Skip to main content
Log in

The heroic age of American avant-garde art

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A major contribution of Pierre Bourdieu to the study of art was his analysis of the autonomization of modern art fields. His model of autonomy and legitimacy in modern art was based on a study of the genesis of an avant-garde in French art in the late nineteenth century. I argue that a similar autonomization of art occurred in the mid-twentieth century in the United States. I present studies in music and film to demonstrate the genesis of an American avant-garde during this period. This general process of autonomization until now has been neglected in the work of sociologists and historians on American art. My analysis shows that the genesis of principles of autonomy in the United States, unlike France, developed in what were considered the high and popular arts. These case studies reveal a failure in Bourdieu’s model to account for the role of culture industries and popular artists in the autonomization of modern art fields. I show how the American art field generated a subfield of autonomous art that included both avant-garde high art and independent popular art. This permanent subfield of avant-garde and independent art became central to future struggles over autonomy and innovation in American art.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this article, assume Bourdieu’s key arguments are in both these works unless otherwise cited.

  2. The New Deal WPA in the 1930s acted as an important incubator for post-war avant-garde American artists with the Federal Arts Project, Federal Music Project, and Federal Theater Project. See McDonald (1969) and Bindas (1996).

  3. Minimalism and rock can be viewed as next generation expressions of the earlier genres of experimental music and rock ‘n’ roll discussed in this essay (Ennis 1992; Gillett 1983; Hitchcock 1988).

  4. Folk music was another genre in the social space of autonomous music. But unlike experimental music, modern jazz, and rock ‘n’ roll, this genre community collected and performed “traditional” folk music. In the 1960s, when songwriters like Bob Dylan took center stage in the folk music revival, this community still resisted new forms of performance. Dylan discovered this orthodoxy with the disastrous reception of his “electric” set at the 1965 Newport Folk Festival. See Cantwell (1996), Eyerman and Barretta (1996), and Garofalo (1997) on the folk music genre.

  5. Both Ennis (1992) and Roy (2004) point to African American and southern white music becoming distinct industry genres in the 1920s. They remained distinct genres into the 1950s, although their names changed overtime: “race” to “rhythm and blues” and “hillbilly” to “country-western” to “country.”

  6. Capital became a major label by the end of the 1940s.

  7. The Art Cinema movement had roots in early cinema. Art film institutions emerged as early as the 1920s. The Modern Museum of Art in New York City, for example, established a Film Archive in 1935. MOMA played a role in exposing American audiences to the Art Cinema Movement in the 1950s and 1960s (Thompson and Bordwell 2003).

  8. The erosion of the Production Code in the 1950s, with its final elimination in 1966, was also a major factor in the broadening of content and style found in the exploitation and auteur film genres (Thompson and Bordwell 2003).

