Skip to main content
Log in

Rethinking the ownership of information in the 21st century: Ethical implications

  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses basic concepts and recentdevelopments in intellectual property ownership in theUnited States. Various philosophical arguments havepreviously been put forward to support the creation andmaintenance of intellectual property systems. However, in an age of information, access toinformation is a critical need and should beguaranteed for every citizen. Any right of controlover the information, adopted as an incentive toencourage creation and distribution of intellectualproperty, should be subservient to an overriding needto ensure access to the information. The principlesunderlying intellectual property regimes in the UnitedStates recognize and embody this. In addition, thephilosophical/ethical dimensions of this debate couldalso be structured to support this attitude as well. Intellectual property is fast becoming digitalproperty. New technologies allow owners to extendtheir control of both legitimate uses and misuses ofthe intellectual property. Recent trends demonstratethat the access principle has not always beenparamount in judicial or legislative applications. Thetrend rather is to allow a proprietarianism factor todominate the analysis. Finally, several principles areforwarded which would assist adjudicators and policymakers in reaffirming the basic purpose of theintellectual property law, which is to benefit thepublic at large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Geophysical Union v. Texaco Inc., 37 F. 3d 881 (2nd Cir. 1994).

  • Annual Report of the Register of Copyrights. Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 1997.

  • I.G. Barbour. Ethics in an Age of Technology (series: The Gilford Lectures, 1989–1991: Volume 2). Harper San Franciso, San Francisco, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Baudrillard. Simulations. Semoitext[e] (trans. P. Foss, P. Patton, and P. Beitchman). New York, 1983.

  • C.A. Beard. An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. Macmillan, Boston (originally published in 1913), 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • T.W. Bell. Fair Use v. Fared Use: The Impact of Automated Rights Management on Copyright's Fair Use Doctrine. North Carolina Law Review, 76: 557–619.

  • R.V. Bettig. Copyrighting Culture: The Political Economy of Intellectual Property. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Bouckaert. What is Property? Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 13: 775–816, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Brickley. University, Drug Companies Fight Cutthroat Battle Over Anti-HIV Drugs: Aids Patients Real Losers in Intellectual Property Battle. Corporate Legal Times, April: 1, 1997.

  • D.J. Boudreaux and A.C. Pritchard. Rewriting the Constitution: An Economic Analysis of the Constitutional Amendment Process. Fordham Law Review, 62: 111–162, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972).

  • A.W. Branscomb. Who Owns Information: From Privacy to Public Access. Basic Books, New York, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Britz. Inligtingsetiek met spesifieke verwysing na die beroep van die inligtingkundige-'n christelike perspektief [Information Ethics with Specific Reference to the Information Specialist: A Christian Perspective]. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.L. Brody and D.C. Baker. Trademarks May Thwart Gray Market Importers: Manufacturers Hurt by Recent Supreme Court Copyright Ruling May Turn to Trademark Laws, The National Law Journal, May 18: C6-C7, 1998.

  • Burten v. Milton Bradley Company, 763 F.2d 461 (1st Cir. 1985).

  • Cavagnuolo et al. v. Rudin et al., No. 94 Civ. 0585 (S.D.N.Y. 1994).

  • Z. Chafee. Reflexions [sic] on the Law of Copyright (Parts I and II). Columbia Law Review, 45: 504–529 and 719–738, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.W. Child. The Moral Foundations of Intangible Property. In A.D. Moore, editor, Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal, and International Dilemmas, pp. 57–80. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collections of Information Antipiracy Act, H.R. 2652, 105th Cong., 1st Sess. (1997), H.R. 352, 106th Cong., 1st Sess. (1999).

  • Computer Software Rental Amendments Act of 1990, Public Law 101–650, 104 Statutes at Large 5089 (1990).

