Abstract
The article deals with a hitherto largely neglected group of poetic texts that is characterized by the representation of the vicissitudes and deeds of a single hero (or god) through a third-person omniscient authorial voice, henceforth called ‘aretalogical poetry’. I want to demonstrate that in terms of form, contents, intertextual ‘self-awareness’ and long-term influence, aretalogical poetry qualifies as a fully-fledged epic genre comparable to bucolic or didactic poetry. In order not to blur my argument, I will focus on heroic aretalogies, and on Heracleids and Theseids in particular, because of their prominence in the minds of ancient literary critics. In the case of Heraclean aretalogies, it is expedient to distinguish further between aretalogies of ‘epic’ and ‘lyric epic’ (i.e. lyric poets such as Stesichorus, who writes ‘epic’ aretalogies).
Bibliography
Aristotle, Poetics, transl. by I. Bywater, in: J. Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, Princeton 1984, 2316–2340.10.1515/9781400835850-019Search in Google Scholar
Collectanea Alexandrina. Reliquiae minores poetarum Graecorum aetatis Ptolemaicae 323–146 A.C., ed. U. P. Powell, Oxford 1925.Search in Google Scholar
Die griechischen Dichterfragmente der römischen Kaiserzeit, vol. II, ed. E. Heitsch, Göttingen 1964.Search in Google Scholar
Die Fragmente der Griechischen Historiker. Parts I–IV, ed. and comm. by F. Jacoby et al., Berlin 1923–1999.Search in Google Scholar
Epicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, ed. M. Davies, Göttingen 1988.Search in Google Scholar
Greek Epic Fragments. From the Seventh to the Fifth Centuries BC, ed. and transl. by M. L. West (Loeb vol. 497), Cambridge, MA 2003.Search in Google Scholar
Hesiod, Vol. I: Theogony. Works and Days. Testimonia, ed. and transl. by G. W. Most (Loeb vol. 57), Cambridge, MA 2006; Vol. II: The Shield. Catalogue of Women. Other Fragments, ed. and transl. by G. W. Most (Loeb vol. 503), Cambridge, MA 2007.Search in Google Scholar
Iambi et Elegi Graeci ante Alexandrum cantati, vol. II, ed. M. West, Oxford 21992.Search in Google Scholar
Ioannis Stobaei anthologii libri duo posteriores, vol. I–II, ed. O. Hense, Berlin 1958.Search in Google Scholar
Philostratus. Heroicus. Gymnasticus. Discourse 1 and 2, ed. and transl. by J. Rusten/J. König (Loeb vol. 521), Cambridge, MA 2014.10.4159/DLCL.philostratus_athens-discourses_1.2014Search in Google Scholar
Pindari Carmina cum Fragmentis, Pars II: Fragmenta. Indices, ed. H. Maehler, Leipzig 1989.Search in Google Scholar
Poetae Comici Graeci, vol. I–VIII, edd. R. Kassel et C. Austin, Berlin/New York 1983–2001.Search in Google Scholar
Poetae Epici Graeci. Testimonia et Fragmenta. Pars I, ed. A. Bernabé, Stuttgard/Leipzig 22007.Search in Google Scholar
Poetae Melici Graeci, ed. D. Page, Oxford 1962.Search in Google Scholar
Supplementum Hellenisticum, ed. H. Lloyd-Jones/P. Parsons, Berlin/New York 1983.10.1515/9783110837766Search in Google Scholar
Supplementum Supplementi Hellenistici, ed. H. Lloyd-Jones, Berlin/New York 2005.10.1515/9783110896466Search in Google Scholar
The Geography of Strabo, transl. by D. W. Roller, Cambridge, MA 2014.Search in Google Scholar
Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, vol. I–V, edd. B. Snell/R. Kannicht, Göttingen 1971–2004.Search in Google Scholar
E. Alexiou, Der Euagoras des Isokrates. Ein Kommentar, Berlin/New York 2010.10.1515/9783110229899Search in Google Scholar
A. Bernabé, “El mito de Teseo en la Poesía arcaica y clásica”, in: R. Olmos (ed.), Coloquio sobre Teseo y la copa de Aison, Madrid 1992, 97–118.Search in Google Scholar
J. Boardman, “I. Herakles Alone. B. Greek Archaic”, in: LIMC IV.1, 1988, 731–738 (nos. 1–85).Search in Google Scholar
J. Boardman, “IV. Herakles’ Labours. A. Dodekathlos”, in: LIMC V.1, 1990, 5–16 (nos. 1697–1704).Search in Google Scholar
W. Burkert, “Die Leistung eines Kreophylos”, in: W. Burkert, Kl. Schriften I. Homerica (ed. C. Riedweg), Göttingen 2001, 138–149 (= MH 29, 1972, 74–85).Search in Google Scholar
