Skip to main content
Log in

The Case of Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) Orders and the Intellectually Disabled Patient

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the case of an intellectually disabled patient, the attending physician was restricted from writing a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) order. Although the rationale for this restriction was to protect the patient from an inappropriate quality of life judgment, it resulted in a worse death than the patient would have experienced had he not been disabled. Such restrictions that are intended to protect intellectually disabled patients may violate their right to equal treatment and to a dignified death.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle. (1941). Politics VII, xvi (in Ross, WD). The basic works of Aristotle. New York, NY: Random House, Inc, p. 1302.

  • Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2009). Principle of biomedical ethics (6th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, P., DuBose, E., Ellingson, S., Guinn, D., & McCurdy, D. (2001). Organizational ethics in health care: Principles, cases & practical solutions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Cantor, N. L. (2009). Making medical decisions for the profoundly mentally disabled. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Dworkin, R. (1985). Rights as trumps. In J. Waldron (Ed.), Theories of rights. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Johnson, M. (2001). A kick in the face says Not Dead Yet. Ragged Edge On-Line. Retrieved June 28, 2011 from http://www.ragged-edge-mag.com/extra/singernh1001.htm.

  • Johnson, M. (2005). After Terri Schiavo: Why the disability rights movement spoke out, why some of us wondered, & where we go from here. Ragged Edge On-Line. Retrieved September 16, 2011 from http://www.ragged-edge-mag.com/focus/postschiavo0405.html.

  • Lifton, J. R. (2000). The Nazi doctors: Medical killing & the psychology of genocide (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.

  • Lilly, C. M., et al. (2000). An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill. The American Journal of Medicine, 109(6), 469–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, D. (1992). Bentham, utilitarianism and distribution. Utilitas, 4(2), 323–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzler, I. (2006). Disability in medieval Europe: Thinking about physical impairment in the high Middle Ages. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michigan Do-Not-Resuscitate Procedure Act, 1996 Public Act 193.

  • Moreno, J. (1993). Whose to choose?: Surrogate decision making in New York state. Hasting Center Report, 23(1), 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J. (2009). The elements of moral philosophy (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

  • Singer, P. (1993). Practical ethics (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • State of Michigan, Opinion No. 7056. Retrieved June 28, 2011 from http://www.ag.state.mi.us/opinion/datafiles/2000s/op10126.htm.

  • Superintendent of Belchertown State Schools v. Saikewicz, 370 N.E. 2d 317, 428 (Mass. 1977).

  • Wolf, S. (1992). Toward a theory of process. Law, Medicine and Healthcare, 20(4), 278–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin G. Leever.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leever, M.G., Richter, K., Nelson, P. et al. The Case of Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) Orders and the Intellectually Disabled Patient. HEC Forum 24, 83–90 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-011-9166-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-011-9166-5

Keywords

Navigation