Abstract
Beyond impressionistic observations, little is known about the role and influence of scientific societies on research conduct. Acknowledging that the influence of scientific societies is not easily disentangled from other factors that shape norms and practices, this article addresses how best to study the promotion of research integrity generally as well as the role and impact of scientific societies as part of that process. In setting forth the parameters of a research agenda, the article addresses four issues: (1) how to conceptualize research on scientific societies and research integrity; (2) challenges and complexities in undertaking basic research; (3) strategies for undertaking basic research that is attentive to individual, situational, organizational, and environmental levels of analysis; and (4) the need for evaluation research as integral to programmatic change and to assessment of the impact of activities by scientific societies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Steneck, Nicholas H. (2000) Assessing the integrity of publicly funded research, in Steneck, N. & Scheetz, M. eds. Investigating research integrity: Proceedings of the first ORI research conference on research integrity November 2000. Office of Research Integrity, DHHS, Washington, DC: 1–16.
Office of Research Integrity (2001) Seven studies funded by research integrity program, ORI Newsletter 9 (4): 1, 4.
Department of Health & Human Services (2000) Statement of organization, functions, and delegations of authority, Federal Register 65: 30600–30601.
Merton, Robert K. (1973) The normative structure of science, in: Merton, R.K., ed.: The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. (First published in Merton, Robert K. [1942] Science and technology in a democratic order, Journal of Legal and Political Sociology 1: 115–126.)
Zuckerman, Harriet (1988) The sociology of science, in: Smelser, N.J. ed. Handbook of Sociology, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
Friedson, Eliot (1986) Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Lodahl, Janice Beyer and Gordon, Gerald (1972) The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments, American Sociological Review 37 (1): 57–72.
Anderson, Melissa S.; Louis, Karen Seashore; and Earle, Jason (1994) Disciplinary and departmental effects on observations of faculty and graduate student misconduct, Journal of Higher Education 65 (3): 331–350.
Babchuk, Nicholas; Keith, Bruce; and Peters, George (1999) Collaboration in sociology and other scientific disciplines, The American Sociologist 30 (3): 5–21.
Campbell, Donald T. (1969) Reforms as experiments, American Psychologist 24 (4): 409–429.
Cook, Thomas D. and Campbell, D. T. (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Rand McNally, Chicago, IL.
Rossi, Peter H., Freeman, Howard E., and Lipsey, Mark W. (1999) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (6th Edition), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This topic was initially discussed at the AAAS-Office of Research Integrity (ORI) meeting in Washington DC on the theme: “The Role and Activities of Scientific Societies in Promoting Research Integrity” held on April 10–11, 2000.
Joyce Miller Iutcovich, PhD, is President of the Keystone University Research Corporation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levine, F.J., Iutcovich, J.M. Challenges in studying the effects of scientific societies on research integrity. SCI ENG ETHICS 9, 257–268 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0012-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0012-2