Reflection and the Stability of Belief: Essays on Descartes, Hume, and Reid

Front Cover
Oxford University Press, 2010 - Philosophy - 369 pages
A unifying theme of Loeb's work is epistemological - that Descartes and Hume advance theories of knowledge that rely on a substantial 'naturalistic' component, adopting one or another member of a cluster of psychological properties of beliefs as the goal of inquiry and the standard for assessing belief-forming mechanisms. Thus Loeb shows a surprising affinity between the epistemologies of the two figures -- surprising because they are often thought of as polar opposites in this respect.Descartes and Hume are unique in that their philosophical texts are accessible beyond just a narrow audience in the history of philosophy; their ideas continue to be a vital part of the field at large. This volume will thus appeal to advanced students and scholars not just in the history of early modern philosophy but in epistemology and other core areas of the discipline.
 

Contents

Introduction
3
1 Is There Radical Dissimulation in Descartes Meditations? 1986
34
2 The Priority of Reason in Descartes 1990
58
3 The Cartesian Circle 1992
89
On Securing Settled Doxastic States 1998
117
5 Integrating Humes Accounts of Belief and Justification 2001
143
6 Humes Explanations of Meaningless Beliefs 2001
165
7 Hume on Stability Justification and Unphilosophical Probability 1995
184
8 Humes Agentcentered Sentimentalism 2003
214
9 What Is Worth Preserving in the Kemp Smith Interpretation of Hume? 2009
245
10 Psychology Epistemology and Skepticism in Humes Argument about Induction 2006
270
11 Locke and British Empiricism forthcoming
288
12 The Naturalisms of Hume and Reid 2007
308
Bibliography
333
Index
353

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2010)

Louis E. Loeb is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Michigan.

Bibliographic information