Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T13:14:19.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the detection of emotional facial expressions: Are girls really better than boys?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2009

Vanessa LoBue
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904. vl8m@virginia.edujdeloache@virginia.edu
Judy S. DeLoache
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904. vl8m@virginia.edujdeloache@virginia.edu

Abstract

One facet of Vigil's socio-relational framework of expressive behaviors (SRFB) suggests that females are more sensitive to facial expressions than are males, and should detect facial expressions more quickly. A re-examination of recent research with children demonstrates that girls do detect various facial expressions more quickly than do boys. Although this provides support for SRFB, further examination of SRFB in children would lend important support this evolutionary-based theory.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Calvo, M. G., Avero, P. & Lundqvist, D. (2006) Facilitated detection of angry faces: Initial orienting and processing efficiency. Cognition and Emotion 20:785811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteves, F. (1999) Attentional bias to emotional facial expressions. European Review of Applied Psychology 49:9197.Google Scholar
Fox, E., Lester, V., Russo, R., Bowles, R. J., Pichler, A. & Dutton, K. (2000) Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cognition and Emotion 14:6192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilboa-Schechtman, E., Foa, E. B. & Amir, N. (1999) Attentional biases for facial expressions in social phobia: The face-in-the-crowd paradigm. Cognition and Emotion 13:305–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horstmann, G. & Bauland, A. (2006) Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect. Emotion 6:193207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LoBue, V. (2009) More than just a face in the crowd: Detection of emotional facial expressions in young children and adults. Developmental Science 12:305–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LoBue, V. & DeLoache, J. S. (2008) Detecting the snake in the grass: Attention to fear-relevant stimuli by adults and young children. Psychological Science 19:284–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LoBue, V. & DeLoache, J. S.(in press)Superior detection of threat-relevant stimuli in infancy. Developmental Science.Google Scholar
Lundqvist, D. & Öhman, A. (2005) Emotion regulates attention: The relation between facial configurations, facial emotion, and visual attention. Visual Cognition 12:5184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutchmaya, S. & Baron-Cohen, S. (2002) Human sex differences in social and non-social looking preferences, at 12 months of age. Infant Behavior and Development 25:319–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, M. & Knight, M. R. (2006) Angry faces get noticed quickly: Threat detection is not impaired among older adults. Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 61:P5457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D. & Esteves, F. (2001) The face in the crowd revisited: An anger superiority effect with schematic faces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80:381–96.Google Scholar
Schubo, A., Gendolla, G. H. E., Meinecke, C. & Abele, A. E. (2006) Detecting emotional faces and features in a visual search paradigm: Are faces special? Emotion 6:246–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar