Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Ethical Contract as a Tool in Organic Animal Husbandry

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores what an ethicfor organic animal husbandry might look like,departing from the assumption that organicfarming is substantially based in ecocentricethics. We argue that farm animals arenecessary functional partners in sustainableagroecosystems. This opens up additional waysto argue for their moral standing. We suggestan ethical contract to be used as acomplementary to the ecocentric framework. Weexpound the content of the contract and end bysuggesting how to apply this contract inpractice. The contract enjoins us to share thewealth created in the agroecosystem (by ourjoint contributions) by enjoining us to carefor the welfare and needs of the individualanimal, and to protect them from exploitation(just as human co-workers should not beexploited). The contract makes promoting goodanimal welfare a necessary condition forbenefiting farm animals. Animals for their partare guaranteed coverage under the contract solong as they continue to contribute to thesystem with products and services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alrèe, H. F., M. Vaarst, and E. S. Kristensen, “Does Organic Farming Face Distinctive Livestock Welfare Issues?-A Conceptual Analysis,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2001), 275-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A., “How Can We Best Use Biodiversity in Agroecosystems,” Outlook on Agriculture 20 (1991), 15-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A., Crop Protection Strategies for Subsistence Farmers (Westview Press, Boulder, CO; IT Publictions, London, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A., Biodiversity and Pest Management in Agroecosystems (Food Products Press, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A., Agroecology: The Science of Sustainable Agriculture (Westview Press, Boulder, CO; IT Publications, London, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A., “Agroecology: Principles and Strategies for Designing Sustainable Farming Systems,” in N. Uphoff (ed.), Agroecological Innovations (Earthscan Pub., London, 2002), pp. 40-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., “Man as Maker of New Plants and Plant Communities,” in W. A. Thomas Jr (ed.), Man's Role in Changing the Face of the Earth (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1956), pp. 363-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, N., The Foraging Pig-Resource Utilisation, Interaction, Performance and Behaviour of Pigs in Cropping Systems. PhD dissertation, Agraria 227, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae, 2000.

  • Anon., Udtalelse om èkologisk husdyrproduktion [Statement Regarding Organic Livestock Production] (Det dyreetiske råd, Justitsministeriet, Copenhagen, 1995).

  • Anon., “Council Regulation (EC) No 1804/1999 of 19 July 1999 supplementing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs to include livestock production,” Official Journal L 222, 24/08/1999 (1999), pp. 0001-0028.

  • Anthony, R., Animals and TheirMoral Standing: A Philosophical Examination of the Relationship Between Animal Cognition and Human Obligation. PhD dissertation, Purdue University, 2003.

  • Benfalk, C., M. Edström, Q. Geng, F. Gunnarsson, K. Lindgren, and Å. Nordberg, Mobila slakterier för nötkreatur och svin [Mobile Slaughter Houses for Cattle and Pigs], JTI-rapport Lantbruk & Industri 300 (The Swedish Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Uppsala, Sweden, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehncke, E., “Preventive Strategies as a Health Resource for Organic Farming,” in J. Isart and J. J. Llerena (eds), Resource Use in Organic Farming. Proceedings of the 3rd ENOF Workshop, Ancona, Italy, June 5-6 (1997), pp. 25-35.

