Skip to main content
Log in

Argumentation and interpretation in law

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Dworkin, R.: 1986,Law's Empire, Fontana Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Factortame: 1991,R v Secretary of State for Transport ex p. Factortame [1991] 3 All E.R. 769 (Court of Justice of the European Communities, case C-221/89).

  • Hinchy: 1959,Inland Revenue Commissioners v Hinchy [1959] 2 Q.B. 357 (Reversed, [1960] A.C. 748).

  • MacCormick, D. N. and R. S. Summers: 1991,Interpreting Statutes: a Comparative Study, Dartmouth Publishing Co., Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick, N.: 1984, ‘Coherence in Legal Justification’, in W. Krawietz et al. (eds.),Theorie der Normen: Festgabe für Ota Weinberger zum 65. Geburtsdag, Duncker und Humblot, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, R. S.: 1978, ‘Two Types of Substantive Reasons: The Core of a Theory of Common-Law Justification’,Cornell Law Review 63, 707–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tal, Y.: 1992,Statutory Interpretation and Expressed Reference to Justice: A Study of Cases in English Law and Implications for Interpretative Approach, D. Phil. Thesis, Oxford University, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wróblewski, J.: 1985, ‘Legal Language and Legal Interpretation’,Law and Philosophy 4, 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maccormick, N. Argumentation and interpretation in law. Argumentation 9, 467–480 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733152

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733152

Navigation