Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Deception in Business Networks: Is It Easier to Lie Online?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article synthesizes research presented in several models of unethical behavior to develop propositions about the factors that facilitate and mitigate deception in online business communications. The work expands the social network perspective to incorporate the medium of communication as a significant influence on deception. We go beyond existing models by developing seven propositions that identify how social network and issue moral intensity characteristics influence the probability of deception in online business communication in comparison to traditional communication channels. Remedies to detect and discourage deception in online business networks are also offered, as well as limitations and future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agre, P.E.: 2002, ‘Real-Time Politics: The Internet and Political Process’, Information Society 18, 311-331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C.R.: 2002, ‘Crime, Fraud and Deceit on the Internet: Is There Hyperreality in Cyberspace?’ Critical Perspectives on Accounting 13, 1-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balestra, M., and A. Cabot: 2004, Internet Gambling Report: An Evolving Conflict between Technology and Law, 7th ed., (River City Group, LLC, St. Charles, MO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, S.: 1978, Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life, (Pantheon Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S.P., and P.C. Foster: 2003, ‘The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology’. Journal of Management 29, 991-1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D.J., K.D. Butterfield, and B.C. Skaggs: 1998, ‘Relationships and Unethical Behavior: A Social Network Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 23, 14-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D.J., J. Galaskiewicz, H.R.Greve, and W. Tsai: 2004, ‘Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective’, Academy of Management Journal 47: 795-817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.E., L.K. Trevino, and D.A. Harrison: 2005, ‘Ethical Leadership: A Social Learning Perspective for Construct Development and Testing’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97, 117-134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J.K., and J.F. Nunamaker Jr.: 2004, ‘Toward Computer-aided Support for the Detection of Deception’, Group Decision and Negotiation 13: 1-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, A., and L.S. Mee: 2000, ‘The Effects of Issue Characteristics on the Recognition of Moral Issues’, Journal of Business Ethics 27(3), 255-269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, B., and D.C. Lundgren: 2001, ‘Love on the Internet: Involvement and Misrepresentation in Romantic Relationships in Cyberspace vs. Realspace’, Computers in Human Behavior 17, 197-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R.L., and R.H. Lengel: 1986, ‘Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design’, Management Science 32(5), 554-571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B.M., J.J. Lindsay, B.E. Malone, L. Muhlenbruck, K. Charlton, and H. Cooper: 2003, ‘Cues to Deception’, Psychological Bulletin 129, 74-118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducheneaut, N.B.: 2002, ‘The Social Impacts of Electronic Mail in Organizations: A Case Study of Electronic Power Games Using Communication Genres’, Information, Communication & Society 5(2), 153-188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M.S.: 1987, ‘Electronic Mail and Weak Ties in Organizations’, Information Technology and People 3, 83-101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A.B., D. Bukatko, M. Hallahan, and M. Crawford: 2007, ‘The Medium Makes a Difference: Gender Similarities and Differences in Instant Messaging’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26, 389-397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J., and R. Burt: 1991, ‘Interorganization Contagion in Corporate Philanthropy’, Administrative Science Quarterly 36, 88-105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, M.A., and R. Abzug: 2002, ‘Institutionalizing Identity: Symbolic Isomorphism and Organizational Names’, Academy of Management Journal 45, 267-280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.: 1973, ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology 78, 1360-1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.: 1985, ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology 91, 481-510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grazioli, S.: 2004: Where Did They Go Wrong? An Analysis of the Failure of Knowledgeable Internet Consumers to Detect Deception over the Internet’, Group Decision and Negotiation 13, 149-172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, J.T.: 2007, ‘Digital Deception: Why, When and How People Lie Online’, in A.N. Joinson, K.Y.A. McKenna, T. Postmes, and U-D. Reips (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology, (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), pp. 289-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, J.T., L.E. Curry, S. Goorha, and M. Woodworth: 2008, On Lying and Being Lied to: A Linguistic Analysis of Deception in Computer-mediated Communication’, Discourse Processes 45, 1-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Internet Crime Complaint Center: 2008, ‘2007 Internet Crime Report’, National White Collar Crime Center, http://www.ic3.gov/media/annualreports.aspx.

  • Jones, T.M.: 1991, ‘Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model’, Academy of Management Review 16, 366-395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., W.S. Hesterly, and S.P. Borgatti: 1997, ‘A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms’, Academy of Management Review 22(4), 911-945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzberg, T.R., C.E. Naquin, and L.Y. Belkin: 2005, ‘Electronic Performance Appraisals: The Effects of E-mail Communication on Peer Ratings in Actual and Simulated Environments’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 98, 216-226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. S.: 1994, ‘Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation’, MIS Quarterly 18(2), 143-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., M.A. Glynn, and G.F. Davis: 2007, ‘Community Isomorphism and Corporate Social Action’, Academy of Management Review 32, 925-945.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, J.M. and R.J. Harvey: 2006, ‘An Analysis of the Factor Structure of Jones’ Moral Intensity Construct’, Journal of Business Ethics 64, 381-404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S.A. and R.A. McDonald: 1995, ‘The Role of Moral Intensity in Moral Judgments: An Empirical Investigation’, Journal of Business Ethics 14(9), 715-726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papakyriazis, N. V. and M. A. Boudourides: 2001, ‘Electronic Weak Ties in Network Organisations’, Paper Presented at the 4th GOR Conference, Gottingen, Germany.

  • Patterson, K. D. W., M. Washington, D. Cavazos and K. Brigham: 2010, `Process and Emergence in Contested Terrain', International Journal of Organizational Analysis 18(1), 105–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E.H.: 2004, ‘Learning When and How to Lie: A Neglected Aspect of Organizational and Occupational Socialization’, Human Relations 57, 260-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M.S.: 1996, ‘The Role of Moral Intensity and Fairness Perception in Judgments of Ethicality: A Comparison of Managerial Professionals and the General Public’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 459-474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M.S., and A.E. Singer: 1997, ‘Observer Judgments about Moral Agents’ Ethical Decisions: The Role of Scope of Justice and Moral Intensity’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 473-484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., S.J. Vitell, and K.L. Kraft: 1996, ‘Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-making of Marketing Professionals’, Journal of Business Research 36, 245-255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slote, M.: 2007, The Ethics of Care and Empathy, (Routledge, Oxford, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproull, L. and S. Kiesler: 1986, ‘Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication’, Management Science 32, 1492-1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.K.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision-making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’, Academy of Management Review 11, 601-617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utz, S.: 2005, ‘Types of Deception and Underlying Motivation: What People Think’, Social Science Computer Review 23, 49-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, P.: 1999, The Psychology of the Internet, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watley, L.D., and D.R. May: 2004, ‘Enhancing Moral Intensity: The Roles of Personal and Consequential Information in Ethical Decision-making’, Journal of Business Ethics 50, 105-126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., J. Salaff, D. Dimitrova, L. Garton, M. Gulia, and C. Haythornthwaite: 1996, ‘Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community’, Annual Review of Sociology 22, 213-238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, M.T., and A.N. Joinson: 2009, Truth, Lies and Trust on the Internet, (Routledge, New York).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Anderson School of Management, MSC05 3090, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131-0001, U.S.A.

    Jeanne M. Logsdon & Karen D. W. Patterson

Authors
  1. Jeanne M. Logsdon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karen D. W. Patterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeanne M. Logsdon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Logsdon, J.M., Patterson, K.D.W. Deception in Business Networks: Is It Easier to Lie Online?. J Bus Ethics 90 (Suppl 4), 537–549 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0605-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0605-z

Key words

Search

Navigation