Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Species are Processes: A Solution to the ‘Species Problem’ via an Extension of Ulanowicz’s Ecological Metaphysics

  • Invited Paper
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ‘species problem’ in the philosophy of biology concerns the nature of species. Various solutions have been proposed, including arguments that species are sets, classes, natural kinds, individuals, and homeostatic property clusters. These proposals parallel debates in ecology as to the ontology and metaphysics of populations, communities and ecosystems. A new solution—that species are processes—is proposed and defended, based on Robert Ulanowicz’s metaphysics of process ecology. As with ecological systems, species can be understood as emergent, autocatalytic systems with propensities for centripetality and mutuality in the course of dynamically balancing ascendency (order and persistence) and overhead (randomness and change). The species-as-processes perspective accords with the Ulanowicz’s postulates of process ecology and it can be accommodated by existing theories of species—particularly in a reframing of Richard Boyd’s metaphysics such that species are homeostatic process clusters. Rather than contending that process-based metaphysics is the only, best or true account of species, a pluralist-realist approach is advocated based on the pragmatic principles that are reflected in modern view of species and ecology. If species are understood to be comprised of processes and to be emergent processes themselves, there are important implications for the life sciences, including: animal models in medical and environmental studies, conservation biology, extinction, biodiversity, restoration ecology, and evolutionary biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayala FJ, Arp R (2009) Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology. Wiley-Blackwell, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson G (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind. Ballantine Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhardt MH, Campbell DT (1999) Emergence. In: Anderson PB, Emmeche C, Finnemann NO, Christensen PV (eds) Downward causation. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R (1999) Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In: Wilson RA (ed) Species: new interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw AD (2000) What do we mean by restoration? In: Urbanska KM, Webb NR, Edwards PJ (eds) Restoration ecology and sustainable development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown B, de Laplante K, Peacock K (2011) Philosophy of ecology. Elsevier (North Holland), New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck RC, Hull DL (1966) The logical structure of the Linnaean hierarchy. Syst Zool 15:97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns J (1988) Increasing diversity by restoring damaged ecosystems. In: Wilson EO (ed) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM, O’Doherty G (1999) On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conserv Biol 13:805–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements FE (1936) Nature and the structure of climax. J Ecol 24:252–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds W (2009) Laws, theories and patterns in ecology. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donlan CJ, Berger J, Bock CE, Bock JH, Burney DA, Estes JA, Foreman D, Martin PS, Roemer GW, Smith FA, Soule ME, Greene HW (2006) Pleistocene rewilding: an optimistic agenda for twenty-first century conservation. Am Nat 168:660–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1969) A causal phenomena in physics and biology: a case for reconstruction. Am Sci 57:465–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1981) A form of logic suited for biology? In: Rosen R (ed) Progress in theoretical biology, vol 6. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ereshefsky M (1992) The units of evolution: essays on the nature of species. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ereshefsky M (1999) Species and the Linnaean hierarchy. In: Wilson RA (ed) Species: new interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (1966) On psychologism in the logic of taxonomic controversies. Syst Zool 15:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (1969) The triumph of the Darwinian method. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (1974) A radical solution to the species problem. Syst Zool 23:536–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass B (1960) Eighteenth-century concepts of the origin of species. Proc Am Philos Soc 104:227–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant V (1981) Plant speciation. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg JR (1950) Taxonomy, language and reality. Am Nat 84:419–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths GCD (1974) On the foundations of biological systematics. Acta Biotheor 23:85–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull DL (1976a) Are species really individuals? Syst Zool 25:174–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull DL (1976b) The ontological status of biological species. In: Butts R, Hintikka J (eds) Boston studies in the philosophy of science, vol 32. D. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull DL (1978) A matter of individuality. Philos Sci 45:335–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull DL, Ruse M (1998) The philosophy of biology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (2011) http://caat.jhsph.edu/. Accessed 27 April 2011