  • Boucher, D. H., S. James, and K. Kesler, “The Ecology of Mutualism,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13 (1982), 31-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budiansky, S., The Covenant of the Wild. Why Animals Chose Domestication (W. Morrow, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Budiansky, S., “A Special Relationship: The Coevolution of Human Beings and Domesticated Animals,” JAVMA 204(3) (1994), 365-368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess-Jackson, K., “Doing Right by our Animal Companions,” Journal of Ethics 2 (1998), 159-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bökönyi, S., “Definitions of Animal Domestication,” in J. Clutton-Brock (ed.), The Walking Larder, Patterns of Domestication, Pastoralism and Predation (Unwin Hyman, London/Boston, 1989), pp. 22-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J. B., “Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair,” Environmental Ethics 2 (1980), 311-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J. B., “Animal Liberation and Environmental Ethics: Back Together Again,” in In Defense of the Land Ethic (State University of New York Press, Albany, 1989), pp. 49-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M., “Beyond the Terms of the Contract: Mothers and Farmers,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 7(2) (1994), 205-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, J. M. and M. A. Leibold, “Spatial Scale Dictates the Productivity-Diodiversity Relationship,” Nature 416 (2002), 427-429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, P., The Animals Issue (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, J., Domesticated Animals from Early Times (Heineman & BritishMuseum, Natural History, London, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, J., “Introduction to Domestication,” in J. Clutton-Brock (ed.), The Walking Larder, Patterns of Domestication, Pastoralism and Predation (Unwin Hyman, London/Boston, 1989), pp. 7-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • DARCOF, Principles of Organic Farming. Discussion Document prepared for the DARCOF Users Committee (Danish Research Centre for Organic Farming, Foulum, Denmark, 2000). [Available on-line at http://www.darcof.dk (Accessed on July 15, 2003).] Dickman, C., “Commensal and Mutualistic Interactions Among Terrestrial Vertebrates,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7(6) (1992), 194-197.

  • Ekesbo, I., “Animal Health Implications as a Result of Future Livestock and Husbandry Developments,” in Int. Symposium on Bioethics and applied Ethology, Montreal, Canada (1987).

  • Ekesbo, I. and V. Lund, Svensk djurskyddslagstiftning i EG-perspektiv. Djurhälsomässiga och ekonomiska konsekvenser av svensk djurskyddslagstiftning i förhållande till EGområdets [Swedish Animal Welfare Legislation in a European Union Perspective. Consequences of the Swedish Welfare Legislation for animal health and Production Economy]. Attachment to Swedish Board of Agriculture Report (1993), p. 21.

  • Ekesbo, I. and V. Lund, “Different Standards in AnimalWelfare Legislation: Consequences for Animal Health and Production Economy,” in S. Diesch (ed.), Proceedings, 8th Congress of International Society of Animal Hygiene, St. Paul, MN, USA, PA1-PA5. International Society for Animal Hygiene (1994).

  • Fraser, D., D. M. Weary, E. A. Pajor, and B. N. Milligan, “A Scientific Conception of Animal Welfare that Reflects Ethical Concerns,” Animal Welfare 6 (1997), 187-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D., “Animal Ethics and Animal Welfare Science: Bridging the Two Cultures,” Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65 (1999), 171-189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman, S. R., Agroecology: Ecological Processes in Sustainable Agriculture (Ann Arbor Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove, E. C. (ed.), The Animal Rights/Environmental Ethics Debate (State University of New York Press, Albany, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastorf, C. A., “The Cultural Life of Early Domestic Plant Use,” Antiquity 72(278) (1998), 773-782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemsworth, P. H. and G. J. Coleman, Human-Livestock Interactions. The Stockperson and the Productivity and Welfare of Intensively Farmed Animals (CAB International, Bristol, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T., De Cive, the English Version. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1983). First published (in Latin) in 1642.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFOAM, IFOAM Basic Standards (International Federation of Organic Movements, Tholey-Theley, Germany, 2000). (Also published at: www.ifoam.org/standard/basics.htm)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Trade Centre, statistics published at: http://www.intracen.org/mds/sectors/ organic/overview.pdf (2002).

  • Ivarsson, J., A. Gunnarsson, E. Hansson, H. Fogelfors, Ö. Folkesson, A. Lundkvist, and I.-L. Andersson, Försök med ekologiska och konventionella odlingsformer [Field Trials with Organic and Conventional Cropping Methods] 1987-1998, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Meddelande från Södra jordbruksförsöks-distriktet 53/2001 (SLU, Alnarp, 2001).

