Analogical Investigations

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, Sep 10, 2015 - Philosophy - 139 pages
Western philosophy and science are responsible for constructing some powerful tools of investigation, aiming at discovering the truth, delivering robust explanations, verifying conjectures, showing that inferences are sound and demonstrating results conclusively. By contrast reasoning that depends on analogies has often been viewed with suspicion. Professor Lloyd first explores the origins of those Western ideals, criticises some of their excesses and redresses the balance in favour of looser, admittedly non-demonstrative analogical reasoning. For this he takes examples both from ancient Greek and Chinese thought and from the materials of recent ethnography to show how different ancient and modern cultures have developed different styles of reasoning. He also develops two original but controversial ideas, that of semantic stretch (to cast doubt on the literal/metaphorical dichotomy) and the multidimensionality of reality (to bypass the realism versus relativism and nature versus nurture controversies).
 

Contents

List of diagrams page
1
On the very possibility of mutual intelligibility
10
The multiple valences of comparatism
29
some firstorder
43
Analogies as heuristic
58
Diagrams
59
Euclid Elements i 5 page
62
Alternative Proof of Euclid i 5
63
Sam Loyds puzzle
66
Sam Loyd Juniors variation
67
Kepler Paralipomena to Witelo ch 4
69
Hexagram 27 Yi
76
Ontologies revisited
88
Conclusions
109
Glossary of Chinese terms
122
Index
136

Qus reconstruction of gou gu diagram and of its construction
65

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2015)

G. E. R. Lloyd is Emeritus Professor of Ancient Philosophy and Science at the University of Cambridge, Former Master of Darwin College, Cambridge, and Senior Scholar in Residence at the Needham Research Institute, Cambridge. He is the author of twenty-two books and editor of four, and was knighted for 'services to the history of thought' in 1997.

Bibliographic information