A. Cameron, Callimachus and his Critics, Princeton 1995.Search in Google Scholar
C. Carey, “Stesichorus and the Epic Cycle”, in: P. J. Finglass/A. Kelly (eds.), Stesichorus in Context, Cambridge 2015, 45–62.10.1017/CBO9781107706989.004Search in Google Scholar
E. Cingano, “Teseo et i Teseidi tra Troia e Atene”, in: P. Angeli Bernardini (ed.), L’epos minore, le tradizioni locali e la poesia arcaica. Atti dell’incontro di studio, Urbino, 7 Giugno 2005, Pisa/Roma 2007, 91–102.Search in Google Scholar
E. Cingano, “Epic Fragments on Theseus: Hesiod, Cercops, and the Theseis”, in: T. Derda/J. Hilder/J. Kwapisz (eds.), Fragments, Holes, and Wholes. Reconstructing the Ancient World in Theory and Practice (JJP suppl. 30), Warszawa 2017, 309–332.Search in Google Scholar
M. Davies, Sophocles. Trachiniae, Oxford 1991.10.1093/actrade/9780198148999.book.1Search in Google Scholar
M. Davies/P. J. Finglass, Stesichorus. The Poems, Cambridge 2014.Search in Google Scholar
P. Devambez/A. Kauffmann-Samaras, “Amazones”, in: LIMC I.1, 1981, 586–653.Search in Google Scholar
P. Dolcetti, Ferecide di Atene. Testimonianze e frammenti. Introduzione, testo, traduzione e commento, Alessandria 2004.Search in Google Scholar
H. Erbse, Untersuchungen zur Funktion der Götter im Homerischen Epos, Berlin/New York 1986.10.1515/9783110855623Search in Google Scholar
M. Fantuzzi/C. Tsagalis, The Greek Epic Cycle and its Ancient Reception, Cambridge 2015.10.1017/CBO9780511998409Search in Google Scholar
P. J. Finglass/A. Kelly (eds.), Stesichorus in Context, Cambridge 2015.10.1017/CBO9781107706989Search in Google Scholar
R. L. Fowler, Early Greek Mythography, Vol. I. Texts, Oxford 2000.Search in Google Scholar
R. L. Fowler, Early Greek Mythography, Vol. II. Commentary, Oxford 2013.Search in Google Scholar
K. Galinsky, The Heracles Theme. The Adaptation of the Hero in Literature from Homer to the Twentieth Century, Oxford 1972.Search in Google Scholar
T. Gantz, Early Greek Myth. A Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources, Baltimore/London 1993.Search in Google Scholar
B. Gentili, “Heracle ‘omicida giustissimo’”, in: B. Gentili/G. Paioni (eds.), Il mito greco. Atti del Convegno Internazionale (Urbino 7–12 maggio 1973), Roma 1977, 299–305.Search in Google Scholar
A. S. F. Gow/D. L. Page, The Greek Anthology. Hellenistic Epigrams, 2 vols., Cambridge 1965.Search in Google Scholar
S. Halliwell, “Traditional Greek Conceptions of Character”, in: C. Pelling (ed.), Characterization and Individuality in Greek Literature, Oxford 1990, 32–59.Search in Google Scholar
J. Haubold, “Heracles in the Hesiodic Catalogue of Women”, in: R. Hunter (ed.), The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women. Constructions and Reconstructions, Cambridge 2005, 85–98.10.1017/CBO9780511482243.005Search in Google Scholar
H. Herter, “Theseus”, in: RE suppl. 13, 1973, cols. 1045–1238.Search in Google Scholar
M. Hirschberger, Gynaikôn Katalogos und Megalai Êhoiai, München/Leipzig 2004.Search in Google Scholar
N. Hopkinson, Theocritus. Moschus. Bion, Cambridge, MA/London 2015.Search in Google Scholar
G. L. Huxley, Greek Epic Poetry from Eumelos to Panyassis, London 1969.Search in Google Scholar
F. Jacoby, Atthis. The Local Chronicles of Ancient Athens, Oxford 1949.Search in Google Scholar
R. Janko, The Iliad: A Commentary, Volume IV: books 13–16, Cambridge et al. 1992.10.1017/CBO9780511620249Search in Google Scholar
A. Kauffmann-Samaras, “Antiope II”, in: LIMC I.1, 1981, 857–859.Search in Google Scholar
A. Kelly, “Stesichorus’ Homer”, in: P. J. Finglass/A. Kelly (eds.), Stesichorus in Context, Cambridge 2015, 21–44.10.1017/CBO9781107706989.003Search in Google Scholar
G. Kirk, “Methodological Reflexions on the Myths of Heracles”, in: B. Gentili/G. Paioni (eds.), Il mito greco. Atti del Convegno Internazionale (Urbino 7–12 maggio 1973), Roma 1977, 285–297.Search in Google Scholar
G. Kirk, The Iliad: A Commentary, Volume I: books 1–4, Cambridge et al. 1985.10.1017/CBO9780511620263Search in Google Scholar
