Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T17:41:03.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heteronormativity and/as Violence: The “Sexing” of Gwen Araujo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Moya Lloyd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper will examine the violence of heteronormativity: the violence that constitutes and regulates bodies according to normative notions of sex, gender, and sexuality. This violence, I will argue, requires more than a focus on gendered or sexualized physical harms of the kinds normally examined when studying violence against sexual minorities or women. Rather, it necessitates focusing on the multiple modalities through which heteronormativity performs its violence on, through, and against bodies and persons, including through the production of certain bodies and persons as inciting violence in their very being. To establish my argument, I explore the killing in 2002 of trans woman Gwen Araujo and the violence of the legal strategy (the trans panic defense) used in the legal trials that followed her killing. Both forms of violence, I suggest, operate in a similar way, albeit through different mechanisms, to maintain and extend the system of binary morphology that itself entails the perpetual violent materialization of sexed bodies.

Type
Open Issue Content
Information
Hypatia , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , Fall 2013 , pp. 818 - 834
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Hypatia, Inc

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Baldman, Anthony. 2006. Bill aims to eliminate gay/trans panic strategies in criminal trials. Gay and Lesbian Times, January 19.Google Scholar
Balzer, Carsten. 2009. Every third day the murder of a trans person is reported. Liminalis: Journal for Sex/Gender Emancipation and Resistance 3: 147–59.Google Scholar
Beasley, Chris. 2005. Gender and sexuality: Critical theories, critical thinkers. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren, and Warner, Michael. 1998. Sex in public. Critical Inquiry 24 (2): 547–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettcher, Talia Mae. 2006. Appearance, reality and gender deception: Reflections on transphobic violence and the politics of pretence. In Violence, victims, justifications: Philosophical approaches, ed. Ó Murchadha, Felix. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bettcher, Talia Mae. 2007. Evil deceivers and make‐believers: On transphobic violence and the politics of illusion. Hypatia 22 (3): 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, L. 1997. Queer problems/straight solutions: The limits of “official recognition.” In Playing with Fire, ed. Phelan, Shane. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brigham, Roger. 2006. TG panic bill weakened. The Bay Area Reporter, 24 April.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1992. Contingent foundations. In Feminists theorize the political, ed. Butler, Judith and Scott, Joan. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Tenth anniversary edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004a. Undoing gender. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004b. Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2007. Reply from Judith Butler to Mills and Jenkins. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 18 (2): 180–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Samuel A. 2007. Normative violence after 9/11: Rereading the politics of Gender Trouble. New Political Science 29 (1): 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Samuel A. 2009. The queer politics of television. London: I. B. Taurus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Christina Pei‐Lin. 2000. Provocation's privileged desire: The provocation doctrine, “homosexual panic,” and the non‐violent unwanted sexual advance defense. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 10: 195–235.Google Scholar
Corber, Robert J., and Valocchi, Stephen, eds. 2003. Queer studies: An interdisciplinary reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
DeFao, Janine, and John, Kelly St. 2004. Retrial in Araujo case presents challenges. San Francisco Chronicle, June 28.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1974. Of grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Finley, Lucinda M. 1989. Breaking women's silence in law: The dilemma of the gendered nature of legal reasoning. Notre Dame Law Review 64: 886–910.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. History of sexuality. Volume 1. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. The confession of the flesh. In Michel Foucault: Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. Brighton, Colin Gordon.: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1994 Truth and juridical forms. In Michel Foucault: Power. Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, vol. 3, ed. Faubion, James D.London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Golder, Ben. 2004. The homosexual advance defence and the law/body nexus: Towards a poetics of law reform. Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1351564 (accessed September 25, 2012).Google Scholar
Haddock, Vicki. 2004. “Gay panic” defense in Araujo case. San Francisco Chronicle, May 16.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Judith. 2005 In a queer time and place: Transgender bodies, subcultural lives. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hernandez, Lance. 2009. Wednesday: Closing arguments. Andrade murder trial blog. http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/19250576/detail.html (accessed November 5, 2011).Google Scholar
Hoge, Patrick. 2004. Defense calls transgender victim guilty of “deception and betrayal.” San Francisco Chronicle, April 16.Google Scholar
