Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Preaching to Investing: Attitudes of Religious Organisations Towards Responsible Investment

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Religious organisations are major investors with sometimes substantial investment volumes. An important question for them is how to make investments in, and to earn returns from, companies and activities that are consistent with their religious beliefs or that even support these beliefs. Religious organisations have pioneered responsible investment. Yet little is known about their investment attitudes. This article addresses this gap by studying faith consistent investing. Based on a survey complemented by interviews, we investigate religious organisations’ attitudes towards responsible investment including opinions, practices and the impediments for implementing faith consistent investing. Although our results cannot be generalised because of the non-random character of our sample, six main characteristics of faith consistent investing are drawn: investing is not perceived as being in contradiction with religious values, religious values are important drivers, there is a strong community around faith consistent investing, religious investors are pioneering impact investing, implementing faith consistent investing is not without difficulties, and practices vary across regions. The survey also reveals that faith consistent investing has many commonalities with secular responsible investors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to His Excellence Mr Ban Ki-moon, United Nations Secretary General, speech at the Celebration of Faiths and the Environment in Windsor in November 2009.

  2. For more information see the Church of England’s website, www.cofe.anglican.org/info/ethical, accessed on February 26, 2011.

  3. For more information see OMI Justice and Peace/Integrity of Creation Office’s website, www.omiusajpic.org, accessed on February 26, 2011.

  4. For more information see Union for Reform Judaism’s website, www.urj.org, accessed on February 26, 2011.

  5. For more information see The Central Finance Board of the Methodist Church’s website, www.cfbmethodistchurch.org.uk, Accessed on February 19, 2011.

  6. For more information see the The General Board of Pension and Health Benefits’ website, www.gbophb.org, Accessed on February 19, 2011.

  7. For more information see www.jesuit.org, Accessed on February 19, 2011.

  8. For those interested in an extensive annotated bibliography of academic studies on this topic, see the website maintained by the Center for Responsible Business, sristudies.org (www.sristudies.org).

References

  • 3iG. (2010a). To contribute to a just and sustainable society through responsible investment in a spirit of genuine interfaith dialogue and co-operation. International Interface Investment Group (3iG). Retrieved August 11, 2011 from http://www.3ignet.org/resourcecenter/documents/3iGleafletelectronicversion.pdf.

  • 3iG. (2010b). Faith institutions and impact investing: An introduction. International Interfaith Investment Group (3iG). Retrieved April 5, 2011 from http://www.3ignet.org/resourcecenter/resourcePDFs/3iG_impact_investing_April_2010.pdf.

  • Acquier, A., Gond, J.-P., & Igalens, J. (2005). Des fondements religieux de la responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise à la responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise comme religion. Cahiers du Centre de Recherche en Gestion, Université de Toulouse, No. 166.

  • Al-Amine, M., & Al-Bashir, M. (2001). The Islamic bonds market: Possibilities and challenges. International Journal of Islamic Financial Services, 3(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaeshi, K. (2010). Different markets for different folks: Exploring the challenges of mainstreaming responsible investment practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaeshi, K., & Grayson, D. (2006). The challenges of mainstreaming environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues in investment decisions: A mini-survey of practitioners’ reports. Working paper, Cranfield School of Management, SDA Bocconi and Vlerick Leuven Gent Business School.

  • Amenc, N., & Le Sourd, V. (2010). The performance of socially responsible investment and sustainable development in France: An update after the financial crisis. EDHEC-Risk September. Retrieved October 29, 2010 from <http://docs.edhec-risk.com/mrk/000000/Press/EDHEC-Risk_Position_Paper_SRI.pdf>.

  • Anand, P., & Cowton, C. J. (1993). The ethical investor: Exploring dimensions of investment behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14, 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, S., & Karim, R. A. (2002). Islamic finance. Innovation and growth. London: Euromoney and AAOIFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arjaliès, D. (2010). A social movement perspective on finance: How socially responsible investment mattered. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 57–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1101–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1751–1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R., Guenster, N., Derwall, J., & Koedijk, K. (2006a). The economic value of corporate eco-efficiency. Retrieved October 29, 2010 from <http://ssrn.com/abstract=675628>.

