Skip to main content
Log in

A Tissue-Level Electromechanical Model of the Left Ventricle: Application to the Analysis of Intraventricular Pressure

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ventricular pressure profile is characteristic of the cardiac contraction progress and is useful to evaluate the cardiac performance. In this contribution, a tissue-level electromechanical model of the left ventricle is proposed, to assist the interpretation of left ventricular pressure waveforms. The left ventricle has been modeled as an ellipsoid composed of twelve mechano-hydraulic sub-systems. The asynchronous contraction of these twelve myocardial segments has been represented in order to reproduce a realistic pressure profiles. To take into account the different energy domains involved, the tissue-level scale and to facilitate the building of a modular model, multiple formalisms have been used: Bond Graph formalism for the mechano-hydraulic aspects and cellular automata for the electrical activation. An experimental protocol has been defined to acquire ventricular pressure signals from three pigs, with different afterload conditions. Evolutionary Algorithms have been used to identify the model parameters in order to minimize the error between experimental and simulated ventricular pressure signals. Simulation results show that the model is able to reproduce experimental ventricular pressure. In addition, electro-mechanical activation times have been determined in the identification process. For example, the maximum electrical activation time is reached, respectively, 96.5, 139.3 and 131.5 ms for the first, second, and third pigs. These preliminary results are encouraging for the application of the model on non-invasive data like ECG, arterial pressure or myocardial strain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Back L (1977) Left ventricular wall and fluid dynamics of cardiac contraction. Math Biosci 36:257–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardou AL, Auger PM, Birkui PJ, Chasse JL (1996) Modeling of cardiac electrophysiological mechanisms: from action potential genesis to its propagation in myocardium. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 24(2–3):141–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovendeerd PH, Borsje P, Arts T, van De Vosse FN (2006) Dependence of intramyocardial pressure and coronary flow on ventricular loading and contractility: a model study. Ann Biomed Eng 34(12):1833–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry HRBB, Findley T (1996) Stresses and strains in the passive left ventricle. Journal of Biological Systems 4:535–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Zuccarini VA (2003) Etude des conditions d’efficacité du ventricule gauche par optimisation téléonomique d’un model de son fonctionnement. Lille

  • Durrer D, van Dam RT, Freud GE, Janse MJ, Meijler FL, Arzbaecher RC (1970) Total excitation of the isolated human heart. Circulation 41(6):899–912

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarini M, Urzua J, Cipriano A, Gonzalez W (1998) Estimation of cardiac function from computer analysis of the arterial pressure waveform. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 45(12):1420–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez AI (2000) Fusion de signaux et de modèles pour la caractérisation d’arythmies cardiaques. Rennes

  • Hernandez AI, Carrault G, Mora F, Bardou A (2002) Model-based interpretation of cardiac beats by evolutionary algorithms: signal and model interaction. Artif Intell Med 26(3):211–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirabayashi S, Inagaki M, Hisada T (2008) Effects of wall stress on the dynamics of ventricular fibrillation: a simulation study using a dynamic mechanoelectric model of ventricular tissue. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol

  • Humphrey JD, Strumpf RK, Yin FC (1990) Determination of a constitutive relation for passive myocardium: II. Parameter estimation. J Biomech Eng 112(3):340–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter PJ (1995) Myocardial constitutive laws for continuum mechanics models of the heart. Adv Exp Med Biol 382:303–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerckhoffs RC, Bovendeerd PH, Kotte JC, Prinzen FW, Smits K, Arts T (2003a) Homogeneity of cardiac contraction despite physiological asynchrony of depolarization: a model study. Ann Biomed Eng 31(5):536–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerckhoffs RC, Faris OP, Bovendeerd PH, Prinzen FW, Smits K, McVeigh ER, Arts T (2003b) Timing of depolarization and contraction in the paced canine left ventricle: model and experiment. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 14(10 Suppl):S188–S195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerckhoffs RC, Neal ML, Gu Q, Bassingthwaighte JB, Omens JH, McCulloch AD (2007) Coupling of a 3D finite element model of cardiac ventricular mechanics to lumped systems models of the systemic and pulmonic circulation. Ann Biomed Eng 35(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Rolle V, Hernandez AI, Richard PY, Buisson J, Carrault G (2005) A bond graph model of the cardiovascular system. Acta Biotheor 53:295–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Rolle V, Hernández AI, Richard P-Y, Carrault G (2008) An autonomic nervous system model applied to the analysis of orthostatic tests. Model Simul Eng 2008, Article ID 427926

  • LeFèvre JLL, Couteiro B (1999) A bond graph model of chemo-mechanical transduction in the mammalian left ventricle. Simulation Practice and Theory 7:531–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo CH, Rudy Y (1994) A dynamic model of the cardiac ventricular action potential. II. Afterdepolarizations, triggered activity, and potentiation. Circ Res 74(6):1097–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalewicz Z (1994) Genetic algorithms ± data structures = evolution programs. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash M (1998) Mechanics and material properties of the heart using an anatomically accurate mathematical model. Auckland