  • Jarman, M. R., G. M. Baily, and H. N. Jarman, Early European Agriculture (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982), pp. 58-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrère, C. and R. Larrère, “Animal Rearing as a Contract?” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2000), 51-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A., A Sand County Almanac (Oxford University Press, London, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Loreau, M., S. Naeem, P. Inchausti, J. Bengtsson, J. P. Grime, A. Hector, D. U. Hooper, M. A. Huston, D. Raffaelli, B. Schmid, D. Tilman, and D. A. Wardle, “Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges,” Science 294(26) (October 2001), 804-808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, V., “Ekologisk djurhållning [Organic Animal Husbandry],” in A. Gransted, H. Bovin, K.-Å. Brorsson, V. Lund, and Å. Rölin (eds.), Ekologiskt lantbruk-fördjupning [Organic Farming-Advanced Studies] (Natur och kultur/LT, Stockholm, 1998), pp. 97-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, V., Ethics and Animal Welfare-an Interdisciplinary Approach, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae, Veterinaria 137, PhD dissertation (2002).

  • Lund, V. and H. Röcklinsberg, “Outlining a Conception of Animal Welfare for Organic Farming Systems,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14(4) (2001), 391-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, V., S. Hemlin, and W. Lockeretz, “Organic Livestock Production as Viewed by Swedish Farmers and Organic Initiators,” Agriculture and Human Values 19(3) (2002), 255-268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, V., S. Hemlin, and J. White, “Ethics and Natural Behavior-Swedish Organic Farmers' View on Animal Issues,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, accepted for publication.

  • Lindholm, S., Helhet och mångfald. Det ekologiska lantbrukets bärande idéer i relation till miljöetisk teori [Entirety and Manifoldness. The Basic Ideas of Organic Farming in Relation to Environmental Ethics], Acta Universitetis Agriculturae Sueciae, Agraria 272. PhD dissertation, Uppsala, Sweden (2001).

  • Mannion, A. M., “Domestication and the Origins of Agriculture: An Appraisal,” Progress in Physical Geography 23(1) (1999), 37-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Abich, K. M., Praktische Naturphilosophie. Erinnerungen an einen vergessenen Traum (C. H. Beck, München, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadow, R. H., “Osteological Evidence for the Process of Animal Domestication,” in J. Clutton-Brock (ed.), The Walking Larder, Patterns of Domestication, Pastoralism and Predation (Unwin Hyman, London/Boston, 1989), pp. 81-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M., Animals and Why TheyMatter (University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. J., M. H. D. Mauld, M. G. Le Duc, and R. H. Marrs, “Ecosystem Stability and Resilience: A Review of Their Relevance for the Conservation Management of Lowland Heaths,” Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 3(2) (2000), 142-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAHWOA, 2002. Final Recommendations and Comments. Report to the European Union. Network for Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Agriculture, Final report from FAIR CT 4405. To be found at: http://www.veeru.reading.ac.uk/organic/NAHWOAConclusionsFinal. pdf

  • Naeem, S. and L. Shibin, “Biodiversity Enhances Ecosystem Reliability,” Nature 390 (1997), 507-509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Næss, A., “Identification as a Source of Deep Ecological Attitudes,” in M. Tobias (ed.), Deep Ecology (Avanti Books, San Diego, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Næss, A., Ecology, Community and Lifestyle (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niggli, U. and W. Lockeretz, “Development of Research in Organic Agriculture,” in T. V. Østergaard, (ed.), Fundamentals of Organic Agriculture. Proceedings, Vol. 1, 11th IFOAM International Scientific Conference, 11-15 August, Copenhagen (1996), pp. 9-23.

  • Ninkovic, V., Plant Volatiles Mediate Tritrophic Interactions. Barley, Aphids and Ladybirds. PhD dissertation, Uppsala (2002).

