Abstract
This paper discerns two types of mathematization, a foundational and an explorative one. The foundational perspective is well-established, but we argue that the explorative type is essential when approaching the problem of applicability and how it influences our conception of mathematics. The first part of the paper argues that a philosophical transformation made explorative mathematization possible. This transformation took place in early modernity when sense acquired partial independence from reference. The second part of the paper discusses a series of examples from the history of mathematics that highlight the complementary nature of the foundational and exploratory types of mathematization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The systematic connections between conceptions of logic and axiomatics have been investigated in Lenhard and Otte (2010).
References
Antonelli, A., & May, R. C. (2000). Frege’s new science. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 41(3), 242–270.
Bachelard, G. (1938). La formation de l’esprit scientifique. Paris: Vrin.
Bangu, S. (2012). The applicability of mathematics in science: Indispensability and ontology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Benacerraf, P. (1965). What numbers could not be. Philosophical Review, 74, 47–73.
Berkeley, G. (1901). Alciphron, or the minute philosopher. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Berkeley, G. (1989). Philosophical works. London: Everyman’s Library.
Boutroux, P. (1920). L’Ideal scientifique des mathematiciens. Paris: Alcan.
Bradley, R. E., & Sandifer, C. E. (2009). Cauchy’s cours d’analyse algebrique (An Annotated Translation). NY: Springer.
Cassirer, E. (1953). Substance and function (originally 1910 in German). New York: Dover.
Cassirer, E. (1969). The problem of knowledge: Philosophy, science, and history since hegel (5th ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
De Toledo Piza, A. (2003). Heisenberg and Schrödinger. Sao Paulo: Odysseus.
Dedekind, R. (1963). Essays on the theory of numbers. New York: Dover.
Dirac, P. (1966). Lectures on quantum mechanics. New York: Dover.
Engel, F. (Ed.) (1894). Hermann Grassmanns gesammelte mathematische und physikalische Werke. Leipzig: Teubner.
Euler, L. (1748/1983). Einleitung in die Analysis des Unendlichen (Introductio in Analysin Infinitorum) (Vol. I.). Heidelberg: Springer.
Foucault, M. (1973). The order of things. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Frege, G. (1884). The foundation of arithmetic. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Frege, G. (1892). On sense and reference. In P. Geach, & M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 56–78. Cited according to Moore, G. W. (1993), Meaning and Reference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frege, G. (1956). The thought: A logical inquiry. Mind, 65(259), 289–311. (Original publication “Der Gedanke: Eine logische Untersuchung”, in: Beiträge zur Philosophie des Deutschen Idealismus, I, 58–77, 1918).
Frege, G. (1980). Philosophical and mathematical correspondence. In G. Gabriel, & McGuinness (Eds.), Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Frege, G. (1986). Logische Untersuchungen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck+Ruprecht.
Galileo, G. (1954). Dialogues concerning two new sciences. New York: Dover.
Geach, P., & Black, M. (1970). Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Heijenoort, Jv. (1967). Logic as calculus and logic as language. Synthese, 17, 324–330.
Heisenberg, W. (1971a). Physics and beyond: Encounters and conversations. New York: Harper and Row.
Heisenberg, W. (1971b). Schritte über Grenzen. München: Piper.
Heisenberg, W. (1974). Across the frontiers. New York: Harper and Row.
Hersh, R. (1997). What is mathematics really?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hintikka, J. (1997). Lingua Universalis vs. calculus ratiocinator, Selected Papers (Vol. 2). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Jesseph, D. J. (1993). Berkeley’s philosophy of mathematics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kant, I. (1787). Critique of pure reason (“B” refers to pagination of second edition from 1787), P. Guyer (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998.
Katz, J. (2004). Sense, reference, and philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klein, J. (1968). Greek mathematical thought and the origin of algebra. New York: Dover.
Leibniz, G. W. (1989). Meditations on knowledge, truth, and ideas (1684). In Ariew, R., & Garber, D. (Eds.), Philosophical essays (pp. 23–27). Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis.
Lenhard, J., & Carrier, M. (Eds.) (2017). Mathematics as a tool. Tracing new roles of mathematics in the sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science 327, New York: Springer.
Lenhard, J., & Otte, M. (2010). Two types of mathematization. In B. Van Kerkhove, J. De Vuyst, & J. P. Van Bendegem (Eds.), Philosophical perspectives on mathematical practice (pp. 301–330). London: College Publications.
Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding. Edited with an introduction, critical apparatus and glossary by Peter H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon.
McGinn, C. (2000). Logical properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nersessian, N. J. (1999). Model-based reasoning in conceptual change. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 5–22). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Peirce, Ch. S., Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volumes I–VI, ed. by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiß, Cambridge, Mass. (Harvard UP) 1931–1935, Volumes VII-VIII, ed. by Arthur W. Burks, Cambridge, Mass. (Harvard UP) 1958 (quoted by no. of volume and paragraph).
Pincock, C. (2012). Mathematics and scientific representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reichenbach, H. (1951). The rise of scientific philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Roberts, J. R. (2007). A metaphysics for the mob: The philosophy of George Berkeley. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Russell, B. (1956). Introduction to mathematical philosophy. London: Routledge.
Schüling, H. (1969). Die Geschichte der axiomatischen Methode im 16. und beginnenden 17. Jahrhundert. Hildesheim: Olms-Verlag.
Seboek, Th. (1990). Indexicality. The American Journal for Semiotics, 7, 7–28.
Steiner, M. (1998). The applicability of mathematics as a philosophical problem. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Waismann, F. (1970). Einführung in das mathematische Denken (3rd ed., originally published 1936). München: DTV.
Weinberg, St. (2017). The trouble with quantum mechanics. The New York Review of Books, LXIV(1), 51–53.
Winkler, K. (1994). Berkeley. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lenhard, J., Otte, M. The Applicability of Mathematics as a Philosophical Problem: Mathematization as Exploration. Found Sci 23, 719–737 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-018-9546-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-018-9546-2