Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate Social Performance, Stakeholder Orientation, and Organizational Moral Development

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article begins with an explanation of how moral development for organizations has parallels to Kohlberg's categorization of the levels of individual moral development. Then the levels of organizational moral development are integrated into the literature on corporate social performance by relating them to different stakeholder orientations. Finally, the authors propose a model of organizational moral development that emphasizes the role of top management in creating organizational processes that shape the organizational and institutional components of corporate social performance. This article represents one approach to linking the distinct streams of business ethics and business-and-society research into a more complete understanding of how managers and firms address complex ethical and social issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowie, N. E.: 1991, ‘Challenging the Egoistic Paradigm’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1(10, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, S. N. and P. L. Cochran: 1991, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: Implications for Business and Society Theory and Research’, in J. F. Mahon (ed.), International Association for Business and Society Proceedings, pp. 449–467.

  • Burke, L. and J. M. Logsdon: 1996, ‘How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off’, Long Range Planning 29, 493–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L., J. M. Logsdon, W. Mitchell, M. Reiner and D. Vogel: 1986, ‘Corporate Community Involvement in the San Francisco Bay Area’, California Management Review 28(3), 122–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1995, ‘Stakeholder Thinking in Three Models of Management Morality: A Perspective with Strategic Implications’, in J. Nasi (ed.), Understanding Stakeholder Thinking (LSR Publications, Helsinki, Finland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, G. F., D. J. Moberg and M. G. Velasquez: 1981, ‘The Ethics of Organizational Politics’, Academy of Management Review 6, 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. B. E.: 1995, ‘A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Review 20, 92–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. V.: 1995a, ‘Creating Ethical Work Climates: A Socio-Economic Perspective’, Journal of Socio-Economics 24, 317–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. V.: 1995b, ‘Moral Climate in Business Firms: A Framework for Empirical Research’, Academy of Management 1995 Best Paper Proceedings.

  • Colby, A., L. Kohlberg, J. Gibbs and M. Lieberman: 1983, ‘A Longitudinal Study of Moral Development’, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 48(1, 2), Series #200, 1–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T.: 1982, Corporations and Morality (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and L. E. Preston: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’, Academy of Management Review 20, 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T. W.: 1991, ‘Business Ethics and Extant Social Contracts’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1), 23–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N. S., J. P. Rushton and H. L. Roediger: 1978, ‘Productivity and Scholarly Impact’, American Psychologist 33, 1064–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, E. M.: 1987, ‘The Corporate Social Policy Process: Beyond Business Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Social Responsiveness’, California Management Review 29(3), 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraedrich, J., D. M. Thorne and O. C. Ferrell: 1994, ‘Assessing the Application of Cognitive Moral Development to Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 829–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1994, ‘The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 409–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. and D. R. Gilbert, Jr.: 1988, Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1995, ‘Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics’, Academy of Management Review 20, 404–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1969, ‘Stage and Sequence’, in D. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1976, ‘Moral Stages and Moralization’, in T. Likona (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior (Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York, NY), pp. 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1981, Essays on Moral Development. Vol. 1: The Philosophy of Moral Development (Harper and Row, San Francisco, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, W. B.: 1994, ‘Measuring Corporate Social Performance: A Stakeholder Approach’, in S. Wartick and D. Collins (eds.), International Association for Business and Society Proceedings, pp. 247–252.

  • Lerner, L. D. and G. D. Fryxell: 1994, ‘CEO Stakeholder Attitudes and Corporate Social Activity in the Fortune 500’, Business & Society 33, 58–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitnick, B. M.: 1995, ‘Systematics and CSR: The Theory and Processes of Normative Referencing’, Business & Society 34(1), 5–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J. E. and B. W. Altman: 1992, ‘Models of Corporate Greening: How Corporate Social Policy and Organizational Learning Inform Leading-Edge Environmental Management’, in J. E. Post (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, L. E. and J. E. Post: 1975, Private Management and Public Policy (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, D. P. and T. M. Jones: 1995, ‘An Agent Morality View of Business Policy’, Academy of Management Review 20, 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, A. and M. F. Flaherty: 1992, Corporate Responses to Environmental Challenges: Initiatives by Multinational Management (Quorum Books, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E. and D. P. Ribin: 1991, ‘A Conceptual Model of Corporate Moral Development’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V. and P. A. Fouts: 1996, ‘A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability’, working paper, University of Oregon.

  • Sethi, S. P.: 1987, ‘The Expanding Scope of Executive Liability (Criminal and Civil) for Corporate Law Violations’, in S. P. Sethi and C. M. Falbe (eds.), Business and Society: Dimensions of Conflict and Cooperation (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA), pp. 471–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar, B. S. and A. Cambrun: 1993, ‘Stages of Moral Development of Corporations’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 727–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. L.: 1995, ‘Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model’, Academy of Management Review 20, 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’, Academy of Management Review 11, 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1992, ‘Moral Reasoning and Business Ethics: Implications for Research, Education, and Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 445–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M. G.: 1982, Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, B. and J. Cullen: 1988, ‘The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates’, Administrative Science Quarterly 33, 101–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D.: 1978, Lobbying the Corporation: Citizen Challenges to Business Authority (Basic Books, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R.: 1993, ‘Corporate Codes of Ethics: Purpose, Process and Content Issues’, Business & Society 32, 44–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., L. K. Trevino and P. L. Cochran: 1994, ‘Ethics Initiatives and Organizational Legitimacy’, in S. Wartick and D. Collins (eds.), International Association for Business and Society Proceedings, pp. 56–61.

  • Weber, J.: 1993, ‘Institutionalizing Ethics into Business Organizations: A Model and Research Agenda’, Business Ethics Quarterly 3, 419–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J.: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, Academy of Management Review 16, 691–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J. and R. E. Jones: 1995, ‘Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance’, The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3, 229–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuthas, K.: 1997, ‘Organizational Moral Development: Lessons From Moral Reasoning Frameworks’, Research on Accounting Ethics, forthcoming.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Anderson Schools of Management, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131

    Jeanne M. Logsdon & Kristi Yuthas

Authors
  1. Jeanne M. Logsdon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristi Yuthas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Logsdon, J.M., Yuthas, K. Corporate Social Performance, Stakeholder Orientation, and Organizational Moral Development. Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1213–1226 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005741931995

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005741931995

Keywords

Search

Navigation