Article contents
Reason and Sensibility: The Ideal of Women's Self-Governance in die Writings of Mary Wollstonecraft
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2020
Abstract
It is standard in feminist commentaries to argue that Wollstonecraft's feminism is vitiated by her commitment to a liberal philosophical framework, relying on a valuation of reason over passion and on the notion of a sex-neutral self. I challenge this interpretation of Wollstonecraft's feminism and argue that her attempt to articulate an ideal of self-governance for women was an attempt to diagnose and resolve some of the tensions and inadequacies within traditional liberal thought.1
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.
References
Benhabib, Seyla. 1987. The generalized and the concrete other. In Feminism as critique, ed.Benhabib, Seyla and Cornell, Drucilla. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1986. Rousseau and Wollstonecraft: Nature vs. reason. In Women and philosophy, ed.Thompson, Janna. Supplement to Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64(June): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1991a. The oppressed state of my sex: Wollstonecraft on reason, feeling and equality. In Feminist interpretations and political theory, ed.Pateman, Carole and Shanley, Mary Lyndon. Cambridge: Polity Press; University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1991b. Feminism and philosophy: Perspectives on equality and difference. Cambridge: Polity Press; Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jean. 1989. Mary Wollstonecraft and the tensions in feminist philosophy. Radical Philosophy 52(Summer): 11–17.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1983. Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld; Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva, and Meyers, Diana T., eds. 1987. Women and moral theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The man of reason. London: Methuen; Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Jane Roland. 1985. Reclaiming a conversation: The ideal of the educated woman. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan. 1979. Women in Western political thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. [1755] 1973. Discourse on the origins of inequality. In “The Social Contract” and other discourses. London: Dent (Everyman's Library).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. [1762] 1974. Emile. London: Dent; New York Dutton (Everyman's Library).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. [1762] 1983. On the social contract; Discourse on the origin of inequality; Discourse on political economy. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Tapper, Marion. 1986. Can a feminist be a liberal? In Women and philosophy, ed.Thompson, Janna. Supplement to Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64(June): 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomalin, Claire. 1974. The life and death of Mary Wollstonecraft. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Todd, Janet M., ed. 1977. A Wollstonecraft anthology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. [1792] 1975. Vindication of the rights of woman, ed.Kramnick, Miriam. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1975.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. [1796] 1977. Letters written during a short residence in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. In A Wollstonecraft anthology, ed.Todd, Janet M.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. [1788] 1980a. Mary, A Fiction. In Mary and “The Wrongs of Woman,” ed.Kinsley, James and Kelly, Gary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. [1798] 1980b. The wrongs of woman; or, Maria: A fragment. In Mary and “The wrongs of woman,” eds. Kinsley, James, and Kelly, Gary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- 15
- Cited by