Abstract
Following the presentation of 36 words, one at a time, a distractor-free test of word recognition (a single-item test trial in which the 36 targets were presented prior to the 36 distractors) or a traditional target-distractor discrimination test (a single-item test trial in which the 36 targets and 36 distractors were randomly ordered) was given to 137 college students. Contrary to the long-standing assumption that distractors are necessary in tests of recognition in order “to keep the subject honest,” the distractor-free test resulted in recognition performance (hits and serial-position frequency patterns) almost identical with that of the conventional discrimination test for high-, medium-, and low-frequency words. For the low-frequency words (words presumed to be unfamiliar to the subjects), false recognitions were fewer under the distractor-free test than under the discrimination test.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1976). The psychology of memory. New York: Basic Books.
Crowder, R. G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dean, J., & Ley, R. (1977). Effects of associative encoding on free recall in high and low verbal associators. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 3, 316–324.
Klatzky, R. L. (1975). Human memory: Structures and processes. San Francisco: Freeman.
Klatzky, R. L. (1975). Human memory: Structures and processes. San Francisco: Freeman.
Ley, R. (1968). Associative reaction time, meaningfulness, and presentation rate in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 285–291.
Ley, R. (1977). Encoding specificity and unidirectional associates in cued recall. Memory & Cognition, 5, 523–528.
Ley, R., & Dean, J. (1973). Effects of associative reaction time and meaningfulness in free recall of mixed and unmixed lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 220–222.
Ley, R., & Karker, J. (1982). A comparison of three methods of measuring recognition memory in high and low academic achievers. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 11–14.
Ley, R., & Tesiny, E. (1975). Associative reaction time, meaningfulness, and pronunciability ratings of 382 words and paralogs. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 645–648.
Mandler, G., Goodman, G., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1982). The word-frequency paradox in recognition. Memory & Cognition, 10, 33–42.
Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. (1944). Teachers’word book of thirty thousand words. New York: Columbia University Teachers’ College.
Tulving, E., & Watktns, M. J. (1973). Continuity between recall and recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 86, 739–748.
Underwood, B. J. (1972). Word recognition memory and frequency information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 276–283.
Wallace, W. P. (1978). Recognition failure of recallable words and recognizable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 441–452.
Wallace, W. P. (1980). On the use of distractors for testing recognition memory. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 696–704.
Wallace, W. P., Sawyer, T. J., & Robertson, L. C. (1978). Distractors in recall, distractor-free recognition, and the word-frequency effect. American Journal of Psychology, 91, 295–304.
Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ley, R., Long, K. A distractor-free test of recognition and false recognition. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 25, 411–414 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334727
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334727