W. Kullmann, Das Wirken der Götter in der Ilias. Untersuchungen zur Frage der Entstehung des Homerischen ‘Götterapparats’, Berlin 1956.10.1515/9783112613382Search in Google Scholar
W. Kullmann, “Gods and Men in the Iliad and Odyssey”, HSPh 89, 1985, 1–23.10.2307/311265Search in Google Scholar
P. Kyriakou, “The Violence of Nomos in Pindar frg. 169a”, MD 48, 2002, 195–206.10.2307/40236220Search in Google Scholar
H. Lloyd-Jones, “Heracles at Eleusis: P.Oxy.2622 and P.S.I.1391 [Pind. frg. 346 S.-M.]”, in: H. Lloyd-Jones, Greek Epic, Lyric, and Tragedy. The Academic Papers of Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones, Oxford 1990, 167–187 (= Maia 19, 1967, 206–229).Search in Google Scholar
H. Maehler, Die Lieder des Bakchylides. 2. Teil, Die Dithyramben und Fragmente (Mnemosyne Supplements 167), Leiden 1997.10.1163/9789004329911Search in Google Scholar
H. Maehler, Bacchylides. A Selection, Cambridge 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511802386Search in Google Scholar
V. J. Matthews, Panyassis of Halikarnassos (Mnemosyne Supplements 33), Leiden 1974.10.1163/9789004327429Search in Google Scholar
S. Mills, Theseus, Tragedy and the Athenian Empire, Oxford 1997.Search in Google Scholar
A. Momigliano, The Development of Greek Biography, Harvard 1971.Search in Google Scholar
J. Neils, The Youthful Deeds of Theseus, Roma 1987.Search in Google Scholar
J. Neils, “Theseus”, in: LIMC VII.1, 1994, 922–940 (nos 1–227), 943–951 (nos 264–322).Search in Google Scholar
T. Papadopoulou, Heracles and Euripidean Tragedy, Oxford 2005.10.1017/CBO9780511482342Search in Google Scholar
R. Parker, Athenian Religion. A History, Oxford 1996.Search in Google Scholar
C. Pavese, “The New Heracles Poem of Pindar”, HSPh 72, 1968, 47–88.10.2307/311075Search in Google Scholar
D. Petrain, Homer in Stone. TheTabulae Iliacaein theirRoman Context, Cambridge 2014.10.1017/CBO9781139342612Search in Google Scholar
A. J. Podlecki, “Theseus and Themistocles”, RSA 5, 1975, 1–24.10.1017/S0066477400004391Search in Google Scholar
O. Poltera, Simonides lyricus. Testimonia und Fragmente. Einleitung, kritische Ausgabe, Übersetzung und Kommentar, Basel 2008.Search in Google Scholar
P. Roth, “Zu Panyassis F 12–14”, RhM 134, 1991, 238–252.10.1002/dvg.1020120309Search in Google Scholar
L. Sbardella, “Tracce di un epos di Eracle nei poemi omerici“, SMEA 33, 1994, 145–162.Search in Google Scholar
W. Schmid/O. Stählin, Geschichte der Griechischen Literatur I.1, München 1929.Search in Google Scholar
E. Stafford, Herakles, London/New York 2012.10.4324/9780203152454Search in Google Scholar
L. Swift, “Stesichorus on Stage”, in: P. J. Finglass/A. Kelly (eds.), Stesichorus in Context, Cambridge 2015, 125–144.10.1017/CBO9781107706989.009Search in Google Scholar
N. Valenzuela Montenegro, Die Tabulae Iliacae: Mythos und Geschichte im Spiegel einer Gruppe frühkaiserzeitlicher Miniaturreliefs, Berlin 2004.Search in Google Scholar
J. Wackernagel, Lectures on Syntax. With Special Reference to Greek, Latin, and Germanic, transl. by D. Langslow, Oxford 2009.Search in Google Scholar
H. J. Walker, Theseus and Athens, Oxford 1995.Search in Google Scholar
M. L. West, “The Rise of the Greek Epic”, JHS 108, 1988, 151–172.10.2307/632637Search in Google Scholar
M. L. West, “Towards a Chronology of Early Greek Epic”, in: Ø. Andersen/T. T. Haug (eds.), Relative Chronology in Early Greek Poetry, Cambridge 2012, 224–241.10.1017/CBO9780511921728.015Search in Google Scholar
M. L. West, “Epic, Lyric, and Lyric Epic”, in: P. J. Finglass/A. Kelly (eds.), Stesichorus in Context, Cambridge 2015, 63–80.10.1017/CBO9781107706989.005Search in Google Scholar
U. v. Wilamowitz-Möllendorff, “Die Griechische Heldensage I”, in: Sitzungsberichte der preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1925, 41–62 = U. v. Wilamowitz-Möllendorff, Kl. Schriften V.2. Glaube und Sage, ed. L. Malten, Berlin/Amsterdam 1971, 54–84 (according to which I quote).10.1515/9783112528747-005Search in Google Scholar
F. Zardini, The Myth of Herakles and Kyknos. A Study in Greek Vase-Painting and Literature, Verona 2009.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
