Skip to main content
Log in

Collective action and the traditional village

  • Published:
Journal of agricultural ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article considers the dispute between “moral economy” and “rational peasant” theories of agrarian societies in application to problems of collective action. The moral-economy theory holds that traditional peasant society is organized cooperatively through shared moral values and communal institutions; while the rational-peasant theory maintains that peasant society shows the mark of rational individual calculation, leading to free-rider problems that undermine successful collective action. This article offers an abstract model of a traditional village and assesses the applicability of recent qualifications of the collective action argument to this model. It will emerge that the social characteristics of the traditional village embody features that facilitate collective action by rational peasants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod, Robert. 1984.The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, Brian. 1978.Sociologists, economists and democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, Marc. 1966.French rural history. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, George. 1969. “Theoretical issues in Economic Anthropology.”Current Anthropology 10: 63–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Richard. 1976.The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon. 1982. “Marxism, Functionalism and Game Theory.”Theory and Society 11: 453–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon. 1983.Explaining technical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster Jon. 1985. “Rationality, morality, and collective action.”Ethics 96: 136–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich, Norman, Joe Oppenheimer, and Oran Young. 1971.Political leadership and collective goods. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1963.Agricultural involution: The process of ecological change in Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1971.The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1980.Negara: The theatre state in nineteenth-century Bali. Princeton: Princeton University-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. 1971. “Geometry for the selfish herd,”Journal of Theoretical Biology 31: 295–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, Russell. 1982.Collective action. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Philip C. C. 1985.The peasant economy and social change in north China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, Charles, ed. 1983.Peasant strategies in Asian societies: Moral and rational economic approaches—a symposium. Journal of Asian Studies XLII: 753–868.

  • Lewis, David K. 1969.Convention. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, John. 1975.The theory of evolution. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, Joel. 1974.Peasants, politics and revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Dennis C. 1976. “Public choice: A survey.”Journal of Economic Literature 14: 395–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Ramon H. 1970.The Chinese peasant economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, Manning. 1966.Primitive and peasant economic systems. San Francisco: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur. 1965.The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, Dwight. 1969.Agricultural development in China. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, Elizabeth J. 1980.Rebels and revolutionaries in north China 1845–1945. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Karl. 1957.The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, Samuel 1981. “Public choice and rural development—Free riders, lemons, and institutional design.” InPublic choice and rural development, edited by C. S. Russell and N. K. Nicholson, Washington, D. C.: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, Samuel L. 1979.The rational peasant. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, Anatol. 1966.Two-person game theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, Anatol, and A. M. Chammah. 1965.Prisoners' dilemma: A study in conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Clifford S., and Norman K. Nicholson, ed. 1981.Public choice and rural development. Washington, D. C.: Resources for the Future.

  • Sahlins, Marshall. 1972.Stone age economics. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul. 1955. “Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure,”Review of Economics and Statistics 37: 350–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, Theodore W. 1964.Transforming traditional agriculture. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, James. 1976.The moral economy of the peasant. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1982.Choice, welfare and measurement. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanin, Teodor. 1985.Russia as a “developing society”. Volume 1. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, G. William. 1964,65 “Marketing and social structure in rural China.” 3 parts.Journal of Asian Studies 24:1; 24:2; 24:1; 24:2; 24:3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, G. William. 1978. “Cities and the hierarchy of local systems.” InStudies in Chinese Society. Arthur P. Wolf, ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai, Hue-Tam Ho. 1983.Millenarianism and peasant politics in Vietnam. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Michael. 1976.Anarchy and cooperation. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Michael. 1982.Community, anarchy and liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Eric. 1966.Peasants. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Eric R. 1969.Peasant wars of the twentieth century. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Little, D. Collective action and the traditional village. Journal of Agricultural Ethics 1, 41–58 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02014461

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02014461

Keywords

Navigation