  • Bauer, R., Otten, R., & Tourani Rad, A. (2006b). Ethical investing in Australia: Is there a financial penalty? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 14(1), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R., Derwall, J., & Otten, R. (2007). The ethical mutual fund performance debate: New evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedict XIV. (1745). Vix Pervenit: On usury and other dishonest profit. Retrieved August 9, 2011 from http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Ben14/b14vixpe.htm.

  • Benson, K., Brailsford, T., & Humphrey, J. (2006). Do socially responsible fund managers really invest differently? Journal of Business Ethics, 65(4), 337–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, S. J., & Krueger, B. S. (2004). Internet data collection. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, P. (1993). Accounting in churches: A research framework and agenda, accounting. Auditing & Accountability Journal, 6(4), 37–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., Williams, G., & Zinkin, J. (2007). Religion and attitudes to corporate social responsibility in a large cross-country sample. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1191–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bugg-Levine, A., & Goldstein, J. (2009). Impact investing: Harnessing capital markets to solve problems at scale, community development investment review, San Francisco, CA. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 5(2), 30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camejo, P. (2002). The SRI advantage: Why socially responsible investing has outperformed financially. Gabriealla Island, British Columbia: New Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catechism of the Catholic Church. (1993). Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Citta del Vaticano. Retrieved August 02, 2011 from http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM.

  • Clark, G. L., & Hebb, T. (2004). Pension fund corporate engagement. Industrial Relations, 59(1), 142–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. L., Salo, J., & Hebb, T. (2008). Social and environmental shareholder activism in the public spotlight: US corporate annual meetings, campaign strategies, and environmental performance, 2001–04. Environment and Planning, 40(6), 1370–1390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (2010). Israel and the Holy See negotiate: A case study in diplomacy across religions. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 5(3), 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compendium of the Catechism of the Catholic Church. (2005). Libreria Editrice Vatican. Retrieved August 02, 2011 from http://www.vatican.va/archive/compendium_ccc/documents/archive_2005_compendium-ccc_en.html.

  • Cordes, R. (2010). Impact investing. Financial Planning, 40(5), 45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowton, C. (1994). The development of ethical investment products. In A. R. Prindl & B. Prodhan (Eds.), Ethical conflicts in finance (pp. 213–232). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowton, C. (1998). Socially responsible investment. In R. Chadwick (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of applied ethics. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crites, S. L., Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Measuring the affective and cognitive properties of attitudes: Conceptual and methodological issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(6), 619–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Déjean, F., Gond, J.-P., & Leca, B. (2004). Measuring the unmeasured: An institutional entrepreneur’s strategy in an emerging industry. Human Relations, 57(6), 741–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delorenzo, T. Y. (2002). The religious foundations of Islamic finance. In S. Archer & R. A. Karim (Eds.), Islamic finance, innovation and growth. London: Euromoney and AAOIFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005). The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diltz, J. D. (1995) Does social screening affect portfolio performance? Journal of Investing, Spring, 64–69.

  • Domini, A. L. (2001). Socially responsible investing: Making a difference in making money. Chicago: Dearborn Trade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J. B., Flesher, D. L., & Stocks, M. H. (1999). Internal control systems in US churches: An examination of the effects of church size and denomination on systems of internal control, accounting. Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(2), 142–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (2003). Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse (5th ed.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmans, A. (2010). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Retrieved October 29, 2010 from <http://ssrn.com/abstract=985735>.

  • Eurosif. (2008). European SRI study. Retrieved October 29, 2010 from http://www.eurosif.org/publications/sri_studies.

  • Eurosif. (2010a). European SRI study 2010. Paris: Eurosif. Retrieved October 15, 2010 from www.eurosif.org/research/eurosif-sri-study/european-sri-study-2010 <http://www.eurosif.org/research/eurosif-sri-study/european-sri-study-2010.

  • Eurosif. (2010b). European SRI study 2010. Paris: Eurosif. Retrieved October 15, 2010 from www.eurosif.org/research/eurosif-sri-study/european-sri-study-2010 <http://www.eurosif.org/research/eurosif-sri-study/european-sri-study-2010.

  • Fehrenbacher, S. (2001). Put your money where your morals are. A guide to values-based investing. Nashville: Broadman & Holman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, S. P. (2010). Faith and finance: A catholic consideration. Ninth Harvard University Forum on Islamic Finance (March 27).

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte, G. M., & Miglietta, F. (2007). Islamic mutual funds as faith-based funds in a socially responsible context. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved August 11, 2011 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1012813.

