Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T03:38:52.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Problem about Identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2010

J. J. MacIntosh
J. J. MacIntosh
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The problem: Here are three plausible but incompatible propositions:

(1) The answer to Locke's question (23):

Could we suppose two distinct incommunicable consciousnesses acting the same body, the one constantly by day, the other by night … I ask … whether the day and the night man would not be two as distinct persons as Socrates and Plato ?

is yes.

(2) I am a human being. More generally, human persons are human beings.

(3) Identity is not relative.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 1974 , pp. 455 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS REFERRED TO

Bogen, J., ‘Identity and Origin’, Analysis, 26, 1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecht, B., ‘Poor B. B.’. Translation, Michael Hamburger.Google Scholar
Chandler, H. S., ‘Wiggins on Identity’, Analysis, 29, 1969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesterton, G. K., The Napoleon of Notting HillGoogle Scholar
Feldman, F., [1] ‘Geach and Relative Identity’, Review of Metaphysics, 22, 1968–9Google Scholar
Feldman, F., [2] ‘A Rejoinder’ (to Geach [3]), Review of Metaphysics, 22, 1968–9Google Scholar
Geach, P. T., [1] Reference and Generality. References are to sections.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T., [2] ‘Identity’, Review of Metaphysics, 21, 1967–8Google Scholar
Geach, P. T., [3] ‘A Reply’ (to Feldman [1]), Review of Metaphysics, 22, 1968–9Google Scholar
Geach, P. T., [4] ‘Immortality’, in P. T. Geach, God and the SoulGoogle Scholar
Geach, P. T., [5] ‘Ortological Relativity and Relative Identity’, in M. K. Munitz (ed.), Logic and Ontology.Google Scholar
Kripke, S., ‘Naming and Necessity’, in Davidson and Harman (edd.), Semantics of Natural LanguageGoogle Scholar
Locke, J., Essay Concerning Human Understanding. References are to sections of Book II, Chapter 27.Google Scholar
Perry, J., ‘The Same F’, Philosophical Review, 79, 1970Google Scholar
Plantinga, A., ‘World and Essence’, Philosophical Review, 79, 1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, A. N., ‘Identifiable Individuals’, Review of Metaphysics, 13, 1959–60Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S., [1] ‘Wiggins on Identity’, Philosophical Review, 79, 1970Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S., [2] Self-Knowledge and Self-IdentifyGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, D., [1] Identity and Spatio-Temporal ContinuityGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, D., [2] ‘Reply to Mr. Chandler’, Analysis, 29, 1969Google Scholar
Williams, B. A. O., ‘Personal Identity and Individuation’, in B.A.O. Williams, Problems of the SelfGoogle Scholar