Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Common Pitch and The Management of Corporate Relations: Interpretation, Ethics and Managerialism

  • OriginalPaper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines how good management can repair fractured relationships within organisations, addressing problems that if left unattended will threaten the future existence of many of these companies. It analyses why there is a mood for change in management thinking, and what direction that change can take. Part of the challenge is how managers can best satisfy the objectives of corporate social responsibility initiatives, and repair organisational and fractured community relationships. A possible role for management is to examine alternative ways of thinking about the potential benefits for the organisation that can be achieved by enhancing employee relationships. In this regard, this paper offers strategies to examine management’s adverse affects on workers’ life-plans. The art of interpretation is used to expose how bureaucratic logic ignores workers’ rights and potentially damages the corporation’s longevity. Interpretation, as opposed to procedure, suggests that organisations are not simply profit mechanisms, but active and dynamic civil societies. By better understanding the facilitating processes of administrative and management thinking, it is possible that we can develop alternative strategies that empower individuals to circumvent the negative consequences of instrumental rationality and enable them to act more responsibly in the public interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams G. B., Balfour D. L. (1998) Unmasking Administrative Evil. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan J. (2004) The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. Viking Canada, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P., Roth K. (2000) Why Companies go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal 43(4):717–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boggs C. (1986) Social Movements and Political Power. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll A. B. (1979) A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 4:497–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R.: 1970, Descartes Philosophical Letters, translated by Anthony Kenny: Clarendon Press

  • Dietz, J., S. L. Robinson, R. Folger, R. A. Baron and M. Schulz: 2003, ‘The Impact of Community Violence and an Organizational Procedural Justice Climate on Workplace Agression’, Academy of Management Journal 46(3), 317–326

  • Dillard, J. E. and Rochella: 2005, ‘The Rules Are No Game: From Instrumental Rationality to Administrative Evil’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (forthcoming)

  • Dreyfus, H.: 2004, ‘Taylor’s (Anti-) Epistemology’, in R. Abbey (ed.), Charles Taylor, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)

  • Dreyfus H., Dreyfus H. L. (2005) Expertise in Real World Contexts. Organization Studies 26(5):779–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M.: 1981, ‘Governmentality’, in G. Burchell, et al. (ed.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Hemel Hemstead, Harvester Wheatshaft:87–104

  • Fukuyama F. (1995) Trust. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M.: 1962, Being and Time (Harper and Rowe, New York) (trans., J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson)

  • Hobbes, T.: 1975, Leviathan. (2nd. ed.) (ed.). with an Introduction by C. B. Macpherson (Penguin, Harmondsworth, Eng)

  • Hollenbach D. (2002) The Common Good and Christian Ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs M. (1994) The Limits to Neoclassicism: Towards an Institutional Environmental Economics. In: Redclift M., Benton T. (eds), Social Theory and the Global Environment. Routledge, New York, pp. 67–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. (1957) Idea for a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan World View. In: Beck L.W. (eds), On History. Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishing, Indianapolis, pp. 11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M.: 1985, The Change Masters (Simon & Schuster)

  • Kanter R. M. (1994) Change in the Global Economy: An Interview with Rosabeth Moss Kanter. European Management Journal 12 (1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane J. (2003) Global Civil Society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr J. (2004) The Limits of Organizational Democracy. Academy Management Executive 18(3):81–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinicki A. J., Vechio R. P. (1994) Influences on the Quality of Supervisor–Subordinate Relationships: The Role of Time–Pressure, Organizational Commitment, and Locus of Control. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 15(1):75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights D. (1992) Changing Spaces: The Disruptive Impact of a New Epistemological Location for the Study of Management. Academy of Management Review 17(3):514–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P., Lee N. (2005) Corporate Social Responsibility: Best Practices for Doing the Most Good. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman G. (2006) Perspectives on Taylor’s Reconciled Society: Community, Difference and Nature. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32(3):347–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantziaris C. (1999) The Dual View of the Corporation and the Aboriginal Corporation. Federal Law Review 27:283–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis J. D., Walsh J. P. (2003) Misery Uoves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly 48:268–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A.: 1995, ‘The Spectre of Communitarianism’, Radical Philosophy 70, 35

