Skip to main content
Log in

Re-envisioning property

  • Article
  • Published:
Contemporary Political Theory Aims and scope

Abstract

In our commonplace understanding of property, the “right to exclude” is seen as its central and defining feature: to own is to exclude. This paper examines the cost, to conceptual and normative clarity, of this understanding. First, I argue that the right not to be excluded is a crucial if overlooked element not simply of liberal understandings of ownership, but even of the right to exclude itself. Second, I argue that our neglect of the right not to be excluded severely undermines the clarity and precision with which matters of ownership are debated within both contemporary politics and political philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anton, A., Fisk, M. and Holmström, N. (eds.) (2000) Not for Sale: In Defense of Public Goods. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (2006) In: B. Davies and B. Leftow (eds.) Summa Theologiae: Questions on God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1998) Politics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, J. (1606) The Six Bookes of a Common-Weale. VVritten by I. Bodin a Famous Lawyer, and a Man of Great Experience in Matters of State. Out of the French and Latine Copies, Done into English, by Richard Knolles. Early English Books, 1475–1640/1476:04. London: [Printed by Adam Islip] impensis G. Bishop, 1606.

  • Cohen, G.A. (1979) Capitalism, freedom, and the proletariat. In: A. Ryan (ed.) The Idea of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G.A. (2011) In: M. Otsuka (ed.) On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D.H. and Ostrom, E. (eds.) (2012) Property in Land and Other Resources. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, M. (1996) Health care as a public good. Journal of Social Philosophy 27(3): 14–40. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.1996.tb00250.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. (1994) Children as public goods. American Economic Review 84(2): 86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyfogle, E.T. (2007) On Private Property: Finding Common Ground on the Ownership of Land. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, A. (2012) Commons and enclosure in the colonization of North America. The American Historical Review. doi:10.1086/ahr.117.2.365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1998) Extensions of ‘the tragedy of the commons.’ Science 280(5364): 682–683. doi:10.1126/science.280.5364.682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. and Sunstein, C.R. (1999) The Cost of Rights: Why Liberty Depends on Taxes, 1st edn. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honoré, A.M. (1961) Ownership. In: A.G. Guest (ed.) Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence: A Collaborative Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsueh, V. (2006) Cultivating and challenging the common: Lockean property, indigenous traditionalisms, and the problem of exclusion. Contemporary Political Theory 5(2): 193–214. doi:10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson Papers Online | The Papers of Thomas Jefferson. (2015) https://jeffersonpapers.princeton.edu/related-links, accessed 1 August.

  • Kendall, W. (1959) John Locke and the Doctrine of Majority-Rule. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, M.H. (1997) John Locke and the Origins of Private Property: Philosophical Explorations of Individualism, Community, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, P. (2012) Can we own the past? Cultural artifacts as public goods. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1980) Second Treatise of Government, 1st ed. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1988) First Treatise of Government. In P. Laslett (ed.) Two Treatises of Government, student edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, C.B. (1964) The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. 8th impression. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Macpherson, C.B. (1978) Property, Mainstream and Critical Positions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. (1963) Collected Works. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2004) Justice, Democracy and Public Goods. In: Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Narveson, J. (2010) Property and rights. Social Philosophy & Policy 27(1): 101–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neeson, J.M. (1993) Commoners: Common Right, Enclosure and Social Change in England, 1700-1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. The Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (2004) Republic. Trans by C.D.C. Reeve. Princeton: Hackett.

  • Rose, C.M. (1985) Possession as the origin of property. The University of Chicago Law Review 52 (1): 73–88. doi:10.2307/1599571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C.M. (1994) Property and Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory, and Rhetoric of Ownership. New Perspectives on Law, Culture, and Society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1987) Basic Political Writings. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. (1965) Locke and the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. Political Studies 13: 219– 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtz, D. (2010) Property and justice. Social Philosophy & Policy 27(1): 79–100. doi:10.1017/S0265052509990045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivasan, G. (1995) The Limits of Lockean Rights in Property. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, G.G. (1991) Common Property Economics: A General Theory and Land Use Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Paine: Agrarian Justice. (2016) http://www.constitution.org/tp/agjustice.htm, accessed February 13.

  • Tomasi, J. (2013) Free Market Fairness. Reprint edn. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trachtenberg, Z. (2014) John Locke: This habitable Earth of ours. In: P. Cannavò and J.H. Lane (eds.) Engaging Nature: Environmentalism and the Political Theory Canon, pp. 100–116. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tully, J. (1980) A Discourse on Property: John Locke and His Adversaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Parijs, P. (2000) A basic income for all. Boston Review, October.

  • Waldron, J. (1988) The Right to Private Property. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, J. (1991) Homelessness and the issue of freedom. UCLA Law Review 39: 295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, D. (2014) The Commons in History: Culture, Conflict, and Ecology. History for a Sustainable Future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks go to the following for their helpful comments on earlier drafts: Julie Rose, Russ Muirhead, Luke Swaine and the other participants of the Dartmouth Political Economy Project seminar; Jim Murphy, Steven Kelts, Jonathan Allen, Lisa Disch and the anonymous reviewers for CPT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Lindsay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lindsay, P. Re-envisioning property. Contemp Polit Theory 17, 187–206 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-017-0157-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-017-0157-4

Keywords

Navigation