  • Keller DR, Golley FB (2000) The philosophy of ecology: from science to synthesis. University of Georgia Press, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher P (1984) Species. Philos Sci 51:308–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitts DB, Kitts DJ (1979) Biological species as natural kinds. Philos Sci 46:613–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolasa J, Pickett STA (1991) Ecological heterogeneity. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Korey K (1984) The essential Darwin. Little, Brown & Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman H (1967) Are biological species real? Philos Sci 34:157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JA (2004a) Locust: the devastating rise and mysterious disappearance of the insect that shaped the American frontier. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JA (2004b) Tales from a species’ crypt. Conserv Pract 5:20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JA (2010) The fate of the Rocky Mountain locust, Melanoplus spretus Walsh: implications for conservation biology. Terr Arthropod Rev 3:129–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood DR, Lockwood JA (1997) Evidence of self-organized criticality in insect populations. Complexity 2:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock J (2000) Gaia: a new look at life on earth. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclaurin J, Sterelny K (2008) What is biodiversity?. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RW, Matthews JR (2009) Insect behavior. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1976) Is the species a class or an individual? Syst Zool 25:192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann KS (2000) The diversity-stability debate. Nature 405:228–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler B, Donoghue M (1982) Species concepts: a case for pluralism. Syst Zool 31:491–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker KA, Seabrook-Davison M, Ewen JG (2010) Opportunities for nonnative ecological replacements in ecosystem restoration. Restor Ecol 18:269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL (1991) The balance of nature? Ecological issues in the conservation of species and communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1990) A world of propensities. Thoemmes, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine WVO (1969) Natural kinds. In: Quine WVO (ed) Ontological relativity and other essays. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiners WA, Lockwood JA (2010) Philosophical foundations for the practices of ecology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N (2008) Process philosophy. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/process-philosophy/. Accessed 26 April 2011

  • Rheinberger H-J, Müller-Wille S (2009) Genes. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/gene/. Accessed 26 April 2011

  • Rosenberg A, McShea DW (2007) Philosophy of biology: a contemporary introduction. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J (2004) Evolution’s rainbow: diversity, gender, and sexuality in nature and people. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse M (1969) Definitions of species in biology. Brit J Philos Sci 20:97–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse M (1971) The species problem: a reply to Hull. Brit J Philos Sci 22:369–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse M (1998) Philosophy of biology. Prometheus, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Serafini A (2001) The epic history of biology. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro G (1973) Habit and meaning in Peirce’s pragmatism. Trans Charles S Peirce Soc 9:24–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Shayne CG (2006) Animal models in toxicology. Informa Healthcare, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E (1993) Philosophy of biology. Westview, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (1999) Species as ecological mosaics. In: Wilson RA (ed) Species: new interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend CR, Begon M, Harper JL (2003) Essentials of ecology. Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (1995) Ecosystem trophic foundations. In: Patterson BC, Jorgensen SE (eds) Complex ecology: the part-whole relation in ecosystems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (1997) Ecology, the ascendent perspective. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (2001) The organic in ecology. Ludus Vitales 9:183–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (2005) Fluctuations and order in ecosystem dynamics. Emerg Complex Organ 7:14–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (2009) A third window: natural life beyond Newton and Darwin. Templeton Foundation Press, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba ES (1995) Species as habitat-specific complex systems. In: Lambert DM, Spencer HG (eds) Speciation and the recognition concept: theory and applications. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA, Hayward GD, Holthausen RS, Wisdom MJ (2008) Using surrogate species and groups for conservation planning and management. BioScience 58:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmers CC (2004) The role of wolves as a keystone species: Examining the ecological effects and conservation implications of a reintroduced top predator on the scavenger guild, Yellowstone National Park. US Environmental Protection Agency website http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncer_abstracts/index.cfm/fuseaction/display.abstractDetail/abstract/6782/report/0. Accessed 27 April 2011

  • Wilson EO (1980) Sociobiology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1988) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt WC (2000) Emergence as non-aggregativity and the biases of reductionism(s). Found Sci 5:269–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski LT (2008) On epistemology. Wadsworth, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorach AC, Ulanowicz RE (2003) Quantifying the complexity of flow networks: how many roles are there? Complexity 8:68–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey A. Lockwood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lockwood, J.A. Species are Processes: A Solution to the ‘Species Problem’ via an Extension of Ulanowicz’s Ecological Metaphysics. Axiomathes 22, 231–260 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-011-9169-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-011-9169-5

Keywords

Navigation