Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Matters of Fact, and the Fact of Matter

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Barad is not the first to identify a phenomenological position with a feminist standpoint (see Smith 1992). Although she refers to the tendency to feminize “nature” as the passive object of science, she distinguishes her feminist view of “nature as agent” from any concrete identification of “nature” with the social category “woman” (Barad 2011: 445).

  2. My remarks here are based on having read the exchange between Pinch (2011) and Barad (2011). Unlike me, Trevor Pinch has some training in physics, and he also conducted an important sociological study of solar neutrino experiments (Pinch 1986).

References

  • Barad, K. (1999). Agential realism: Feminist interventions in understanding scientific practices. In M. Biagioli (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 1–11). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2011). Erasers and erasures: Pinch’s unfortunate ‘uncertainty principle’. Social Studies of Science, 41(3), 431–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B., Bloor, D., & Henry, J. (1996). Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert-Minor, C. (2014). Epistemological misgivings of Karen Barad’s ‘Posthumanism’. Human Studies. doi:10.1007/s10746-013-9285-x

  • Franklin, A. (1997). Millikan’s oil-drop experiments. The Chemical Educator, 2(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. (1978). Presuppositions, and the Millikan-Ehrenhaft dispute. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 9, 161–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T. (1986). Confronting nature: The sociology of solar neutrino detection. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T. (2011). Review essay: Karen Barad, quantum mechanics, and the paradox of mutual exclusivity. Social Studies of Science, 41(3), 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1954). Dilemmas: The Tanner Lectures 1953. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1992). Sociology from women’s experience: A reaffirmation. Sociological Theory, 10, 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

    Michael Lynch

Authors
  1. Michael Lynch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Lynch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lynch, M. Matters of Fact, and the Fact of Matter. Hum Stud 37, 139–145 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9297-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9297-6

Search

Navigation