  • McWilliams A., Siegel D. (2000) Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21:603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams A., Siegel D. (2001) Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Reviews 26:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neu D., Warsame H., Pedwell K. (1998). Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23:265–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker M. (1992) Post-Modern Organizations or Postmodern Organizational Theory. Organizational Studies 13(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Purser R. E., Cabana S. (1998) The Self-Managing Organization: How Leading Companies are Transforming the Work of Teams for Real Impact. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarter J. (2000) Beyond the Bottom Line: Socially Innovative Business Owners. Quorum, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan M. C. (1998) Corporate Speech and Civic Virtue. In: Allen A. L., Regan M. C. (eds), Debating Democracy’s Discontent: Essays On American Politics, Law and Public Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinon S. L., Rousseau D. M. (1994) Violating the Psychological Contract: Not the Exception but the Norm. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 15(4):245–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy A. (2001) Power Politics. South End Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagie A., Koslowsky M. (1994) Organizational Attitudes and Behaviors as a Function of Participation in Strategic and Tactical Change Decisions: An Application of Path – Goal Theory. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 15(1):37–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel M. (1996) Democracy and Its Discontents. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuerman W. E. (1999) Economic Globalization and the Rule of Law. Constellations 6(1):3–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shotter J. (2005) Inside the Moment of Managing: Wittgenstein and the Everyday Dynamics of Our Expressive-Responsive Activities. Organization Studies 26(1):113–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer P. (1983) Hegel: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1975) Hegel. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1976) Responsibility of Self. In: Rorty A. O. (eds), The Identity of Persons. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 298–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1978) Politics of the Steady State. New Universities Quarterly 32(2):157–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1986) Dialektik heute, oder: Strukturen der Selbstnegation. In: Henrich D. (eds), Hegel”s Wissenchaft der Logik: Formation und Rekonstruktion. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart, pp. 141–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1990a). Modes of Civil Society. Public Culture 3(1):95–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1990b). Irreducibly Social Goods. In: Brennan G., Walsh C. (eds), Rationality, Individualism and Public Policy. Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations, The Australian National University, Canberra, pp. 45–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1991a). Language and Society. In: Honneth A., Joas H. (eds), Communicative Action. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 23–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1991b). The Dialogical Self. In: Hiley D. R., Bohman J. F., Shusterman R. (eds), The Interpretative Turn. Cornell Press, Ithaca, pp. 304–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1991c). Civil Society in the Western Tradition. In Groffier E., Paradis M. (eds), The Notion of Tolerance and Human Rights. Carleton University Press, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1992) The Ethics of Authenticity. Oxford University, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1994). Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition: Examining the Politics of Recognition. In: Gutmann A. (eds) Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, expanded 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1999) Comment on Jurgen Habermas’ ‘From Kant to Hegel and Back Again’. European Journal of Philosophy 7(2):158–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C.: 2001a, ‘On Social Imaginary’, Contemporary Sociological Theory, http://www.nyu.edu/classes/calhoun/Theory/Taylor-on-si.htm

  • Taylor C. (2001b). A Tension in Modern Democracy. In: Botwinick A., Conolly W. (eds), Democracy and Vision. Princeton University Press,Princeton and Oxford, pp 79–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C.: 2002a, On Social Imaginary. [WWW page], URL http://www.nyu.edu/classes/calhoun/Theory/Taylor-on-si.htm

  • Taylor C. (1991c). Civil Society in the Western Tradition. In Groffier E., Paradis M. (eds), The Notion of Tolerance and Human Rights. Carleton University Press, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (2002c). Varieties of Religion Today. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (2003). Ethics and Ontology. Journal of Philosophy C(6):305–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Townley B. Cooper D. J., Oakes L. (2003) Performance Measures and the Rationalisation of the Organisation. Organization Studies 24(7):1045–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townley B. (2004) Managerial Technologies, Ethics & Managing. Human Relations 57(7):893–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño L. K., Weaver G. R. (1999) The Stakeholder Research Tradition: Converging Theorists – Not Convergent Theory. Academy of Management Review 24(2):222–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trilling L. (1971) Sincerity and Authenticity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Voltaire, (1764) Dictionnaire Philosophique. Self-Love

  • Wilson, James Q.: 1993, The Moral Sense (Free Press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glen Lehman.

Additional information

Glen Lehman is Associate Professor, School of Commerce University of South Australia. He has published articles in Philosophy and Social Criticism Accounting, organization and society as well as Critical Perspective on Accounting.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehman, G. A Common Pitch and The Management of Corporate Relations: Interpretation, Ethics and Managerialism. J Bus Ethics 71, 161–178 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9132-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9132-3

Key words

Navigation