  • CSTB (Computer Science and Telecommunications Board). Intellectual Property Issues in Software. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Curriden. Patent Law Favors AZT Maker. American Bar Association Journal, 79: 30, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.P. Currie. The Constitution in the Supreme Court: The Protection of Economic Interests, 1889–1910. University of Chicago Law Review, 52: 324–380, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.W. Dam. The Economic Underpinnings of Patent Law. Intellectual Property Law Review, 27: 1–27 (reprinted from (1994) Journal of Legal Studies, 23: 247–271), 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. D'Amato and D.E. Long, editors. International Intellectual Property Law. Kluwer Law International, London, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.A. David. Intellectual Property Institutions and the Panda's Thumb: Patents, Copyrights, and Trade Secrets in Economic Theory and History, 1961. In M.B. Wallerstein et al., editors, Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology (Office of International Affairs National Research Council). National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Davies. Copyright and the Public Interest (Studies in Industrial Property and Copyright Law). John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Davis. Patents, Natural Rights, and Natural Property. In V. Weil and J.W. Snapper, editors, Owning Scientific and Technical Information. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.A. Drahos. Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Dartmouth Press, Aldershot, United Kingdom, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.K. Ebling and K.E. Kreider. Dilution is Remedy for Internet Mark Misuse. The National Law Journal, May 18: C31-C33, 1998.

  • N. Elkin-Koren. Cyberlaw and Social Change: A Democratic Approach to Copyright Law in Cyberspace. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 14: 215–295, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entertainment Law Reporter Recent Cases: Action Claiming that Court TV Misappropriated Idea for 24-Hour Courtroom Cable Television Channel is Rejected. Entertainment Law Reporter, 16: no pagination, 1993.

  • Entertainment Law Reporter Recent Cases: Interactive Telephone Game Creator Fails to Show Novelty and Originality Required for Misappropriation Claim. Entertainment Law Reporter, 16: no pagination (available in the LEXIS-NEXIS Legnew Library), 1994.

  • Entertainment Law Reporter Recent Cases: Hershey Foods Prevails in Action Alleging Misappropriation if Idea for Television Commercial. Entertainment Law Reporter, 16: no pagination (available in the LEXIS-NEXIS Legnew Library), 1995.

  • Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991).

  • Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., 510 U.S. 517 (1994).

  • W.J. Gordon. On Owning Information. Virginia Law Review, 78: 149–281, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.A. Hamilton. The TRIPS Agreement: Imperialistic, Outdate, and Overprotective. In A.D. Moore, editor, Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal, and International Dilemmas, pp. 243–263. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, 1997a.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.A. Hamilton. Reconceptualizing Ratings: From Censorship to Marketplace. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 15: 403–408, 1997b.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.C. Hansen. International Copyright: An Unorthodox Analysis. In A.D. Moore, editor, Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal, and International Dilemmas. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Hardin. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162: 1243–1248, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • I.T. Hardy. The Ancient Doctrine of Trespass to Web Sites. Journal of Online Law, October: Article #7 (15 pages) (available at http://www.wm.edu/law/publications/jol), 1996.

  • L.E. Harris. Digital Property: Currency of the 21st Century. McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Ontario, Canada, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasbro, Inc. v. the Internet Entertainment Group, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11626; 40 U.S. P. Q. 2d (BNA) 1479 (W.D. Wash. 1996).

  • E.C. Hettinger. Justifying Intellectual Property. In A.D. Moore, editor, Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal, and International Dilemmas, pp. 17–37. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • House Report 101–735 Copyright Amendments Act of 1990. United States Congress, 101st Congress, 2d Session.

  • House Report 105–452 Copyright Term Extension Act. United States Congress, 105th Congress, 2nd Session, 1998.

  • J. Hughes. The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Georgetown Law Journal, 77: 287–366, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intermatic, Inc. v. Toeppen, 947 F. Supp. 1227 (N. D. Ill. 1996).

  • W.W. Landes and R.A. Posner. An Economic Analysis of Copyright. Journal of Legal Studies, 18: 325–363 (reprinted in (1990) Intellectual Property Law Review, 22: 447–485), 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotus Development Corporation v. Borland International, Inc., 700 F. Supp. 203 (D.Mass. 1992), rev'd 49 F. 3d 807 (1st Cir. 1995), aff'd 516 U.S. 233 (1996) (per curiam).