  9. Pauline Kael wrote reviews of Bonnie and Clyde, The Graduate, and Easy Rider.

References

  • Adorno, T. W. (1991). The culture industry. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, V. D. (2003). Sociology of art: Exploring fine and popular forms. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altschuler, G. C. (2004). All shook up: How rock ‘n’ roll changed America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aneesh, A., Hall, L., & Petro, P. (Eds.). (2012). Beyond globalization: Making new worlds in media, art, and social practices. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, S. (2007). Hollywood highbrow: From entertainment to art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayma, T. (1995). Art world culture and institutional choices: the case of experimental film. The Sociological Quarterly, 36(1), 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A., & Peterson, R. A. (Eds.). (2004). Music scenes: Local, translocal, and virtual. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, D. W. (2002). Music I: To the late 1940s. In D. Nichols (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to John Cage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindas, K. J. (1996). All this music belongs to the nation: The WPA’s Federal Music Project and American society. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biskind, P. (1998). Easy riders, raging bulls. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, J. R. (1991). The disjunction history of U.S. museums, 1869–1980. Social Forces, 70(1), 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, D., Staiger, J., & Thompson, K. (1985). The classical Hollywood cinema: Film style and mode of production to 1960. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boschetti, A. (2006). Bourdieu’s work on literature: contexts, stakes and perspectives. Theory Culture & Society, 23(6), 135–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1996). The rules of art. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). Photography: A middle brow art. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broyles, M. (2004). Mavericks and other traditions in American music. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bystryn, M. N. (1981). Variation in artistic circles. The Sociological Quarterly, 22, 120–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, C. M. (1996). Dialectic in the arts: The rise of experimentalism in American music. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, R. (1996). When we were good: The folk revival. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. (1992). The production of culture: Media and the urban arts. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. (1987). The transformation of the avant-garde: The New York art world, 1940–1985. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1992). Cultural boundaries and structural change: The extension of the high culture model to theater, opera, and the dance, 1900–1940. In M. Lamont & M. Fournier (Eds.), Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1991). Social structure, institutions and cultural goods: The case of the United States. In P. Bourdieu & J. S. Coleman (Eds.), Social theory for a changing society. San Francisco: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural entrepreneurship in nineteenth century Boston: the creation of an organizational base for high culture in America. Media Culture and Society, 4, 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, T. (2007). The sociology of music. In C. D. Bryant & D. L. Beck (Eds.), 21st century sociology: A reference handbook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, P. H. (1992). The seventh stream: The emergence of rock-n-roll in American popular music. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyerman, R., & Barretta, S. (1996). From the 30s to the 60s: the folk music revival in the United States. Theory and Society, 25(4), 501–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, B. (1997). Pierre Bourdieu and cultural theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. J. (1975). Popular culture and high culture: An analysis and evaluation of taste. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, D. (1980). A players place: The story of the Actors Studio. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo, R. (1997). Rockin’ out: Popular music in the USA. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelder, K., & Thornton, S. (Eds.). (1997). The subcultures reader. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, C. (1983). The sound of the city: The rise of rock and roll. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, B. (2000). The invisible art: New music in America. In J. Heintze & M. Saffle (Eds.), Reflections on American music: The twentieth century and the new millennium: A collection of essays presented in honor of the college music society. Hillsdale: Pendragon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grazian, D. (2003). Blue Chicago: The search for authenticity in urban blues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenfell, M., & Hardy, C. (2007). Art rules: Pierre Bourdieu and the visual arts. New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (1992). The capital(s) of cultures: A nonholistic approach to status situations, class, gender, and ethnicity. In M. Lamont & M. Fournier (Eds.), Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, D., & Tiso, E. (2009). The sociology of the new art gallery scene in Chelsea, Manhattan. In J. Amariglio, J. W. Childers, & S. E. Cullenberg (Eds.), Sublime economy: On the intersection of art and commerce. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (1980). Introduction to critical theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D. (2006). Bourdieu, the media and cultural production. Media Culture & Society, 28(2), 211–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, P. M. (1972). Processing fads and fashions: an organization-set analysis of culture industry systems. American Journal of Sociology, 77, 639–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, H. W. (1988). Music in the United States: A historical introduction (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyssen, A. (1986). After the great divide: Modernism, mass culture, and postmodernism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglis, D., & Hughson, J. (Eds.). (2005). The sociology of art: Ways of seeing. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurt, J. (2001). Autonomy and commitment in the French literary field: applying Pierre Bourdieu’s approach. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 38(1), 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammen, M. (1999). American culture, American tastes: Social change and the 20th century. New York: A. A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lena, J. C. (2012). Banding together: How communities create genres in popular music. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (2007). Independent film. In B. K. Grant (Ed.), Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film. New York: Schirmer Reference. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 9 June 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipstadt, H. (2003). Can ‘art professions’ be Bourdieuean fields of cultural production? The case of the architecture competition. Cultural Studies, 17(3–4), 390–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, M., Dovey, J., Giddings, S., Grant, I., & Kelly, K. (2009). New media: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, P. (2009). Demanding respect: The evolution of the American comic book. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, P. (2002). The rise of a jazz art world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, P. (2000). Pierre Bourdieu’s fields of cultural production: A case study of jazz. In N. Brown & I. Szeman (Eds.), Pierre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in culture. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, P. (1999). Diffusion and syncretism: the modern jazz tradition. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, P. D. (1992). Innovation and diversity in the popular music industry, 1969–1990. American Sociological Review, 57(1), 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby, R. (2003). Hollywood cinema (2nd ed.). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, W. F. (1969). Federal relief administration and the arts. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, D. (1998). Avant-garde and experimental music. In D. Nichols (Ed.), The Cambridge history of American music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nyman, M. (1999). Experimental music: Cage and beyond (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A. (1990). Why 1955? Explaining the advent of rock music. Popular Music, 9(1), 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A. (1994). Cultural studies through the production perspective: Progress and prospects. In D. Crane (Ed.), The sociology of culture: Emerging theoretical perspectives. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A., & Anand, N. (2004). The production of culture perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A., & Kern, R. M. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: from snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 16(5), 900–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, J., Kuhn, L., & Garrett, C. H. (2013). Cage, John. Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://0-www.oxfordmusic-online.com.library.colgate.edu/subscriber/article/grove/music/A2223954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regev, M. (1994). Producing artistic value: the case of rock music. The Sociological Quarterly, 35(1), 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renan, S. (1967). An introduction to the American underground film. New York: E. P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revell, D. (1992). The roaring silence: A life. New York: Arcade Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, G. (2012). Climbing the charts: What radio airplay tells us about the diffusion of innovation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, W. G. (2004). ‘Race records’ and ‘hillbilly music:’ institutional origins of racial categories in the American commercial recording industry. Poetics, 32, 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, W. G., & Dowd, T. (2010). What is sociological about music? Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. (1985). The production of culture in the music industry: The ASCAP-BMI controversy. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. (2000). Pragmatist aesthetics: Living, beauty, rethinking art (2nd ed.). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitney, P. A. (2002). Visionary film: The American avant-garde, 1943–2000 (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitney, P. A. (Ed.). (1970). Film culture reader. Reprint. New York: Cooper Square Press 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, R. (1994). Movie-made America: A cultural history of American movies. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares, J. M. (2010). Grassroots modern: New York dancers take the country. Humanities, 31(5), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. C. (1979). The fine arts in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichmann, H. (1981). Fonda: My life. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, K., & Bordwell, D. (2003). Film history: An introduction. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, S. (2008). Seven days in the art world. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, S. (1996). Club cultures: Music, media and subcultural capital. Hanover: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, P. (1995). Underground film: A critical history. New York: De Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolberg, V. L. (2007). The sociology of art. In C. D. Bryant & D. L. Peck (Eds.), 21st century sociology: A reference handbook, Volume 2. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolberg, V. L. (1990). Constructing a sociology of the arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zolberg, V. L., & Cherbo, J. M. (1997). Outsider art: Contesting boundaries in contemporary culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Lopes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lopes, P. The heroic age of American avant-garde art. Theor Soc 44, 219–249 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-015-9244-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-015-9244-9

Keywords

Navigation