Abstract
On December 9, 1999, VA Linux issued shares to the public and left over $900 million on the table for investors. In the prospectus, the investment banker Credit Suisse First Boston (CSFB) stated it would receive a 7% gross spread as its compensation for underwriting the shares. Yet the SEC alleges some investors paid enormous commissions to CSFB in the form of a kick-back immediately after obtaining the IPO shares. Hence, CSFB had an economic interest in the IPO and there was not a full distribution of shares. This apparent violation of NASD Rule 2110 raises questions as to the credibility of the financial markets.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arosio, R., G. Giudici and S. Paleari: 2001, ‘Why Do (or Did?) Internet-stock IPOs Leave So Much Money on the Table?’, Unpublished Politecnico di Milano (Italy) Paper.
H.C. Chen J. Ritter (2000) ArticleTitleThe Seven Percent Solution Journal of Finance 55 1105–1131 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0022-1082.00242
M. Cliff D.J. Denis (2004) ArticleTitleDo IPO Firms Purchase Analyst Coverage with Underpricing? Journal of Finance 59 2871–2901 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00719.x
T. Loughran J. Ritter (2004) ArticleTitleWhy has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time? Financial Management 33 5–37
P. Schultz M. Zaman (2001) ArticleTitleDo the Individuals Closest to Internet Firms Believe They Are Overvalued? Journal of Financial Economics 59 347–381 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00090-8
Securities and Exchange Commission: 2002, ‘SEC Sues CSFB for IPO Violations; CSFB Will Pay $100 Million’, Litigation release 17327 available at http://www.sec.gov/litigation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loughran, T. NASD Rule 2110 and the VA Linux IPO. J Bus Ethics 62, 141–146 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0179-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0179-3