Psycholinguistic Aspects of Youth Speech. Consequences and Realities of Postmodernism in Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.3/485Keywords:
Modification of concepts, speech metamorphoses, “linguistic postmodernism”, speech performance, “linguistic turn”Abstract
The article describes the postmodern features of Ukrainian language education and psycholinguistic term system, which is important for understanding the direction of optimizing the language situation among young people. Then, after careful selection and multimodal analysis, the authors cite about 30 key features of youth speech in the late postmodern era. The urgency of the topic is determined by postmodernist trends that are still observed in Ukraine, as well as their specific impact on youth speech. The authors used a body of fragments of living youth discourse 2018 - 2020, as well as relevant methods of analysis: psycholinguistic, semantic, culturological, pragmatic (establishing practical motives for the use of language units); the method of establishing correlations between cultural, social and speech phenomena, as well as the method of generalization. The authors came to an important generalization: contemporary youth uses their speech in such a way that it can be decoded differently only in the current discourse - among other carriers of postmodern linguistic consciousness. And this is also a manifestation of the general game, performance and even the way of existence of the individual in a real or hyperreal society that is constantly communicating.
References
Berezin, F., & Golovin, B. (1979). Obshcheye yazykoznaniye: Uchebnoe posobiye dlia studentov pedinstitutov [General linguistics: a textbook for students of pedagogical institutes]. Mоscow.: Prosveshcheniye. https://www.twirpx.com/file/1185543/
Bilokonna, N. (1997). Linhvistychni slovnyky yak zasib intelektualnoho rozvytku molodshykh shkoliariv [Linguistic dictionaries as a means of intellectual development of junior schoolchildren]. Pedahohika i psykholohiia [Pedagogy and psychology], 4, 88 - 94.
Burbules, N. C. (2009). Postmodernism and education. In H. Siegel (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of education (pp. 524-535). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195312881.003.0029
Curry, M. R. (1991). Postmodernism, language, and the strains of modernism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81(2), 210-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1991.tb01687.x
Eiger, G. V., & Rapoport, I. A. (1991). Yazyik i lichnost [Language and personality]. Kharkiv: Publishing House of Kharkiv State University named after A. M. Gorky.
Fahim, M., & Pishghadam, R. (2011). Postmodernism and English language teaching. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 1(2), 27-54. 20.1001.1.20085494.2009.1.2.2.8
Gauger, A. M. (1978). Sprachbewusstsein und Sprachwissencarft [Language awareness and linguistics]. München: Serie Piper.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books. https://asantelim.files.wordpress.com/2018/05/daniel-goleman-emotional-intelligence.pdf
Green, A. (1997). Education, globalization and the nation state. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/ 10.1057/9780230371132
Honcharuk, V., Rozhi, I., Dutchak, O., Poplavskiy, M., Rybinska, Y., & Horbatiuk, N. (2021). Training of Future Geography Teachers to Local Lore and Tourist Work on the Basis of Competence. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidemensionala, 13(3), 429-447. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.3/460
Kantharaj, K. S., & Dr.V.Manimozhi (2021). English language teaching in postmodern era. SPAST Abstracts, 1(01), Article 3. https://spast.org/techrep/article/view/3475
Lecercle, J. J. (1990). Postmodernism and Language. In R. Boyne, A.Rattansi (Eds), Postmodernism and Society. Communications and Culture. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20843-2_3
Leontiev, A. (1973). Predvaritelnyie materialy eksperimentalnykh issledovaniy po psikholingvistike [Preliminary materials of experimental research in psycholinguistics]. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics.
Lyotard, J.-F. (2018). La condition postmoderne: rapport sur le savoir [The Postmodern Condition: Knowledge Report]. Minuit. https://excerpts.numilog.com/books/9782707302762.pdf
Monakhova, T. V. (2015). Narodnytstvo, modernizm i postmodernizm u linhvistytsi [Populism, modernism and postmodernism in linguistics]. Mykolayiv: BSTU Publishing House. https://goo.su/awtt
Nerubasska, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The demarkation of creativity, talent and genius in humans: a systemic aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/172
Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A Systemic Philosophical Analysis of the Contemporary Society and the Human: New Potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235
Olyinik, I. S., Ivanenko, V.K., Rozhilo, P. P., & Skorik, O. S. (1989). Metodyka vykladannia ukrainskoi movy v serednii shkoli [Methodology of teaching of the Ukrainian language in the middle school]. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola. https://www.twirpx.com/file/1082955/
Onishchuk, I., Ikonnikova, M., Antonenko, T., Kharchenko, I., Shestakova, S., Kuzmenko, N., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). Characteristics of Foreign Language Education in Foreign Countries and Ways of Applying Foreign Experience in Pedagogical Universities of Ukraine. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 44-65. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/308
Povidaichyk, O., Pedorenko, V., Popova, A., Turgenieva, A., Rybinska, Y., & Demchenko, I. (2021). Research Paradigm as a Value Guideline for Professional Training of Future Social Workers. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(3), 530-547. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.3/465
Roberts, M. (2004). Postmodernism and the linguistic turn. In M. Roberts (Ed.), Making History: An Introduction to the History and Practices of a Discipline, (pp. 227-240). London and New York: Routledge.
Saussure, F. de. (2001). Zametki po obschey lingvistike [Notes on General Linguistics]. Moscow: Progress. https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/filosofija_jazyka/sossjur_f_de_zametki_po_obshhej_lingvistike/32-1-0-2544
Steinthal, H. (1855). Grammatik, Logik und Psychologie, ihre Prinzipien und ihr Verhaeltnis zueinander [Grammar, logic and psychology, their principles and their relation to each other]. Berlin: Ferd. Dümmlers Verlagsbuchhandlung. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2388710_3/component/file_2455046/content
Suleyeva, K., Tovma, N., & Zakirova, O. (2021). Developing emotional intelligence in elementary school children in Russia: verbal and non-verbal communication. Education, 3-13, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1934060
Tokareva, N. (2018). Partialization of adolescent speech in the conditions of fniomatic society [Partsializatsiia movlennia pidlitkiv v umovakh fniormatsiinoho suspilstva]. In L. O. Kalmykova (Ed.), Psykholinhvistyka v suchasnomu sviti [Psycholinguistics in a modern world], (pp. 38 – 40). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1622295
Vdovychyn, I., & Savoyska, S. (2019). Vplyv postmodernizmu na rozbudovu modeli movnoi polityky [The influence of postmodernism on the development of the language policy model]. Visnyk Donetskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Vasylia Stusa. Seriia politychni nauky [Bulletin of Vasyl Stus Donetsk National University. Political Science Series], (4), 79-85. https://doi.org/10.31558/2617-0248.2019.4.13
Vygotsky, L. (1996). Myshleniye i rech. Psykholohicheskiye issledovaniya [Thinking and speaking. Psychological research]. Moscow: Labyrint. https://www.twirpx.com/file/2761260/
Wundt, B. M. (2007). Vvedenie v psihologiyu [Introduction to psychology]. Moscow: KomKniga. http://padaread.com/?book=32751&pg=2
Zimnyaya, I. (1989). Psikholohiya obucheniya nerodnomu yazyku [Psychology of teaching a foreign language]. Moscow: Russkiy yazyk. https://www.twirpx.com/file/1480958/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
