni, R. E., Marques-Vidal, P., Meddens, G. A., McMahon, G., Meisinger, C., Meitinger, T., Milaneschi, Y., Milani, L., Montgomery, G. W., Myhre, R., Nelson, C. P., Nyholt, D. R., Ollier, W. E. R., Palotie, A., Paternoster, L., Pedersen, N. L., Petrovic, K. E., Porteous, D. J., Räkkönen, K., Ring, S. M., Robino, A., Rostapshova, O., Rudan, I., Rustichini, A., Salomaa, V., Sanders, A. R., Sarin, A.-P., Schmidt, H., Scott, R. J., Smith, B. H., Smith, J. A., Staessen, J. A., Steinhagen-Thiessen, E., Strauch, K., Terracciano, A., Tobin, M. D., Ulivi, S., Vaccargiu, S., Quaye, L., van Rooij, F. J. A., Venturini, C., Vinkhuyzen, A. A. E., Völker, U., Völzke, H., Vonk, J. M., Vozzi, D., Waage, J., Ware, E. B., Willemsen, G., Attia, J. R., Bennett, D. A., Berger, K., Bertram, L., Bisgaard, H., Boomsma, D. I., Boreck, I. B., Bültmann, U., Chabris, C. F., Cucca, F., Cusi, D., Deary, I. J., Dedoussis, G. V., van Duijn, C. M., Eriksson, J. G., Franke, B., Franke, L., Gasparini, P., Gejman, P. V., Gieger, C., Grabe, H.-J., Gratten, J., Groenen, P. J. F., Gudnason, V., van der Harst, P., Hayward, C., Hinds, D. A., Hoffmann, W., Hyppönen, E., Iacono, W. G., Jacobsson, B., Järvelin, M.-R., Jöckel, K.-H., Kaprio, J., Kardia, S. L. R., Lehtimäki, T., Lehrer, S. F., Magnusson, P. K. E., Martin, N. G., McGue, M., Metspalu, A., Pendleton, N., Penninx, B. W. J. H., Perola, M., Pirastu, N., Pirastu, M., Polasek, O., Posthuma, D., Power, C., Province, M. A., Samani, N. J., Schlessinger, D., Schmidt, R., Sørensen, T. I. A., Spector, T. D., Stefansson, K., Thorsteinsdottir, U., Thurik, A. R., Timpson, N. J., Tiemeier, H., Tung, J. Y., Uitterlinden, A. G., Vitart, V., Vollenweider, P., Weir, D. R., Wilson, J. F., Wright, A. F., Conley, D. C., Krueger, R. F., Smith, G. D., Hofman, A., Laibson, D. I., Medland, S. E., Meyer, M. N., Yang, J., Johannesson, M., Visscher, P. M., Esko, T., Koillinger, P. D., Cesarini, D. & Benjamin, D. B. (2016) Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment. Nature
533:539–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. & Jackendoff, R. (2005) The faculty of language: What's special about it?
Cognition
95:201–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trzaskowski, M., Davis, O. S. P., DeFries, J. C., Yang, J., Visscher, P. M. & Plomin, R. (2013) DNA evidence for strong genome-wide pleiotropy of cognitive and learning abilities. Behavior Genetics
43:267–73.Google Scholar
van der Sluis, S., Verhage, M., Posthuma, D. & Dolan, C. (2010) Phenotypic complexity, measurement bias, and poor phenotypic resolution contribute to the missing heritability problem in genetic association studies. PLoS One
5:e13929.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by
Target article
The evolution of general intelligence
Related commentaries (28)
G and g: Two markers of a general cognitive ability, or none?
G but not g: In search of the evolutionary continuity of intelligence
A pointer's hypothesis of general intelligence evolved from domain-specific demands
An all-positive correlation matrix is not evidence of domain-general intelligence
Coexistence of general intelligence and specialized modules
Contemporary evolutionary psychology and the evolution of intelligence
Disentangling learning from knowing: Does associative learning ability underlie performances on cognitive test batteries?
Domains of generality
Evolution, brain size, and variations in intelligence
General intelligence does not help us understand cognitive evolution
General intelligence is a source of individual differences between species: Solving an anomaly
General intelligence is an emerging property, not an evolutionary puzzle
Genomic data can illuminate the architecture and evolution of cognitive abilities
Habit formation generates secondary modules that emulate the efficiency of evolved behavior
Hierarchy, multidomain modules, and the evolution of intelligence
It's time to move beyond the “Great Chain of Being”
Negative results are needed to show the specific value of a cultural explanation for g
Of mice and men, nature and nurture, and a few red herrings
Taking a multiple intelligences (MI) perspective
The evolution of analytic thought?
The evolution of fluid intelligence meets formative g
The evolution of general intelligence in all animals and machines
The false dichotomy of domain-specific versus domain-general cognition
Theory of mind: A foundational component of human general intelligence
Understanding the relationship between general intelligence and socio-cognitive abilities in humans
When does cultural transmission favour or instead substitute for general intelligence?
Where is the evidence for general intelligence in nonhuman animals?
“Birdbrains” should not be ignored in studying the evolution of g
Author response
Future directions for studying the evolution of general intelligence