  • J.F. Lyotard. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. MacKaay. Economic Incentives in Markets for Information and Innovation. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 13: 867–909, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Madon. Information-Based Global Economy and Socioeconomic Development: The Case of Bangladore. The Information Society, 3(3): 229–239, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Madison. Legal-Ware: Contract and Copyright in the Digital Age. Fordham Law Review, 68: 1025–1143, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon E. Martin. Bits, Bytes, and Big Brother: Federal Information Center in the Technological Age, Preager Press, Westport, Conneticut, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.O. Mason. Four Ethical Issues of the Information Age. MIS Quarterly, 10: 46–54, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. McEvoy. Market and Ethics in United States Property Law. In H.M. Jacobs, editor, Who Owns America? Social Conflict Over Property Rights, pp. 94–113. 1998.

  • C.R. McManis. Do Not Support Privatizing Copyright. National Law Journal, October 13: A2, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Meiners and R.J. Staff. Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks: Property or Monopoly? Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 13: 911–941, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mineral deposits Ltd. v. Zigan, 773 P. 2d 606 (Colo. App. 1988) (reverse engineering not allowed when product loaned in confidence).

  • J. Moor. Just Consequentialism and Computing, paper presented at CEPE, Computer Ethics and Philosophical Enquiry [sic]. London School of Economics, London, UK, December 14–15, 1998.

  • A.D. Moore. Toward a Lockean Theory of Intellectual Property. In A.D. Moore, editor, Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal, and International Dilemmas, pp. 81–103. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray v. National Broadcasting Company, 844 F.2d 988 2nd Cir. 1988).

  • D.A. Nance. Foreword: Owning Ideas. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 13: 757–773, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Basketball Association v. Motorola, Inc., and Sports Team Analysis, 939 F. Supp. 1071 (S.D.N.Y. 1996, rev'd 105 F. 3d 841 (2nd Cir. 1997).

  • NCCB. National Conference of Catholic Bishops Economic Justice for All (Pastoral Letter on Catholic Social Teaching and the United States Economy), Washington D.C., 1986.

  • R.T. Nimmer. The Law of Computer Technology: Rights, Licenses, Liabilities (2nd edn.), Warren. Gorham, Lamont, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.T. Nimmer and Krauthaus. Information as a Commodity: New Imperatives of Commercial Law. Law & Contemporary Problems, 55: 103–130, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.S. Oddi. An Uneasier Case for Copyright Than for Patent Protections of Computer Programs. Nebraska Law Review, 72: 351–453, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.S. Paine. Trade Secrets and the Justification of Intellectual Property: A Comment on Hettinger. In A.D. Moore, editor, Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal, and International Dilemmas, pp. 39–56. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • T.G. Palmer. Are patents and Copyrights Morally Justified? The Philosophy of Property Rights And Ideal Objects. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 13: 817–86, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • T.G. Palmer. Intellectual Property: A Non-Posnerian Law and Economics Approach. In A.D. Moore, editor, Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal, and International Dilemmas, pp. 179–224. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panavision International L.P. v. Toeppen, 945 F. Supp. 1296 (C.D. Cal. 1996), aff'd 141 F.3d 1316 (9th Cir. 1998).

  • L. Ray Patterson. Free Speech, Copyright and Fair Use, 90 Vanderbilt Law Review 1 (1987).

  • L. Ray Patterson and Judge Stanley F. Birch, Jr., Copyright and Free Speech Rights, 4 J. Intell. Prop. L. I. (1996).

  • Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Calvin Designer Label, et al., 985 F. Supp. 1220 (N.D. Cal. 1997).

  • Playboy Entertainment v. Frena, 839 F. Supp. 1552 (M.D. Fla. 1993).

  • R.A. Posner, The Constitution as an Economic Document (The Constitution as an Economic Document: A Symposium Commemorating the Bicentennial of the United States Constitution). George Washington Law Review, 56: 4–38, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.C. Pritchard, Rewriting the Constitution: An Economic Analysis of the Constitutional Amendment Process. Fordham Law Review, 62: 111–162, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Princeton University Press v. Michigan Document Services, 99 F. 3d 1381 (6th Cir. 1996).

