Skip to main content
Log in

Psychiatry, language and freedom

  • Psychiatry and Freedom
  • Published:
Metamedicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For political reasons, the social control functions of psychiatry are not openly recognized as such but are disguised as benevolent medical treatment. The roots of this disguise may be traced to the political revolutions in which the rule of man was replaced by the rule of law. This transformation generated a conflict between the desire for freedom under law and the desire for a greater degree of social control than is provided by law. Involuntary mental hospitalization is the neurotic resolution of this conflict by society. The social control functions of psychiatry are disguised and justified by the medical model which describes the moral action of both psychiatrist and patient in the ostensibly value neutral language of science and medicine. The cost of this disguise is great. It negates individuals as moral agents and obscures the moral nature of the problems that psychiatrists seek to understand which, in turn, handicaps them in helping the persons they seek to assist. The task of the philosopher in this situation is honestly and critically to analyze and evaluate psychiatric language, psychiatric practices and the moral issues involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Engel, G., ‘The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine’,Science 196 (1977), 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M.,Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in an Age of Reason (1961), Random House, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, R., ‘Social influences on psychiatric thought’,The Pharos 30 (1966), 93–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, R., ‘Involuntary psychiatric commitment as a neurotic symptom’,Existential Psychiatry 6 (1967).

  • Leifer, R.,In the Name of Mental Health: The Social Functions of Psychiatry, Science House, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, R., ‘The medical model as ideology’,International Journal of Psychiatry 9 (1970), 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louch, A. R.,Explanation and Human Action, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K.,Ideology and Utopia (1929), Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., New York, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.,Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.,The Concept of Mind, Barnes and Noble, New York, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. S.,Pain and Pleasure: A Study of Bodily Feelings, Basic Books, New York, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. S.,The Myth of Mental Illness, Hoeber-Harper, New York, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. S.,Law, Liberty and Psychiatry, Macmillan, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. S.,Schizophrenia, Basic Books, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, P.,The Idea of a Social Science, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, L., Preface toIdeology and Utopia of Karl Mannheim, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leifer, R. Psychiatry, language and freedom. Metamedicine 3, 397–416 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00900940

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00900940

Key words

Navigation