  • Ghoul, W., & Karam, P. (2007). MRI and SRI mutual funds: A comparison of Christian, Islamic (morally responsible investing), and socially responsible investing (SRI) mutual funds. Journal of Investing, 16(2), 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girard, E., & Hassan, M. K. (2008). Is there a cost to faith-based investing: Evidence from FTSE Islamic indices. Journal of Investing, 17(4), 112–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glac, K. (2008). Explaining socially responsible investing: A framing perspective of the investment decision process. Minnesota: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glac, K. (2009). Understanding socially responsible investing: The effect of decision frames and trade-off options. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(Supplement 1), 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon Pole, D. (2005). Liability of religious charities: A new frontier: Accountability of religious persons and institutions in Tort. The Philanthropist, 20(2), 87–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graaf, D., Jan, F., & Slager, A. (2009). Guidelines for integrating socially responsible investment in the investment process. Journal of Investing, 18(3), 70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, S. B., Rehbein, K., & Waddock, S. (2001). Fad and fashion in shareholder activism: The landscape of shareholder resolutions 1988–1998. Business and Society Review, 106(4), 293–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. F. (1953). Attitude measurement. In L. Gardner (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology, Vol. 1. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. pp. 335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyatt, D. J. (2005). Finance and accounting: Meeting objectives and resisting conventions. A focus on institutional investors and long-term responsible investing. Journal of Corporate Governance, 5(3), 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyatt, D. J. (2006). Identifying and overcoming behavioural impediments to long term responsible investments—A focus on UK institutional investors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Bath.

  • Hoffman, A. (1996). A strategic response to investor activism. Sloan Management Review, 37(2), 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, M., Nofsinger, J., & Varma, A. (2009). Sin stocks and the religious investor. Working paper, Washington State University.

  • Hui, L. T. (2008). Combining faith and CSR: A paradigm of corporate sustainability. International Journal of Social Economics, 35(6), 449–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juravle, C., & Lewis, A. (2008). Identifying impediments to SRI in Europe: A review of the practitioner and academic literature. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(3), 285–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, C., & Siegrist, M. (2006). Money attitude typology and stock investment. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 7(2), 88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettell, B. (2008). Introduction to Islamic banking and finance. London: Islamic Banking Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, P. D., & Domini, A. L. (1997). Social screening: Paradigms old and new. The Journal of Investing, Winter, pp. 12–19.

  • Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 24(5), 583–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreander, N., McPhail, K., & Molyneaux, D. (2004). God’s fund managers: A critical study of stock market investment practices of the Church of England and UK Methodists’ accounting. Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(3), 408–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreander, N., Gray, R. H., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D. (2005). Evaluating the performance of ethical and non-ethical funds: A matched pair analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(7/8), 1465–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. (2001). A focus group study of the motivation to invest: ‘Ethical/green’ and ‘ordinary’ investors compared. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(4), 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A., & Mackenzie, C. (2000). Morals, money, ethical investing and economic psychology. Human Relations, 53(2), 179–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louche, C. (2004). Ethical investment: Processes and mechanisms of institutionalisation in the Netherlands, 1990–2002. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Rotterdam.

  • Louche, C., & Lydenberg, S. (2006). Socially responsible investment: Difference between Europe and United States. Working Papers, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, series 2006-22.

  • Louche, C., & Lydenberg, S. (2010). Responsible investment. In J. R. Boatright (Ed.), Finance ethics: Critical issues in financial theory and practice (pp. 393–418). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louche, C., & Lydenberg, S. (2011). Dilemmas in responsible investment. London: Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C. (1997). Ethical investment and the challenge of corporate reform—A critical assessment of the procedures and purposes of UK ethical unit trusts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Bath.

  • Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meir, A. (2009). Jewish values based investment guide for charities and communal organizations. Business Ethics Center of Jerusalem Publication. Retrieved August 11, 2011 from http://www.3ignet.org/resourcecenter/documents/JewishCommunalInvestmentGuidelinesNov4th2009.pdf.

  • Naughton, S., & Naughton, T. (2000). Religion, ethics and stock trading: The case of an Islamic equities market. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(2), 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, J., Nordvall, A.-C., & Isberg, S. (2010). The information search process of socially responsible investors. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 15(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donohoe, N., Leijonhufvud, C., & Saltuk, Y. (2010). Impact investments: An emerging asset class. J.P. Morgan. November 19.