  • ProCD v. Zeidenberg, 86 F. 3d 1447 (7th Cir. 1996).

  • Quality King Distributors Inc. v. L'anza Research International Inc., 118 S.Ct. 1125 (1998).

  • J.A. Rawls. Theory of Justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roboserve, Ltd. v. Tom's Foods, Inc., 940 F. 2d 1441 (5th Cir. 1991).

  • J. Rosenoer. CyberLaw: The Law of the Internet. Springer-Verlag Press, New York, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Samuelson, Benson Revisited: The Case Against Patent Protection for Algorithms and Other Computer Program-Related Inventions. Emory Law Journal, 39: 1025–1154, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.W. Severson. The Principles of Information Ethics. M.E. Sharpe Press, Armonk, New York, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Slind-Flor. Biotech Patent Derided: Critics Say It's Overbroad andWill Hinder the Search for Treatment of AIDS. The National Law Journal, April 10: A6, 1995.

  • Sony Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, Pub. L. No. 105–298, 112 Statutes at Large 2827 (H.R. 2589, Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998, S. 505, Copyright Term Extension Act of 1997; H.R. 604, Copyright Term Extension Act of 1997).

  • Sony Corp. of America v. Universal Studios, 464 U.S. 417, 429 (1984).

  • Stewart v. Abend, 495 U.S. 207 (1990).

  • F.L. Street. Law of the Internet. LEXIS Law Publishing, Charlottesville, Virginia, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.D. Stuckey. Internet and Online Law. Law Journal Seminars-Press, New York, New York, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.N. Talbot. New Media: Intellectual Property, Entertainment, and Technology Law. Clark Boardman Callaghan, Deerfield, Illinois, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Timberg. A Modernized Fair Use Code for Visual, Auditory, and Audiovisual Copyrights: Economic Context, Legal Issues, and the Laocoon Shortfall. In J. Shelton Lawrence and B. Timberg, editors, Fair Use and Free Inquiry: Copyright Law and the NewMeida (2nd edn.), pp. 305–336. Ablex, New Jersey, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.V. Tushnet. The Constitution as an Economic Document: Beard Revisited (The Constitution as an Economic Document: A Symposium Commemorating the Bicentennial of the United States Constitution). George Washington Law Review, 56: 106–113, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Constitution, Article 1, §8, Clause 8.

  • J. Van Den Hoven. Distributive Justice and Access to Information: Simple vs. Complex Equality, paper presented at CEPE, Computer Ethics and Philosophical Enquiry, London School of Economics, London, UK, December 14–15, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • James V. Vergari and Virginia V. Shue. Fundamentals of Computer-High Technology Law, ALI-ABA, Philadelphia, PA, 1991, pp. 541–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Von Neuman. Innovation and Competition: Conflict over Intellectual Property Rights in New Technologies. In V. Weil and J.W. Snapper, editors, Owning Scientific and Technical Information: Value and Ethical Issues, pp. 169–192. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Weiss et al., editors. International Economic Law with a Human Face. Kluwer Law International, London, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Weiss and P. De Waart. International Economic Law with a Human Face: An Introductory View. In F. Weiss et al., editors, International Economic Law with a Human Face, pp. 1–11. Kluwer Law International, London, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • White Paper Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure: The Report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (Information Infrastructure Task Force), 1995.

  • J.R. Wolfersberger. Illinois High School Association v. GTE Vantage, Inc.: Dual-Use Classification Threatens the Extinction of America's Small Trademark Holder. Georgia Law Review, 32(1): 363–392, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.R. Yoches. The Compton's Reexamination-A Sign of the Times. The Computer Lawyer, 12: 14–18, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lipinski, T.A., Britz, J. Rethinking the ownership of information in the 21st century: Ethical implications. Ethics and Information Technology 2, 49–71 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010064313976

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010064313976

Navigation