Howe, Adrian. 1997. More folk provoke their own demise (homophobic violence and sexed excuses—rejoining the provocation law debate, courtesy of the homosexual advance defence. Sydney Law Review 19 (3): 335–65.Google Scholar
Howells, Christina. 1999. Derrida: Deconstruction from phenomenology to ethics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Human Rights Commission. 2011. How do transgender people suffer from discrimination? http://2fwww.hrc.org/issues/1508.htm (accessed November 25, 2011).Google Scholar
Ingraham, Chrys, ed. 2005. Thinking straight: The power, the promise, and the paradox of heterosexuality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jackson, Stevi. 1999. Heterosexuality in question. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Jackson, Stevi. 2006. Gender, sexuality and heterosexuality: The complexity (and limits) of heteronormativity. Feminist Theory 7 (1): 105–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Fiona. 2007. Toward a nonviolent ethics: Response to Catherine Mills. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 18 (2): 157–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, 1995. The invention of heterosexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Keane, John. 2004. Violence and democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Cynthia. 2008. The gay panic defense. University of California, Davis, Law Review 42: 471–566.Google Scholar
Lee, Henry. 2004. Araujo begged for mercy. San Francisco Chronicle, April 27.Google Scholar
Lieber, Sally. n.d. AB1160 fact sheet: The Gwen Araujo Justice for Victims Act. Equality California.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Moya. 2007. Judith Butler: From norms to politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Gordene, and Marcel, Mary. 2009. Media coverage of the murder of U.S. transwomen of color. In Local violence, global media: Feminist analyses of gendered representations, ed. Cuklanz, Lisa M. and Moorti, Sujata. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
McDonald, Elisabeth. 2006. No straight answer: Homophobia as both an aggravating and mitigating factor in New Zealand homicide cases. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 37: 223–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle 2009. Gender violence: a cultural perspective. Oxford: Wiley‐Blackwell. Kindle edition.Google Scholar
Mills, Catherine. 2007. Normative violence, vulnerability, and responsibility. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 18 (2): 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). 2007. Hate crimes in the OSCE region: Incidents and responses. Annual report for 2006. Warsaw: OSCE.Google Scholar
People v. Merel, Cal: Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate Dist., 4th Div. 2009. http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar_case?case=7219233048697743719&hl=en&as_sdt=2,7 (accessed October 8, 2012).Google Scholar
Ray, Larry. 2011. Violence and society. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Diane, ed. 1996. Theorising heterosexuality. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Daniel. 2004. Violent democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilt, Kristen, and Westbrook, Laurel. 2009. Doing gender, doing heteronormativity: “Gender normals,” transgender people, and the social maintenance of heterosexuality. Gender and Society 23 (4):440–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, Andrew. 2006. From functionality to aesthetics: The architecture of transgender jurisprudence. In The Transgender Studies Reader, ed. Stryker, Susan and Whittle, Stephen. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
St. John, Kelly. 2004a. Nature of killing focus at end of Araujo case: Was transgender teen slain in heat of passion or revenge? San Francisco Chronicle, June 1.Google Scholar
St. John, Kelly. 2004b. Defense in Araujo trial gives final argument. San Francisco Chronicle, June 3.Google Scholar
St. John, Kelly. 2005. Teenager provoked own killing, attorney says. San Francisco Chronicle, August 30.Google Scholar
St. Pierre, Ethan. 2011. Statistics and other info. http://www.transgenderdor.org/?page_id=192 (accessed July 17, 2011).Google Scholar
Steinberg, Victoria L. 2005. A heat of passion offense: Emotions and bias in “trans panic” mitigation claims. Boston College Third World Law Review 25: 499–524.Google Scholar
Szymanski, Zak. 2005. Two murder convictions in Araujo case. Bay Area Reporter, September 15.Google Scholar
Szymanski, Zak. 2006a. Harris announces “panic defense” conference. http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/press/HarrisAnnoucesPanicDefenseConference (accessed November 16, 2009).Google Scholar
Szymanski, Zak. 2006b. DA convenes “panic” conference. http://www.law.ucla/williamsinstitute/press/DAConvenesPanicConference.html (accessed November 17, 2009).Google Scholar
Tilleman, Morgan. 2010. (Trans)forming the provocation defense. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 100 (4): 1659–88.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. 1991. Introduction: Fear of a queer planet. Social Text 29: 3–17.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael, ed. 1993. Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Whaley, Monte. 2008. Smile called “provoking act” in transgender case. Denver Post, September 19.Google Scholar
Wickberg, Daniel. 2000. Homophobia: On the cultural history of an idea. Critical Inquiry 27 (1): 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegman, Robyn. 2006. Heteronormativity and the desire for gender. Feminist Theory 7 (1): 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yep, Gust A. 2002. From homophobia and heterosexism to heteronormativity. Journal of Lesbian Studies 6 (3–4): 163–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed