Skip to main content
Log in

Two senses for ‘givenness of consciousness’

  • Published:
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The notion of ‘givenness of consciousness’ needs further elucidation. On the one hand, I agree with Lyyra (this volume) that one sense for ‘givenness of consciousness’ is not enough to account for consciousness and self-consciousness. On the other hand, I will argue that Lyyra’s paper is problematic precisely because he fails to consider one basic sense for ‘givenness of consciousness’. Lyyra and I thus agree that there must be (at least) two senses for ‘givenness of consciousness’; we disagree, however about which modes of givenness are involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that here we operated an interesting change in our frame of investigation. The most common question asked when investigating self-consciousness is “who”: who are you conscious of: yourself or not? Here, the framework is different and involves checking whether the “what” question can be asked meaningfully. If yes, then the transitive consciousness at stake may be a form of self-consciousness or not, and asking the “who” question becomes relevant only then. Conversely, if the “what” question cannot be asked meaningfully, then the form of consciousness involved is intransitive and the “who” question is just as irrelevant as the “what” question. Does it mean that at this intransitive level, there is no object and no subject? This is what the detractors of this position seem to think, wrongly, when they qualify this state as an “internal glow”. Obscure notion indeed. Which should not be confused with the form of intransitive self-consciousness at stake here.

  2. despite problems related to such use. For a discussion, see Legrand, D. (2007).

References

  • Legrand, D. (2007). Subjectivity and the body: introducing basic forms of self-consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(3), 577–582. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.06.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyyra, P. (2008). Two senses for ‘givenness of consciousness’. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. doi:10.1007/s11097-008-9110-6.

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Colin Smith Trans. 1962. Routledge Classics. Paris: Tel Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. (2005). Consciousness and mind. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D. (2005). Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person perspective. Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA: The MIT.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorothée Legrand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Legrand, D. Two senses for ‘givenness of consciousness’. Phenom Cogn Sci 8, 89–94 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-008-9116-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-008-9116-0

Keywords

Navigation