  • Nickerson D, Smith N, Hunter P (2005) New developments in a strongly coupled cardiac electromechanical model. Europace 7(Suppl 2):118–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palladino JL, Noordergraaf A (2002) A paradigm for quantifying ventricular contraction. Cell Mol Biol Lett 7(2):331–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice JJ, Jafri MS, Winslow RL (2000) Modeling short-term interval-force relations in cardiac muscle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278(3):H913–H931

    Google Scholar 

  • Shim EB, Jun HM, Leem CH, Matusuoka S, Noma A (2008) A new integrated method for analyzing heart mechanics using a cell-hemodynamics-autonomic nerve control coupled model of the cardiovascular system. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 96(1–3):44–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva CE, Ferreira LD, Peixoto LB, Monaco CG, Gil MA, Ortiz J (2002) Study of the myocardial contraction and relaxation velocities through Doppler tissue imaging echocardiography: A new alternative in the assessment of the segmental ventricular function. Arq Bras Cardiol 78(2):200–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeter DD (1979) Gross morphology and fiber geometry in the heart, in handbook of physiology vol 1: the cardiovascular system

  • Taber LA, Yang M, Podszus WW (1996) Mechanics of ventricular torsion. J Biomech 29(6):745–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Tusscher KH, Noble D, Noble PJ, Panfilov AV (2004) A model for human ventricular tissue. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 286(4):H1573–H1589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ursino M, Magosso E (2000) Acute cardiovascular response to isocapnic hypoxia. I. A mathematical model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 279(1):H149–H165

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdonck PR, Vierendeels JA (2002) Fluid-structure interaction modelling of left ventricular filling. International conference on computational science 275–284

  • Wong AY (1973) Myocardial mechanics: application of sliding-filament theory to isovolumic concentration of the left ventricle. J Biomech 6(5):565–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The pig experiments were supported by a grant (#6654-01) awarded to Dr. Durand by the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada. The authors would like to thank Mr Daniel Lavigne for his contribution in the set-up of the animal experiments and for the recording of the physiological signals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virginie Le Rolle.

Appendices

Appendix A

1.1 The Bond Graph Formalism

The Bond Graph (BG) formalism is a diagram-based method that is particularly powerful for representation of multi-energy systems, since it is based on the representation of power exchanges; the terminology, the rules, and the construction of Bond Graph models are the same for all energy domains. For example, in the mechanical domain, the effort variable e is the force and the flow variable f is the rate; whereas, in the hydraulic domain, the effort variable e is the pressure and the flow variable f represents flow. The power is the product of the effort and the flow: P = e·f. The elements of the Bond Graph language can be classified as:

1.2 Passive Elements: R, C and I

  • Resistive element (R):

The resistive element R is used to describe dissipative phenomena and can represent electrical resistors, dashpots or plugs in fluid lines.

  • Capacitive element (C):

The capacitive element C is used to describe energy storage and can represent springs or electrical capacitors.

  • Inertial element (I):

The inertial element I is used to model inductance effects in electrical systems and mass or inertia effects in mechanical or fluid systems.

1.3 Active Elements: Se and Sf

An effort source is an element that produces an effort independently of the flow, and a flow source an element that produces flow independently of the effort.

1.4 Junction Elements: 0, 1, TF, GY

  • 0 junction:

The 0 junction is characterized by the equality of the efforts on all its links, while the corresponding flows sum up to zero, if power orientations are taken positive toward the junction.

  • 1 junction:

1 junction is characterized by the equality of the flows on all its links, and the corresponding efforts sum up to zero with the same power orientations.

  • Transformer (TF):

The transformer TF conserves power and transmits the factors of power with scaling defined by the transformer modulus. It can represent an ideal electrical transformer or a mass-less lever.

  • Gyrator (GY):

A gyrator establishes a relationship between flow to effort and effort to flow and conserves power. It can represent a mechanical gyroscope or an electrical dc motor.

The Bond Graph formalism can be particularly useful for modelling physiological systems which often include various energy domains. For example, models of the vascular system (LeFèvre and Couteiro 1999; Diaz-Zuccarini 2003) are especially interesting since they take into account different energy phenomena (hydraulic, mechanic, chemical…).

Appendix B

2.1 Parameter Values

Some model Parameters values are not determined by the identification algorithm. They are taken from the literature.

See Table 1

Table 1  

Appendix C

3.1 Identified Parameter Values

See Table 2

Table 2  

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Le Rolle, V., Carrault, G., Richard, PY. et al. A Tissue-Level Electromechanical Model of the Left Ventricle: Application to the Analysis of Intraventricular Pressure. Acta Biotheor 57, 457–478 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-009-9092-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-009-9092-y

Keywords

Navigation