Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Discriminating Between ‘Meaningful Work’ and the ‘Management of Meaning’

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interest in meaningful work has significantly increased over the last two decades. Much of␣the associated managerial research has focused on researching ways to ‹provide and manage meaning’ through leadership or organizational culture. This stands in sharp contrast with the literature of the humanities which suggests that meaningfulness does not need to be provided, as the distinct feature of a human being is that␣he or she has an intrinsic ‹will to meaning’. The research that has been done based on the humanistic paradigm has been quite fragmented. This article aims to address these gaps through an action research project that actively involved participants in the process of affirming and uncovering the meaningfulness of their work. Our findings contribute to current organizational scholarship and practice as they (a) enable scholars to clearly distinguish ‹meaningful work’ from ‹the management of mean- ing’, (b) bring together the various sources of meaningful work in one framework and show their relationship with each other, (c) clearly show the importance of engaging with both the inspiration towards the ideal as well as the often less than perfect self and the organizational reality in which meaning gets expressed and (d) contribute to our understanding of how to engage individuals in conversations about meaningful work that are not prescriptive or exclusive, but that also show where meanings are commonly held.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aktouf, O.: 1992, ‹Management and theories of organizations in the 1990s: Toward a critical radical humanism?’, Academy of Management Review 17(3), 407–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., and D. Vaidyanath.: 2002, ‹Work organizations as secular religions’, Journal of Management Inquiry 11(4), 359 - 370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, D. F., C. Miller-Dyce, and D. Carlone: 2008, ‹Security, dignity, caring relationships and meaningful work’, Community College Review 35(4), 257–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, D.: 1966, The duality of human Existence: Isolation and communion in Western man (Beacon Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Battlista, J., and R. Almond: 1973, ‹The development of meaning in life’, Psychiatry 36, 409–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, F. B., and J. A. Waters: 1989, ‹The moral muteness of managers’, California Management Review 32(1), 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. E.: 1998, ‹A Kantian theory of meaningful work’, The Journal of Business Ethics 17(9/10), 1083–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J.: 1990, Acts of Meaning (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA). .

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, C.: 1999, ‹Come and join our family: Discipline and Integration in corporate organizational culture’, Human Relations 52(2), 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R. F., and M. Elden: 1993, ‹Features of emerging action research’, Human Relations 46, 275–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciulla, J. B.: 1998, Leadership and the problem of bogus empowerment (Quorum Books, Westport, CT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J.: 2006, ‹A discussion paper about ‹meaning’ in the nursing literature on spirituality: An interpretation of meaning as ‹ultimate concern’ using the work of Paul Tillich’, International Journal of Nursing Studies 43(7), 915–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. E.: 1990, Existentialism: a reconstruction (Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Costea, B., N. Crump, and K.Amiridis: 2008, ‹Managerialism, the therapeutic habitus and the self in contemporary organizing’, Human Relations 61(5), 661–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, M.: 2007, ‹A spiritual turn in organizations: meaning making or meaningless?’, The Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion 4(1), 56–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, S.: 1983, ‹Work meanings, non-work, and the taken-for-granted’, Journal of Management Studies 20(2), 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. E.: 1959, Man’s search for meaning (Pocket Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. E.: 1969, The will to meaning (New American Library, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H.: 1993, Intelligence reframed, Multiple intelligences for the 21st century (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R. A., and C. Jurkiewicz: 2003, ‹Toward a science of workplace spirituality’, in R. A. Giacalone and C. Jurkiewicz (eds.), Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk), pp. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, R.: 2001, Dignity at work (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsing, Y.: 1998, Being good: Buddhist ethics for everyday life (Weatherhill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S.: 2004, ‹Being in the moment and shifting self-perspectives’, The American Journal of Psycholanalysis 64(1), 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackall, R.: 1988, Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kekes, J.: 1986, ‹The informed will and the meaning of life’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, N.: 1998, ‹Template analysis’, in G. Symon and C. Cassell (eds.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, E. (ed.): 1998, The search for meaning in evolutionary perspective and its clinical applications (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ). .