  • Pimentel, D., “Agriculture and Ecotechnology,” in W. J. Mitsch and S. E. Jèrgensen (eds.), Ecological Engineering: An Introduction to Ecotechnology (Wiley, New York, 1989), pp. 103-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T., A Case for Animal Rights (University of California Press, Los Angeles, Berkeley, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindos, D., “Symbiosis, Instability and the Origins and Spread of Agriculture: A New Model,” Current Anthropology 21(6) (1980), 751-772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B., Farm Animal Welfare (Iowa State University Press, Ames, IO, 1995), pp. 3-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H. III., Environmental Ethics. Duties to and Values in the Natural World (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1988), 390 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutgers, B. and R. Heeger, “Inherent Worth and Respect for Animal Integrity,” in M. Dol, M. Fentener van Vlissingen, S. Kasanmoentalib, T. Visser, and H. Zwart (eds.), Recognizing the Intrinsic Value of Animals (Van Gorcum, Aassen, 1995), pp. 41-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röcklinsberg, H., Das seufzende Schwein. Zur Theorie und Praxis in Deutschen Modellen zur Tierethik. PhD dissertation, Harald Fischer Verlag, Erlangen (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagoff, M., “Animal Liberation and Environmental Ethics: Bad Marriage, Quick Divorce,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 22 (1984), 297-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlitt, M., Umweltethik. Philosophisch-ethische Reflexionen-Theologische Grundlagen-Kriterien (Ferdinand Schöning, Paderborn, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, O., “Comparison of EU Regulation 2092/91, Codex Alimentarius Guidelines for Organically Produced Food 1999/2001, and IFOAM Basic Standards 2000,” in G. Rundgren and W. Lockeretz (eds.), Reader, IFOAM Conference on Organic Guarantee Systems; International Harmonisation and Equivalence in Organic Agriculture, Nuremberg, Germany, 17-19 February. IFOAM, Tholey-Theley, Germany (2002), pp. 12-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabrook, M. F., “The psychological Interaction between the Stockman and His Animals and Its Influence on Performance of Pigs and Dairy Cows,” Veterinary Record 115 (1984), 84-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M., The Natural Contract (The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P., Animal Liberation (Avon Books, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P., Animal Liberation, 2nd edn. (Avon Books, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P., Practical Ethics, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorabji, R., Animal Minds and Human Morals (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soule, J. and J. K. Piper, Farming in Nature's Image. An Ecological Approach to Agriculture (Island Press, Washington DC/Covelo, California, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenmark, M., Environmental Ethics and Policy Making (Ashgate, Aldershot, Burlington, VT, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stricklin, R., “The Evolution and Domestication of Social Behavior,” in L. J. Keeling and H. W. Gonyou (eds.), Social Behavior in Farm Animals (Cabi Pub., London/New York, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. D., Should Trees have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects (W. Kaufmann, Los Altos, California, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Studnitz, M., Tryneringnings betydning for udegående poltes adfærd og velfærd [The Effect of Nose Ringing on Behaviour and Welfare in Sows]. PhD dissertation, Deptartment of Animal Health and Welfare, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. B., “Animals in the Agrarian Ideal,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6(Supplement) (1993), 36-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. B., Spirit of the Soil: Agriculture and Environmental Ethics (Routledge, London, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., “Biodiversity: Populations versus Ecosystem Stability,” Ecology 77(2) (1996), 350-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varner, G., “Pets, Companion Animals, and other Domestic Partners,” in E. Bernatar (ed.), Ethics for Everyday (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2002), pp. 450-475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, U., Das Tier in der Moral (Frankfurt am Main Klostermann, 1990).

  • Zeuner, F. E., A History of Domesticated Animals (Hutchkinson, London, 1963), pp. 36-64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 234, SE-532 23, Skara, Sweden

    Vonne Lund, Raymond Anthony & Helena Röcklinsberg

Authors
  1. Vonne Lund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raymond Anthony
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Helena Röcklinsberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lund, V., Anthony, R. & Röcklinsberg, H. The Ethical Contract as a Tool in Organic Animal Husbandry. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17, 23–49 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAGE.0000010843.60352.65

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAGE.0000010843.60352.65

Search

Navigation