Skip to main content
Log in

Not just what, but how: Creating agricultural sustainability and food security by changing Canada's agricultural policy making process

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agriculture has been enormously productive in recent decades. The main problem is that fragmentation of issues, knowledge, and responsibilities has hidden the costs associated with this success. These are mainly environmental, social, and health costs, which have been assigned to other ministries, with their own histories unconnected to agriculture. Now that agricultural policy has achieved its success, its costs are becoming apparent. The current system is preoccupied with traditional views of competitiveness and efficiency. Policies, programs, and regulations are organized to support specific commodities, not farming and food systems. Responsibilities are extremely fragmented and frequently uncoordinated. In this environment, the focus on nourishment, food security, and environmental sustainability is subordinated to economic issues.

The future lies in reorienting agricultural policy away from maximum production and towards sustainability. We propose a major transformation of the policy making apparatus in order to shift the focus of the system towards nourishment, food security, and sustainability. A new policy making system must be built on the themes of: integrated responsibilities and activities; emphasis on macro-policy; transdisciplinary policy development; proximity of policy makers to the diverse groups affected by problems needing resolution; food systems policy.

The design principles for such a new system are taken from the theory of food security and ecology. Using these principles, we design a new provincial department of food and food security, and test this design with two case studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agriculture and Agrifood Canada (1994). Future Directions for Agriculture and Agrifood: A Vision. Ottawa: Supply and Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albury, D. and J. Schwartz (1982). Partial Progress: The Politics of Science and Technology. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A. (1987). Agroecology: The Scientific Basis of Alternative Agriculture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (1996). “Consumers see nutrition information as unreliable,” Consumer Nutrition Institute August 23/96: 3.

  • Campbell, C., S. Katamay, and C. Connelly (1988). “The role of nutrition professionals in the hunger debate,” Journal of the Canadian Dietetic Association 49: 230–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, G. (1985). “Agroecosystem analysis,” Agricultural Administration 20: 31–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. E. and J. B. Cobb (1989). For the Common Good. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. and P. Russell (1989). The Creative Manager. London, UK: Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairburn, G. (1989). Will the Bounty End? Saskatoon: Western Producer Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, J. D. (1985). Institutions and Influence Groups in Canadian Farm and Food Policy. Monographs on Canadian Public Administration #6, Institute of Public Administration #10. Toronto: Institute of Public Administration of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giangrande, C. (1985). Down to Earth: The Crisis in Canadian Farming. Toronto: Anansi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. H. (1974). Food for Nought: The Decline in Nutrition. Hagerstown, MD: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson, J. et al. (1992). The Ethical Shopper's Guide to Canadian Supermarket Products. Peterborough: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. B. (1982). “A global food and agriculture policy for Western countries: Laying the foundation,” Nutrition and Health 1: 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. B. (1985). “Redesigning the food system for sustainability,” Alternatives 12(3/4): 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. B. (1988). “The healing and evolution of person and planet: Ecovalues, ecovision, ecoaction,” Presentation to 17th ICUS Conference on Science and Values, Los Angeles.

  • Hill, S. B. (1991). “Ecological and psychological prerequisites for the establishment of sustainable Prairie agricultural communities,” in J. Martin (ed.), Alternative Futures for Prairie Agricultural Communities (pp. 197–230). Edmonton: University of Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1973). “Resilience and stability in ecological systems,” Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, C. A. (1994). “Notes toward the definition of agriculture,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Supplement 7(1): 62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-food (1994). rBST in Canada. Ottawa: House of Commons, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. W. and A. L. Frohman (1989). “Identifying and closing the gap in the middle of organizations,” Academy of Management Executive 3: 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneen, B. (1989). From Land to Mouth: Understanding the Food System. Toronto: NC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodny, H. (1989), “Design skills and intensity of beliefs,” in S. Wright and D. Morley (eds.), Learning Works: Searching for Organizational Futures (pp. 36–46). Toronto: Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. and R. Lewontin (1985). The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebhardt, W. C. (ed.) (1993). The Dairy Debate: Consequences of Bovine Growth Hormone and Rotational Grazing Technologies. Davis, CA: University of California SAREP.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, R. J., S. B. Hill, J. Henning, and G. R. Mehuys (1989). “Agricultural science and sustainable agriculture: A review of the existing scientific barriers to sustainable food production and potential solutions,” Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 6: 173–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, R. J., S. B. Hill, J. Henning, and A. J. Bentley (1990a). “Policies, programs and regulations to support the transition to sustainable agriculture in Canada,” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 5: 76–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, R. J., S. B. Hill, G. R. Mehuys, and J. Henning (1990b). “Farm-scale agronomic and economic conversion from conventional to sustainable agriculture,” Advances in Agronomy 43: 155–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, R. J., J. Welsh, B. Kneen, and H. Friedmann (1992). “Municipal food policy councils: Diversifying institutional form and process to support the transition to just, healthy and sustainable food and agricultural systems,” Presentation to the Joint Meetings of the ASFS and AFHVS Diversity in Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Environment Conference, Lansing, MI, June 6.

