Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Judgeship of All Citizens: Dworkin’s Protestantism About Law

  • Published:
Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article gives an account of what Ronald Dworkin calls ‘the protestant attitude’ towards law. Dworkin’s protestantist claim that the interpretive attitude towards law is to be taken not only by judges, but also by ordinary citizens is explained and defended. The account of Dworkin’s protestantism about law in this article is not based on his more general protestantist view about the interpretation of social practices, but, rather, on the nature of authoritative statements of the law in Dworkin’s theory of law as integrity. Protestantism is thus shown to be an integral part of the theory of law as integrity. It is also argued in this article that protestantism about law can accommodate the idea that legal deliberation is an authoritative and public process while leaving room for a significant role for citizens in the development of law. Indeed, any plausible theory of law should incorporate protestantism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Win-chiat Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, Wc. The Judgeship of All Citizens: Dworkin’s Protestantism About Law. Law and Philos 34, 23–53 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-013-9200-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-013-9200-7

Keywords

Navigation