Skip to main content
Log in

Enough Comparing! Addiction is Its own Thing. Reply to Matthews

  • Letter
  • Published:
Neuroethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 25 March 2017

Abstract

Both Matthews and I see addiction as the outcome of developmental processes that arrive at diverse levels of dysfunction for different individuals at different stages. Matthews characterizes "late-stage" addiction in terms of lost control and extreme automaticity, a degree of dysfunction he calls a "disorder" and compares to another disorder -- depersonalization. I don't mind the label "disorder." Yet addiction is no more like depersonalization than it is like other conditions, most notably obsessive-compulsive disorder. Automaticity is never pure or total. My dual focus on the phenomenology and neuroscience of addiction has helped me capture these critical details and differences. In fact, I think we've had enough of comparing, classifying, and defining addiction. It's time to recognize addiction as a thing in itself, unlike anything else.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Matthews, Steve. 2017. Chronic automaticity in addiction: Why extreme addiction is a disorder. Neuroethics 10.

  2. Lewis, Marc D. 2015. The biology of desire. Why addiction is not a disease. New York: PublicAffairs.

  3. Brand, Matthias, Kimberly S. Young, and Christian Laier. 2014. Prefrontal control and internet addiction: A theoretical model and review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 1–13. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Montag, Christian, Cornelia Sindermann, Benjamin Becker, and Jaak Panksepp. 2016. An affective neuroscience framework for the molecular study of internet addiction. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1906. doi:10.3389/FPSYG.2016.01906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Flanagan, Owen. 2017. Addiction Doesn’t exist, but it is bad for you. Neuroethics 10. Neuroethics. doi:10.1007/s12152-016-9298-z.

  6. Potenza, Marc Nicholas, Lorrin Michael Koran, and Stefano Pallanti. 2009. The relationship between impulse-control disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A current understanding and future research directions. Psychiatry Research 170: 22–31. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2008.06.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Everitt, Barry J., and Trevor W. Robbins. 2016. Drug addiction: Updating actions to habits to compulsions ten years on. Annual Review of Psychology 67: 23–50. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berridge, K.C., T.E. Robinson, and J.W. Aldridge. 2009. Dissecting components of reward: “liking”, “wanting”, and learning. Current Opinion in Pharmacology 9: 65–73. doi:10.1016/j.coph.2008.12.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Henden, Edmund, and Olav Gjelsvik. 2017. What is wrong with the brains of addicts? Neuroethics 10. Neuroethics. doi:10.1007/s12152-016-9285-4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fenton, Ted, and Reinout W. Wiers. 2017. Free will, black swans and addiction. Neuroethics 10. Neuroethics. doi:10.1007/s12152-016-9290-7.

  11. Snoek, Anke. 2017. How to recover from a brain disease: Is addiction a disease, or is there a disease-like stage in addiction? Neuroethics 10. doi:10.1007/s12152-017-9312-0.

  12. Satel, Sally L., and Scott O. Lilienfeld. 2017. If addiction is not best conceptualized a brain disease, then what kind of disease is it? Neuroethics 10. Neuroethics. doi:10.1007/s12152-016-9287-2.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis, Marc D. 2017. Addiction and the Brain: Development, not Disease. Neuroethics 10. Neuroethics. doi:10.1007/s12152-016-9293-4.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Lewis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lewis, M. Enough Comparing! Addiction is Its own Thing. Reply to Matthews. Neuroethics 10, 211–214 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-017-9318-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-017-9318-7

Keywords

Navigation