  • MacRae, R. J., J. Henning, and S. B. Hill (1993). “Strategies to overcome barriers to the development of sustainable agriculture in Canada: The role of agribusiness,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6: 21–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, R. J. (1999) (in press). “This thing called food: Policy failure in the Canadian food and agriculture system,” in M. Koc, R. J. MacRae, L. Meugeot, and J. Welsh (eds.), For Hunger-proof Cities: Sustainable Urban Food Systems. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre and the Ryerson Centre for Studies in Food Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1972). “Will a large complex system be stable?” Nature (London) 238: 413–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (1975). The Politics of Food. Toronto: Lorimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1989). “Organizational choice and the new technology,” in S. Wright and D. Morley (eds.), Learning Works: Searching for Organizational Futures (pp. 47–62). Toronto: Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, D. and S. Wright (1989). “Epilogue: Organizational and contextual change,” in S. Wright and D. Morley (eds.), Learning Works: Searching for Organizational Futures (pp. 256–278). Toronto: Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P. (1984). “Properties of agroecosystems,” in R. Lowrance, B. Stinner, and G. House (eds.), Agricultural Ecosystems: Unifying Concepts (pp. 5–12). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (now OMAFRA) (1991). Common Ground Update, The Strategic Plan for the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Toronto: Queen's Printer for Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascale, R. T. (1990). Managing on the Edge. New York: Simon and Shuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J. and R. H. Waterman (1982). In Search of Excellence. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J. (1987). Thriving on Chaos. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumptre, T. W. (1988). Beyond the Bottom Line: Management in Government. Halifax, NS: Institute for Research in Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, P. M. (1992). Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidle, F. L. (1993). “Reshaping the federal government: Charting the course,” Policy Options July/August: 24–29.

  • Skogstad, G. (1987). The Politics of Agricultural Policy-Making in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solway, J. (1988). “Linkage, synergy and high performance economies,” Policy Options 9(9): 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (1993). Food Labels and Biotechnology: The Ethics of Safety and Consent. College Park, Texas: Centre for Biotechnology Policy and Ethics, Texas A&M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toronto Food Policy Council (1994). Health, Wealth and the Environment: The Impacts of the CUSTA, GATT and NAFTA on Canadian Food Security. Toronto: Toronto Food Policy Council Discussion Paper #2.

  • Ulrich, D. and M. F. Wiersema (1989). “Gaining strategic and organizational capability in a turbulent business environment,” Academy of Management Executive 3: 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Surgeon General (1988). Report on Nutrition and Health. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeman, M. M. and T. S. Veeman (1976). “The direction of Canadian agricultural policy,” Canadian J. Agricultural Economics 24: 78–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J. and C. S. Holling (1984). “Resilience and adaptability in ecological management systems: Why do policy models fail?” in G. R. Conway (ed.), Pest and Pathogen Control: Strategic, Tactical and Policy Models (pp. 470–479). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock, J. W. (1984), “Canadian grain and the industrial food system,” Presentation to Learned Societies Conference, Guelph, Ontario, 10 June.

  • Warnock, J. W. (1978). Profit Hungry: The food industry in Canada. Vancouver: New Star Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winson A. (1992). The Intimate Commodity. Toronto: Garamond Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worster, D. (1979). Nature's Economy: The Roots of Ecology. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press, Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrabley, R. B. (1989). “Neo-conservativism and social ecology: 1960s–1980s,” Our Generation 25(2): 18–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. and D. Morley (eds.) (1989). Learning Works: Searching for Organizational Futures. Toronto: Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacRae, R. Not just what, but how: Creating agricultural sustainability and food security by changing Canada's agricultural policy making process. Agriculture and Human Values 16, 187–202 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007528823700

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007528823700

Navigation