Abstract
Rotation in a general relativistic framework is examined. This concept, combined with the appropriate mechanical work concept, is used to show how the Euclidean group of transformations, serving as an invariance requirement associated with the principle of objectivity, can lead to erroneous conclusions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. A. Truesdell and W. Moll,in Encyclopedia of Physics, Vol. III/3 (Springer-Verlag, 1965).
A. E. Green and R. S. Rivlin,Zamp 15, 290 (1964).
A. E. Green and P. M. Naghdi,Int. J. Engrg. Sci. 6, 621 (1965).
G. Lianis,Nuovo Cimento 14B, 57 (1973).
R. A. Grot and A. C. Eringen,Int. J. Engrg. Sci. 4, 611 (1966).
C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation (W. H. Freeman and Co., 1973).
J. L. Synge,Relativity: The General Theory (North-Holland, 1960).
H. P. Robertson and T. W. Noonan,Relativity and Cosmology (W. B. Saunders, 1968).
I. Muller,Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 45, 241 (1972).
D. Edelen and J. McLennan,Int. J. Engrg. Sci. 11, 813, (1973).
R. J. Atkin and N. Fox,Zamp 24, 853 (1973).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by the U. S. National Science Foundation under Grant ENG-73-03723-A01 to Purdue University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lianis, G., Papastavridis, J.G. Rotating frames and continuum mechanics: A relativistic appraisal. Found Phys 9, 673–694 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00711103
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00711103