Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 21, 2019

Seneca on Human Rights in De Beneficiis 3

  • Alex Long EMAIL logo
From the journal Apeiron

Abstract

The paper discusses Seneca’s phrase ‘human rights’ (ius humanum) in On Benefits 3 and relates the passage to recent debates about human rights in Stoicism and ancient philosophy. I argue that the Latin phrase refers either to rights or to a law conferring rights. The difference between the passage and a common expectation for human rights lies in the kind of relation between right and duty. In Seneca’s passage the right does not in itself have a correlative duty on the part of other people, and yet it does, if exercised through benefactions, create a duty in others. By contrast, the relation between right and duty is usually expected to be unconditional.

References

Basore, J. W. 1935. Seneca: Moral Essays, vol. 3. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bett, R. 2012. “Did the Stoics Invent Human Rights?” In Virtue and Happiness: Essays in Honour of Julia Annas, Supplementary Volume of Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, edited by R. Kamtekar, 149–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646043.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Bradley, K. R. 2008. “Seneca and Slavery.” In Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Seneca, edited by J. G. Fitch, 335–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brownlee, K. 2013. “A Human Right against Social Deprivation.” Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251): 199–222.10.1111/1467-9213.12018Search in Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. 2012. “Did the Ancient Greeks Have the Concept of Human Rights?” In his Explorations in Ancient and Modern Philosophy, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M., and J. F. Procopé. 1995. Seneca: Moral and Political Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Donahue, C. Jr. 2001. “Ius in the Subjective Sense in Roman Law. Reflections on Villey and Tierney.” In A Ennio Cortese, edited by D. Maffei, I. Birocchi, M. Caravale, E. Conte, and U. Petronio, 506–35. Rome: Il Cigno Edizioni.Search in Google Scholar

Donahue, C., Jr 2010. “Ius in Roman Law.” In Christianity and Human Rights: An Introduction, edited by J. Witte, Jr, and F. S. Alexander, 64–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511761713.004Search in Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously, New Impression with a Reply to Critics. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar

Fordyce, C. J. 1977. Virgil: Aeneid VII–VIII, edited by J. D. Christie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Frede, M. 2011. A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought, edited by A. A. Long. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1525/california/9780520268487.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Garnsey, P. 1996. Ideas of Slavery from Aristotle to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Griffin, M. 1992. Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Griffin, M. 2013. Seneca on Society: A Guide to De Beneficiis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780199245482.book.1Search in Google Scholar

Griffin, M., and B. Inwood. 2011. Seneca: On Benefits. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226748290.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hohfeld, W. N. 1919. Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. 2000. Virgil, Aeneid 7: A Commentary. Leiden, Boston and Köln: Brill.10.1163/9789004351233Search in Google Scholar

Inwood, B. 2005. Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

O’Neill, O. 2005. “The Dark Side of Human Rights.” International Affairs 81: 427–39.10.4324/9781315253510-6Search in Google Scholar

Préchac, F. 1926–1927. Sénèque: Des Bienfaits, vol. 2. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Tasioulas, J. 2007. “The Moral Reality of Human Rights.” In Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor? edited by T. Pogge, 75–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tierney, B. 1997. The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law, and Church Law 1150-1625. Grand Rapids, Michigan and Cambridge: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Wenar, L. 2005. “The Nature of Rights.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (3): 223–52.10.4324/9781315244129-13Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-08-21
Published in Print: 2021-04-27

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/apeiron-2019-0019/html
Scroll to top button