Abstract
This essay evaluates Charles Taylor's defence of a politics of recognition in light of his broader account of modern identity and the self. I argue that his call for a politics of recognition betrays what is most ethically promising in his own account of modern subjectivity – namely, its emphasis on and affirmation of inner multiplicity. The first part of the paper identifies the ways in which his account of the self affirms inner multiplicity. The second part of the paper outlines how a politics of recognition circumscribes this inner plurality by rendering core aspects of personal identity rigid and by promoting attitudes that inhibit attentiveness to multiplicity within the self. By outlining the ways in which it circumscribes inner multiplicity, I show that Taylor's preferred form of politics undermines two of his own central goals: that of securing the conditions in which authentic identity can be realized and that of promoting mutually receptive relations among diverse selves. A form of liberalism that strives for neutrality with respect to cultural symbols and practices more effectively facilitates the realization of these goals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
1For helpful comments and discussions, I would like to thank Farid Abdel-Nour, Jonathan Allen, Mark Button, George Kateb, Jeff Spinner-Halev, Alan Ryan, Cindy Stark, and two anonymous reviewers.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lyshaug, B. Authenticity and the Politics of Identity: A Critique of Charles Taylor's Politics of Recognition. Contemp Polit Theory 3, 300–320 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300125
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300125