  • Opplysningsvesenets Fond (2003). Guidelines for opplysningsvesenets fond’s socially responsible investments. Retrieved August 02, 2011 from http://www.3ignet.org/resourcecenter/resourcePDFs/OVF_EthicalGuidelines_hefte.pdf.

  • Ostrom, T. M. (1969). The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 12–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy, B., Yeung, M., & Au, A. (2010). Consumer support for corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of religion and values. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renneboog, L., ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behaviour. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1723–1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (2010). Information asymmetry and socially responsible investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 145–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2008). Do employees care about CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. A. (2005). Socially responsible investment in UK faith-based charities—Investigating the impact of religious values on investment strategy. Unpublished MSc Dissertation, Centre for Charity Effectiveness, Cass Business School, City University.

  • Rossetti, A. (2005). Highlights of Catholic Social Doctrine in relation to faith consistent investing (FCI), Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Vatican City. Retrieved August 02, 2011 from http://www.3ignet.org/pdfs/ROSSETTI.pdf.

  • Rowley, T. I., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, A. (1981). Social responsibility and portfolio performance. California Management Review, 23(4), 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J., Juravle, C., Hedesström, T., & Hamilton, I. (2009). The heterogeneity of socially responsible investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(4), 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, H. (2004). Ethical investment of German non-profit organizations—conceptual outline and empirical results. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(4), 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S. (2003). The ‘ethics’ of ethical investing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S., Tamari, M., & Schwab, D. (2007). Ethical investing from a Jewish perspective. Business & Society Review, 12(1), 137–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöström, E. (2010). Shareholders as norm entrepreneurs for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, R. (1995). The ethical investor. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, R. (2001). Ethical investment: Whose ethics, which investment? Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(3), 194–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, R., & Cowton, C. J. (2004). The maturing of socially responsible investment: A review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SRI Compass. (2003). Screening policies for SRI funds. Avanzi SRI Research/SiRi Group.

  • Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1987). A theory of religion. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statman, M. (2000). Socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(3), 30–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statman, M. (2005). The religions of social responsibility. Journal of Investing, 14, 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economic Community. (2008). The United Methodist Publishing House. Retrieved August 02, 2011 from http://www.umc-gbcs.org/site/c.frLJK2PKLqF/b.3713153/k.FC2F/182163_IV_The_Economic_Community/apps/nl/newsletter.asp.

  • US SIF. (1999). 1999 Trends report: Report on responsible investing trends in the US. Social Investment Forum US.

  • US SIF. (2001). 2001 Report on socially responsible investing—Trend in the United States. Social Investment Forum US.

  • US SIF. (2010) 2010 Report on socially responsible investing trends in the United States. Washington, DC: US Social Investment Forum. Retrieved November 16, 2010 from http://www.socialinvest.org/resources/pubs/trends/documents/2010TrendsES.pdf <http://www.socialinvest.org/resources/research/>.

  • Valor, C., & de la Cuesta, M. (2007). An empirical analysis of the demand of Spanish religious groups and charities for socially responsible investments. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(2), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buren, H. J. (2007). Speaking truth to power: Religious institutions as both dissident organizational stakeholders and organizational partners. Business & Society Review, 112(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Cranenburgh, K. C. (2010). Faith institutions and impact investing: An introduction. International Interfaith Investment Group.

  • Williams, G., & Zinkin, J. (2010). Islam and CSR: A study of the compatibility between the tenets of Islam and the UN global compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(4), 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the International Interfaith Investment Group (3iG) for making this research possible. They have helped us both in terms of financial resources, networks and content. We would also like to thank the Interfaith Center for Corporate Responsibility, the Ecumenical Council on Corporate Responsibility, Oikocredit and SHARE for providing access to their networks.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vlerick Leuven Gent Management SchoolReep 1, 9000, Gent, Belgium

    Céline Louche

  2. ESADE, Ramon Llull University Av Pedralbes, 60-62, 08034, Barcelona, Spain

    Daniel Arenas & Katinka C. van Cranenburgh

Authors
  1. Céline Louche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Arenas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katinka C. van Cranenburgh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Arenas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Louche, C., Arenas, D. & van Cranenburgh, K.C. From Preaching to Investing: Attitudes of Religious Organisations Towards Responsible Investment. J Bus Ethics 110, 301–320 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1155-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1155-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation