Abstract
Physiognomic properties refer to the nonliteral sensory, perceptual, and affective connotations evoked by an object: a mountain, for example, is big as well as “quiet, looming, and threatening.” In this study (N = 58), the three types of meanings carried by meaningless stimuli were examined. Four equally unfamiliar stimuli, which were either physiognomically evocative (maluma and taketa) or neutral, were rated on 15 perceptual, affective, and sensory scales. Taketa and maluma were distinguished on 21 of the 30 endpoints of the scales, whereas the neutral stimuli were distinguished on only 8. Subjects’ physiognomy and sex did not play a role. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnheim, R. (1972). The Gestalt theory of expression. In R. Arnheim (Ed.), Toward a psychology of art: Collected essays (pp. 51-73). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bilotta, J., Guare, J., & Lindauer, M. S. (1981). The relationship between field independence/dependence, creativity, and physiognomy among men and women. JSAS Selected Documents in Psychology, 11, (Ms. No. 2287)
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gombrich, E. H. (1972). The mask and the face: The perception of physiognomic likeness in life and art. In E. H. Gombrich, J. Hochberg, & M. Black (Eds.), Art, perception and reality (pp. 1–46). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Homberg, A. (1986). On the visualization of some basic mental concepts. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 4, 109–129.
Kohler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright. (Original work published 1938)
Lindauer, M. S. (1984a). Physiognomnic perception. In R. J. Corsini (Ed.), Wiley encylcopedia of psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 34–35). New York: Wiley.
Lindauer, M. S. (1984b). Physiognomy and art: Approaches from above, below, and sideways. Visual Arts Research, 10, 52–65.
Lindauer, M. S. (1986). Perceiving, imaging, and preferring the colors of physiognomic stimuli. American Journal of Psychology, 99, 233–255.
Lindauer, M. S. (1988). Size and distance perception of the physiognomic stimulus “taketa.” Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 217–220.
Lyman, B. (1979). Representation of complex emotional and abstract meanings by simple forms. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 49, 839–842.
Marks, L. E. (1978). The unity of the senses. New York: Academic Press.
Osgood, C. E., May, W. H., & Miron, M. S. (1975). Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Pratt, C. C. (1969). Introduction to The task of Gestalt psychology (pp. 3–29), by W. Kohler. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schlesinger, L. B. (1980). Physiognomic perception: Empirical and theoretical persepectives. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 101, 71–97.
Stein, M. L. (1975). Physiognomic cue test. New York: Behavioral Publications.
Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Werner, H. (1956). On physiognomic perception. In G. Kepes (Ed.), The new landscape in art and science (pp. 280–282). Chicago: Paul Theobald.
Werner, H., & Wapner, S. (1952). Toward a general theory of perception. Psychological Review, 59, 324–338.
Winner, E. (1982). Invented worlds: The psychology of the arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
A brief version of this study, entitled “’The Perceptual, Affective, and Synesthetic Meanings of Physiognomic Stimuli,” was presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Buffalo, NY, 1988.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindauer, M.S. The meanings of the physiognomic stimuli taketa and maluma . Bull. Psychon. Soc. 28, 47–50 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337645
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337645