Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T08:09:12.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subjectivity and Dialectic: Hegel in Dialogue with Gadamer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2023

Chunge Liu
Chunge Liu*
Affiliation:
School of Foreign Languages, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China
*
Email: liuchunge0403@dlut.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I defend the contemporary significance of Hegel's thought on subjectivity and dialectic by involving Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Hans-Georg Gadamer in a dialogue, and then, by clarifying the characteristics of spirit and concept. Hegel's theory of subjectivity and his thought on dialectic face many criticisms. One such critic is Gadamer; however, Gadamer's philosophy is, in fact, quite close to Hegel's. I take the Hegel-Gadamer relationship as one illustration of Hegel's relevance and influence. I then further demonstrate Hegel's contemporary importance by analyzing the characteristics of spirit and concept. Finally, I propose that Hegel's absolute spirit and concept remain significant.

Résumé

Résumé

Dans cet article, je défends la signification contemporaine de la pensée de Hegel sur la subjectivité et la dialectique en impliquant Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel et Hans-Georg Gadamer dans un dialogue, puis en clarifiant les caractéristiques de l'esprit et du concept. La théorie de la subjectivité de Hegel et sa pensée sur la dialectique font face à de nombreuses critiques. L'un de ces critiques est Gadamer ; cependant, la philosophie de Gadamer est, en fait, assez proche de celle de Hegel. Je prends la relation Hegel-Gadamer comme une illustration de la pertinence et de l'influence de Hegel. Je démontre ensuite l'importance contemporaine de Hegel en analysant les caractéristiques de l'esprit et du concept. Enfin, je propose que l'esprit absolu et le concept de Hegel restent significatifs.

Keywords

HegelGadamersubjectivitydialecticdialogue
Type
Article
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , First View , pp. 1 - 25
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Canadian Philosophical Association / Publié par Cambridge University Press au nom de l’Association canadienne de philosophie.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkins, K. (2005). Self and subjectivity. Blackwell Publishing. https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/Self-and-Subjectivity-by-Kim-Atkins/9781405112048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, A. (2003). Aesthetics and subjectivity: From Kant to Nietzsche (2nd edition). Manchester University Press. https://www.harvard.com/book/aesthetics_and_subjectivity_from_kant_to_nietzsche/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. B. (2019). A spirit of trust: A reading of Hegel's phenomenology. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674976818Google Scholar
Croce, B. (1915). What is living and what is dead of the philosophy of Hegel (Ainslie, D., Trans.). Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, D. O. (2022). Hegel's truth and Gadamer's method. In George, T. & van der Heiden, G.-J. (Eds.), The Gadamerian mind (pp. 232–245). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Gadamerian-Mind/George-Heiden/p/book/9781032048352Google Scholar
Feuerbach, L. (2006). Das Wesen des Christentums. Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Figal, G. (2002). The doing of the thing itself: Gadamer's hermeneutic ontology of language. In Dostal, R. J. (Ed. & Trans.), The Cambridge companion to Gadamer (pp. 102–125). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521801931.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (2017). Subjectivity and truth: Lectures at the College de France 1980–1981. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Frank, M. (1997). Subjectivity and individuality: Survey of a problem. In Klemm, D. E. & Zöller, G. (Eds.), Figuring the self: Subject, absolute, and others in classical German philosophy (pp. 3–30). State University of New York Press. https://sunypress.edu/Books/F/Figuring-the-Self2#:~:text=Description,Schelling%2C%20Schleiermacher%2C%20and%20HegelGoogle Scholar
Freundlieb, D. (2003). Dieter Henrich and contemporary philosophy: The return to subjectivity. Ashgate. https://www.routledge.com/Dieter-Henrich-and-Contemporary-Philosophy-The-Return-to-Subjectivity/Freundlieb/p/book/9781138258013Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method (2nd edition, Weinsheimer, J. & Marshall, D. G., Trans.). Continuum.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1976). Hegel's dialectic: Five hermeneutical studies (Smith, P. C., Trans.). Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300028423/hegels-dialectic/Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1977). Die Aktualität des Schönen: Kunst als Spiel, Symbol, und Fest. Reclam.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1981). The heritage of Hegel. In Reason in the age of science (Lawrence, F. G., Trans., pp. 38–68). MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262570619/reason-in-the-age-of-science/Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1997). Reflections on my philosophical journey. In Hahn, L. E. (Ed.), The philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer (pp. 3–63). Open Court.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (2007). The artwork in word and image: “So true, so full of being!” In Palmer, R. E. (Ed.), The Gadamer reader: A bouquet of later writings (pp. 192–224). Northwestern University Press. https://nupress.northwestern.edu/9780810119888/the-gadamer-reader/Google Scholar
George, T. (2009). What is the future of the past? Gadamer and Hegel on truth, art and the ruptures of tradition. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 40(1), 4–20. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00071773.2009.11006662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
German, A. R. (2011). Subjectivity as a philosophical problem: The case of Plato and Hegel. Boston University.Google Scholar
Grondin, J. (2003). The philosophy of Gadamer (Plant, K., Trans.). Acumen. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780773582217/htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1969). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion II. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1971). Philosophy of mind (Wallace, W. & Miller, A. V., Trans.). Clarendon Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/hegel-philosophy-of-mind-9780198750147?cc=ca&lang=en&Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit (Miller, A. V., Trans.). Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1990). Lectures on the history of philosophy. The lectures of 1825–1826 (Vol. III, Brown, R. F. & Stewart, J. M., Trans.). University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2007). Lectures on the proofs for the existence of God (Hodgson, P. C., Trans.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010a). Encyclopedia of the philosophical sciences in basic outline. Part I: Science of logic (Brinkmann, K. & Dahlstrom, D. O., Trans.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511780226Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010b). The science of logic (di Giovanni, G., Trans.). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/georg-wilhelm-friedrich-hegel-the-science-of-logic/AB2EA265308BAC6079C566893B1E0124Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1998). Pathmarks (McNeill, W., Ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. M. (2011). Subjectivity in Hegel's aesthetics. University of Notre Dame. https://curate.nd.edu/show/mc87pn91p5xGoogle Scholar
Nuzzo, A. (2019). The “absoluteness” of Hegel's absolute spirit. In Bykova, M. F. (Ed.), Hegel's philosophy of spirit: A critical guide (pp. 207–224). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108164184.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. B. (2005). The persistence of subjectivity: On the Kantian aftermath. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, . (1997). Complete works (Cooper, J. M., Ed.). Hackett Publishing Company. https://hackettpublishing.com/complete-worksGoogle Scholar
Risser, J. (2002). In the shadow of Hegel: Infinite dialogue in Gadamer's hermeneutics. Research in Phenomenology, 32, 86–102. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24659227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, T. (2015). Making sense of Heidegger: A paradigm shift. Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd. https://rowman.com/isbn/9781783481194/making-sense-of-heidegger-a-paradigm-shiftGoogle Scholar
Sherman, D. (2007). Sartre and Adorno: The dialectics of subjectivity. State University of New York Press. https://sunypress.edu/Books/S/Sartre-and-AdornoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, M. (1992). Hegel, freedom, and modernity. State University of New York Press. https://sunypress.edu/Books/H/Hegel-Freedom-and-Modernity2Google Scholar