    Google Scholar 

  • Korotkov, D. L.: 1998, ‹The sense of coherence: Making sense out of chaos’, in P. T. P. Wong and P. Fry (eds.), The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ). pp. 51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, G.: 2002, The spirited business, success stories of soul friendly companies (Hodder and Stoughton, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langle, A.: 2003, ‹Burn-out. Existential meaning and possibilities of prevention’, European Psychotherapy 4(1), 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lips-Wiersma, M. S.: 2002a, ‹Analysing the career concerns of spiritually oriented people: lessons for contemporary organizations’, Career Development International 7(7), 385–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lips-Wiersma, M. S.: 2002b, ‹The influence of spirituality on career behavior’, Journal of Management Development 21(7), 497–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luscher, L. S., and M. W. Lewis: 2008, ‹Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: working through paradox’, The Academy of Management Journal 51(2), 221–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J.: 2001, ‹Self-reflective inquiry practices’, in P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (Sage, London), pp. 433–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. W.: 2000, Meaningful work, Rethinking professional ethics (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • May, D. R., R. L. Gilson,, and L. M.Harter: 2004, ‹The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 77, 11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, C.: 2008, ‹Work and the most terrible life’, Journal of Business Ethics 77, 335–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I.: 2003, ‹Do not promote religion under the guise of spirituality’, Organization 10(2), 375–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muirhead, R.: 2004, Just Work (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R.: 1974, Anarchy, State & Utopia (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg, D.: 2008, ‹The morality of everyday activities: Not the right, but the good thing to do’, Journal of Business Ethics 81, 587–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, K. W., and A. Bryman: 2006, ‹Leadership in Organizations’, in S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence and W. R. Nord (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, second edition (Sage, London), pp. 447–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E. S.: 1997, Rewarding Work (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines, M.: 2002, ‹The female entrepreneur: Burnout using a psychodynamic existential approach’, Clinical Case Studies 1(2), 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. G., and B. E. Ashforth: 2003, ‹Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work’, in K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton and R. E. Quinn (eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship (Berret-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco), pp. 309–327).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P.: 2006, ‹Choice and quality in action research practice’, Journal of Management Inquiry 15(2), 187–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., and H. Bradbury (eds.): 2001, Handbook of action research, Participative inquiry and practice (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., and B. C. Goodwin: 1999, ‹Toward a science of qualities in organizations: Lessons from complexity theory and postmodern biology’, Concepts and transformations 4(3), 281–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J.: 1996, The End Of Work (Tarcher/Putnam, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R.: 1998, The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism (W.W. Norton & Company, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldrake, P.: 1995, Spirituality and History (SPCK, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sievers, B.: 1994, Work, death and life itself: Essays on management and organization (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P.: 1995, How are we to live? (Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G.: 1995, ‹Psychological empowerment in the work place: Dimensions, measurement, and validation’, Academy of Management Journal 38, 1442–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steingard, D. S.: 2005, ‹Spiritually-Informed Management Theory, Towards Profound Possibilites for Inquiry and Transformation’, Journal of Management Inquiry 14(3), 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillich, P. (ed.); 1987, Religion and secular culture (Collins, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbert, B.: 2004, Action Inquiry, The secret of timely and transforming leadership (Berret-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, Y.: 2001, ‹The mirror, the magnifying glass, the compass and the map: Facilitating participatory action research’, in P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds.), The handbook of action research. Participative inquiry in practice (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.: 2005, ‹A meta reflection on reflective practice and where it leads’. in D. Freshwater and C. Johns (eds.), Transforming nursing through reflective practice. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp. 7-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H.: 1993, ‹Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: managing culture in modern organizations’, Journal of Management Studies 40(4), 515–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, A.: 1997, ‹The Moral Meaning of Work’, Journal of Soci-Economics 26(6), 559–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. T. P., and P. Fry: 1998, The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, L., P. Fletcher,.H. Kawanami, and D. Smith: 2002, Religions in the modern world, Traditions and Transformations (Routledge, London).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Marjolein Lips-Wiersma

  2. Independent Leadership and Sustainability Consultant, Napier, New Zealand

    Lani Morris

Authors
  1. Marjolein Lips-Wiersma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lani Morris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marjolein Lips-Wiersma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lips-Wiersma, M., Morris, L. Discriminating Between ‘Meaningful Work’ and the ‘Management of Meaning’. J Bus Ethics 88, 491–511 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0118-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0118-9

Key words

Search

Navigation