Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T02:26:27.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Open Society and Its New Enemies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Han Goo Lee*
Affiliation:
Kyung Hee University, Republic of Korea
*
Han Goo Lee, Kyung Hee University, Raemian Pentaville Apart. 102 Dong 301 Ho, Yeoksam-Ro309, Kangnam-Gu, Seoul 06215, Republic of Korea. Email: turtlee@gmail.com

Abstract

This paper elaborates on two classical theories of “Open Society,” i.e. Henri Bergson's and Karl Popper's. It outlines their differences, qualities, and limits. It provides some suggestions about the new enemies of open society in a globalized world, that these new enemies are identified in fanaticism which appears as religious fundamentalism, closed nationalism and political populism. Open society is characterized by the critical use of reason, freedom and tolerance.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergson, H (1958) Les deux sources de la morale et de la religion [1932]. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Berlin, I (1969) Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hare, RM (1963) Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Huntington, SP (1993) The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3): 2249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato (2017) The Republic (Plato) (Volume 14), CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
Popper, K (1966) The Open Society and its Enemies, vol. I. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
Riker, WH (1982) Liberalism Against Populism. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
Rousseau, JJ (1964) Du contrat social [1762], in Œuvres complètes, iii, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar