Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T04:05:31.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of Law in Ameliorating Global Inequalities in Indigenous Peoples' Health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Extract

State and international laws have often been instruments of oppression against Indigenous peoples, enabling and casting a veil of legitimacy over state actions that dispossess, assimilate, and discriminate. In the contemporary setting such law has, at times, come to be harnessed to support or protect Indigenous interests, including addressing Indigenous health deficits and associated injustices.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anaya, J., “Indigenous Law and Its Contribution to Global Pluralism,” Indigenous Law Journal 6, no. 1 (2007): 312, at 4.Google Scholar
The fact that there is a gross comparative health deficit in Indigenous communities around the world is well known. See, for example, Gracey, M. and King, M., “Indigenous Health Part 1: Determinants and Disease Patterns,” The Lancet 374 (2009): 6575; Stephens, C. et al., “Indigenous Peoples' Health – Why Are They behind Everyone, Everywhere?” The Lancet 366 (2005): 10–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See James (Sa'ke'j) Youngblood Henderson, Indigenous Diplomacy and the Rights of Peoples: Achieving UN Recognition (Saskatoon: Purich Publishing, 2008): at 29–36 for a discussion of the development and growth of the international Indigenous network whose members have engaged both with their home states as well as with the United Nations system. This network has likely played a central role in generating this interplay.Google Scholar
See Noble, B., “Justice, Transaction, Translation: Blackfoot Tipi Transfers and WIPO's Search for the Facts of Traditional Knowledge Exchange” American Anthropologist 109, no. 2 (2007): 338349, for a robust case-based analysis centering on Blackfoot law surrounding tipi transfers and WIPO practices. Citing other institutional ethnography in the UN system, Noble demonstrates how Indigenous peoples move nimbly and productively between multiple UN Forums, not just WIPO, to bring their concerns to bear positively in these international norm-building settings.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Stephens, et al., supra note 2, at 11; Anderson, I. and Whyte, J., “Populations at Special Health Risk: Indigenous Populations,” in Heggenhougen, H. K. and Quah, S. R., eds., International Encyclopedia of Public Health (Academic Press, 2008): 215224, at 215.Google Scholar
For a review of some definitions, see Anderson, and Whyte, , id., at 215–17. For a critical review of the implications of adopting various definitions, see Oguamanam, C., “Indigenous Peoples and International Law: The Making of a Regime,” Queen's Law Journal 30 (2004): 348399, at footnote 6.Google Scholar
Secretariat of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, “Introduction,” in United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, State of the World's Indigenous Peoples (New York: United Nations Publications, 2009): 111, at 4–7.Google Scholar
Id., at 5–6; Stephens, C. et al., “Disappearing, Displaced, and Undervalued: A Call to Action for Indigenous Health Worldwide,” The Lancet 367 (2006): 20192028, at 2020. For a robust discussion of the “local proliferation of the concept of ‘Indigenous’ as a potent identificatory framework,” see Muehlebach, A., “What Self in Self Determination? Notes from the Frontiers of Transnational Indigenous Activism,” Global Studies in Culture and Power 10 (2003): 241–268, at 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See summary of comments made by the International Labour Organization in response to specific questions from states, and summary of state descriptions of challenges with defining Indigenous peoples, in Indigenous and Tribal Peoples' Rights in Practice: A Guide to ILO Convention 169 (International Labour Standards Department, 2009): at 16–23.Google Scholar
Montenegro, R. A. and Stephens, C., “Indigenous Health in Latin American and the Caribbean,” The Lancet 367 (2006): 18591869, at 1860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, M., “Health,” in United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, State of the World's Indigenous Peoples (New York: United Nations Publications, 2009): 155187, at 165–67.Google Scholar
See Oguamanam, , supra note 6, at para. 54.Google Scholar
See Anderson, and Whyte, , supra note 5, at 215, 217.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly, Midterm Assessment of the Progress Made in the Achievement of the Goal and Objectives of the Second International Decade of the World's Indigenous People: Rep. of the Secretary-General, at para 65, U.N. Doc. A/65/166; 64th Sess. (July 23, 2010).Google Scholar
See MacIntosh, C., “Relational Theory, Indigenous Peoples and Health Laws and Policies,” in Downie, J. and Llewellyn, J., eds., Being Relational: Reflections on Relational Theory and Health Law and Policy (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2011): 230254, at 234–238.Google Scholar
Committee on Indigenous Health, The Geneva Declaration on the Health and Survival of Indigenous Peoples, WHO, Geneva, WHO/HSD/00.1 (1999).Google Scholar
World Health Organization International Symposium on the Social Determinants of Indigenous Health, “Social Determinants and Indigenous Health: The International Experience and Its Policy Implications” (2007), at 2, available at <http://www.who.int/social_determinants/resources/indigenous_health_adelaide_report_07.pdf> (last visited January 22, 2013).+(last+visited+January+22,+2013).>Google Scholar
Id. For a general discussion of how the term “self-determination” operates in international law vis-à-vis Indigenous peoples, see Muehlebach, A., supra note 8.Google Scholar
MacIntosh, C., “Indigenous Peoples and Health Law and Policy: Responsibilities and Obligations,” in Downie, J. Caulfield, T., and Flood, C., eds., Canadian Health Law and Policy, 4th ed. (Ontario: LexisNexis, 2011): 575614, at 577–78. For a discussion of what sorts of laws and policies align with supporting Indigenous health from a relational theory perspective, see MacIntosh, C., “Relational Theory, Indigenous Peoples and Health Law and Policies,” in Downie, J. and Llewellyn, J., eds., Being Relational: Reflections on Relational Theory and Health Law and Policy (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2012): 230–254.Google Scholar
The four indicators used to calculate the Human Development Index are: (1) life expectancy at birth; (2) mean years of schooling; (3) expected years of schooling; and (4) gross national income per capita. See “Components of the Human Development Index,” Human Development Index (2011), available at <http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/hdi/> (last visited January 22, 2013).+(last+visited+January+22,+2013).>Google Scholar
Diseases of poverty are also experienced more extremely in Indigenous communities. For example, tuberculosis is rampant among many Indigenous populations, despite it having a fairly contained presence within majority populations. Amazonian Indians and Maoris report tuberculosis rates at 10 times the national average in Brazil and New Zealand, respectively. In Greenland rates are 45 times higher for the Indigenous population. However, the most extreme documented examples may come from Canada, where rates are 35 times higher for members of First Nations, and 150 times higher for Inuit. See Coimbra, C. E. A. Jr., and Basta, P. C., “The Burden of Tuberculosis in Indigenous Peoples in Amazonia,” Brazil Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 101 (2007): 635636, at 635; see Cunningham, , supra note 11, at 158–159.Google Scholar
See Stephens, et al., supra note 7, at 2026.Google Scholar
Smylie, J. and Adomako, P., Indigenous Children's Health Report: Health Assessment in Action (Toronto: Centre for Research on Inner City Health, 2009): at 83. This survey information is for Indigenous populations in Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia, and the Northern Territory.Google Scholar
Health Canada, First Nations, Inuit and Aboriginal Health: Mental Health and Wellness, available at <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fniah-spnia/promotion/mental/index-eng.php> (last visited January 22, 2013).+(last+visited+January+22,+2013).>Google Scholar
King, M. Smith, A., and Gracey, M., “Indigenous Health Part 2: The Underlying Causes of the Health Gap,” The Lancet 374, (2009): 7685, at 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, C. and Lyons, T., Harm Reduction for Special Populations in Canada: Harm Reduction Policies and Programs for Persons of Aboriginal Descent, Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, June 2007, at 6.Google Scholar
Scoffield, H., “Painkiller Addiction Slams First Nations: ‘We Want You to Stop,’ Children Plead on Ontario Reserve,” Chronicle Herald, April 16, 2012, at B1. Local health officials indicate that almost the entire adult population of this 700 member community, other than elders, are confirmed or suspected addicts.Google Scholar
See Cunningham, , supra note 11, at 169.Google Scholar
See MacIntosh, (2011), supra note 19, at 609–14 for a discussion of the challenges of transforming the system in Canada into one that not only supports culturally appropriate health care, but also contributes to and develops decolonization practices.Google Scholar
Hunt, P., Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health to the Commission on Human Rights: Economic and Social Council, at para 12, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/2005/51; 61st Sess. (February 11, 2005).Google Scholar
See Cunningham, , supra note 10, at 166. Canada is one country that has provided support for such initiatives. See MacIntosh, C. (2011), supra note 19, at 580–81.Google Scholar
For example, the United Nations Sub-Commission on the Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities initiated its first study regarding Indigenous populations in 1972, which in turn led to the Working Group on Indigenous Populations being established in 1982. See Secretariat of the United Nations, supra note 5, at 1–3. Other key initiatives include the UN Voluntary Fund for Indigenous Populations (1985), ILO Convention 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries (1989), and the Proclamation of the International Year of the World's Indigenous People (1993).Google Scholar
See Anaya, , supra note 1.Google Scholar
See Hitchcock, R., “International Human Rights, the Environment, and Indigenous Peoples,” Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 5 (1994): 122, at 10–12 for a list of some specific development projects which involved the direct displacement of Indigenous communities in a variety of states.Google Scholar
See Anaya, , supra note 1, at 5.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly, Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, GA Res 61/295, UN Doc A/ RES/61/295; 61st Sess. (2007).Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Pinero, L., “‘Where Appropriate’: Monitoring/Implementing of Indigenous Peoples' Rights Under the Declaration,” in Charters, C. and Stavenhagen, R., eds., Making the Declaration Work: The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Copenhagen: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, 2009): 314342, at 318.Google Scholar
For a history of UNDRIP's negotiation, see Henderson, Sa'ke'j Young-Blood J., Indigenous Diplomacy and the Rights of Peoples: Achieving UN Recognition (Saskatoon: Purich Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar
See United Nations General Assembly, supra note 39, at Article 25.Google Scholar
For a discussion of Indigenous participatory rights under International law with a focus on environmental decision making, see Simons, P. and Collins, L., “Participatory Rights in the Ontario Mining Sector: An International Human Rights Perspective,” McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy 6 (2010): 177216, at paras. 13–17.Google Scholar
See MacIntosh, C., “Envisioning the Future of Aboriginal Health under the Health Transfer Process,” Health Law Journal (2008): 67100.Google Scholar
For a discussion of jurisprudence regarding the Treaty of Waitangi, its treatment through legislation, and the role of international law and norms within New Zealand, see Palmer, M., The Treaty of Waitangi in New Zealand's Law and Constitution (New Zealand: Victoria University Press, 2008): at 152–233.Google Scholar
New Zealand Public Health and Disability Act, 2000 No 91, s.4.Google Scholar
Id., part 3.Google Scholar
See discussion of the Maori health strategy in Durie, M., “Providing Health Services to Indigenous Peoples: A Combination of Conventional Services and Indigenous Programmes Is Needed,” British Medical Journal 327 (2003): 408409, at 408–409.Google Scholar
Whitinui, P., “The Treaty and ‘Treating’ Maori Health,” Anter-Native: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples 7, no. 2 (2011): 138151, at 145–148.Google Scholar
Kingi, T., “The Treaty of Waitangi: A Framework for Maori Health Development,” New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy 54, no. 1 (2007): 78.Google Scholar
Id., at 7.Google Scholar
Similar concerns have been raised regarding the Canadian approach to health devolution being overly focused on shifting administrative responsibilities instead of meaningfully transforming governance relationships and enabling the substantive improvement of health. See MacIntosh, , supra note 19 and MacIntosh, , supra note 44.Google Scholar
For a general discussion of concerns about legislating formulations of treaty obligations, see Palmer, , supra note 45, at 183.Google Scholar
See Kingi, , supra note 50, at 9.Google Scholar
Durie, M., “Universal Provision, Indigeneity and the Treaty of Waitangi,” Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 33 (2002): 167178, at 173–74.Google Scholar
Durie, M., Public Sector Reform, Indigeneity, and the Goals of Maori Development, Commonwealth Advanced Seminar, Wellington NZ (February 2004), available at <http://ebook-browse.com/m-durie-public-sector-reform-indigeneity-and-the-goals-of-maori-development-pdf-d44708296> (last visited January 22, 2013).Google Scholar
Convention (No. 169) Concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries, June 27, 1989, reprinted in 28 I.L.M. 1382 (1989) (entered into force 5 September 1991) [ILO 169] at article 7(1), at <http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C169> (last visited January 22, 2013).+(last+visited+January+22,+2013).>Google Scholar
Indigenous & Tribal Peoples' Rights in Practice: A Guide to ILO Convention No. 169, International Labour Standards Department, 2009, at 40.Google Scholar
Magar, Gaha S., “ILO 169: Nepal as a Model,” Nepali Times, Issue 541 (February 18, 2011-February 24, 2011), available at <http://www.nepalitimes.com/issue/2011/02/18/FromtheNepaliPress/17961> (last visited January 22, 2013).+(last+visited+January+22,+2013).>Google Scholar
See Kingi, , supra note 50, at 9.Google Scholar
See Durie, , supra note 56, at 169–170. See also Kingi, , supra note 50, at 9.Google Scholar
E.g., Article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, GA Res. 2200A (XXI), 21 UN GAOR Supp. No. 16, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 933 UNTS 3 (entered into force 3 January 1976) recognizes “the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.” The American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, OAS, General Assembly, OAS/Ser.L/V/I.4 Rev. 9; 9th Sess. (1948) sets out in art XI that “every person has the right to the preservation of his health through sanitary and social measures relating to food, clothing, housing and medical care….”.Google Scholar
CESCR General Comment 14, The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health, at para 27, U.N. Doc. E/C.12/2000/4; 22nd Sess. (2000).Google Scholar
See International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, supra note 63, at Article 2.1. (emphasis added).Google Scholar
Brandon, E., “Does International Law Mean anything in Canadian Courts,” Journal of Environmental Law and Practice 11 (2002): 397443.Google Scholar
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Articles 16 and 17 of the Covenant: Concluding Observations of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Canada, at para 11, E/C.12/CAN/CO4, E/C.12/CAN/CO/5; 36th Sess. (May 22, 2006).Google Scholar
I discussed above some of the reasons why states may be reluctant to recognize Indigenous health rights, in particular, as legally enforceable. There are also many general reasons why states may be reluctant to recognize enforceable health rights. These include concerns about escalating costs. See, for example, Jackman, M., The Implications of Section 7 of the Charter for Health Care Spending in Canada (Saskatoon: Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, 2002), at 11–16, available at <http://www.srap.ca/publications/jackman_the_implications_of%20section_7.pdf> (last visited January 22, 2013). They may also reflect practical challenges. For example, in Canada health care services have developed in a complex fashion, with roles having been spread out and between multiple entities. These include federal and provincial governments, as well as municipal ones. Health care regulatory bodies, local health authorities, regional health care entities and of course individual health care professionals are all involved. In such a context, baseline accountability has proven to be a political and practical challenge. Commenting on the accountability problem, see Flood, C. Sinclair, D., and Erdman, J., “Steering and Rowing in Health Care: The Devolution Option,” Queen's Law Journal 30 (2004): 156204, at para. 1: “[W]here does a patient turn when told there is no hospital bed available? To her physician, the hospital, or the provincial government of the day as represented by the Minister of Health? When a nurse is worried about the impact of a part-time rather than full-time employment policy, to whom does she turn for answers? Does she look to the collective agreement, bargaining agent, hospital CEO or board, or to the provincial Minister of Health? Should these protagonists look, in extremis, to the federal Minister of Health? The answers to these inquiries are ambiguous at best; at worst, there are no answers. Who is accountable for health care?”.Google Scholar
See Oguamanam, , supra note 6, at para. 5.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly, 86th Plenary Meeting, U.N. Doc. A/RES/48/163 (December 21, 1993) (emphasis added).Google Scholar
Another key accomplishment was the Commission on Human Rights appointing a Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Indigenous Peoples in 2001. See Secretariat of the United Nations, supra note 7, at 3.Google Scholar
World Health Association Resolutions WHA53.10 and WHA54.16. See also WHA51.24.Google Scholar
Secretariat of the United Nations, supra note 7, at 3.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly, Draft Programme of Action for the Second International Decade of the World's Indigenous People: Rep. of the Secretary-General, at para 2, U.N. Doc. A/60/150; 60th Sess. (August 18, 2005).Google Scholar
Id., at para 3.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly, Second International Decade of the World's Indigenous People, supra note 14, at para 4. See also Muehlebach, , supra note 8, where Muehlebach explores how the polyvalences and indeterminacies of the term ‘self-determination’ are part of why calls for self-determination has resulted in such a flexible and powerful dialogue about Indigenous rights and futures, and Noble, , supra note 4.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly, Draft Programme of Action, supra note 74, at para. 1.Google Scholar
Id., at para. 9.Google Scholar
Id., at para 40 (emphasis added).Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly, Second International Decade of the World's Indigenous People, supra note 14, at para. 65.Google Scholar
Id., at para. 87(b).Google Scholar
Id., at para. 55.Google Scholar
See ILO 169, supra note 58.Google Scholar
Anaya, J., Indigenous Peoples in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004): at 58.Google Scholar
American Convention on Human Rights, OASTS No 26, 1144 UNTS 123 (entered into force July 18, 1978).Google Scholar
Application of Convention No. 169 by Domestic and International Courts in Latin America: A Casebook (Geneva: International Labour Organization, 2009): at 111, available at <http://www.ilo.org/indigenous/Resources/Guidelinesandmanuals/WCMS_123946/lang–en/index.htm> (last visited January 22, 2013). The case is Judgment T-704/06, August 22, 2006, Columbia Constitutional Court.+(last+visited+January+22,+2013).+The+case+is+Judgment+T-704/06,+August+22,+2006,+Columbia+Constitutional+Court.>Google Scholar
Id., at 113.Google Scholar
Ombudsman v. National Government and another (Chaco Province), Reference for a Preliminary Ruling, Judgment of September 18, 2007 (National Supreme Court of Justice, Argentina), as cited id., at 48.Google Scholar
As cited id., at 82. Constitutional Court of Columbia, Judgment C-088/01, January 31, 2001.Google Scholar
See United Nations General Assembly, supra note 37, at Article 23.Google Scholar
American Convention on Human Rights, OASTS No 26, 1144 UNTS 123 (entered into force July 18, 1978). Complaints regarding non-compliance can go one of two routes. As a default mechanism, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights can hear complaints from individuals and NGOs, and make recommendations (Arts 48–51). States may also recognize the jurisdiction of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, in which case the Court has authority to determine violations, and to order remedies (Arts 61–63).Google Scholar
Id., at Article 4.Google Scholar
Yakye Axa Indigenous Community v. Paraguay, 2005 Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (ser C) No 125, p33 (June 17, 2005).Google Scholar
Keener, S. and Vasquez, J., “A Life Worth Living: Enforcement of the Right to Health through the Right to Life in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights,” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 40 (2009): 595624, at 608.Google Scholar
See Yakye Axa, supra note 93, at 161–62, as cited in Keener, and Vasquez, , id., at 608.Google Scholar
See Yakye Axa, supra note 93, at 221, as cited in Keener, and Vasquez, , id., at 611.Google Scholar
Id. (Keener and Vasquez), at 611.Google Scholar
Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous Community v Paraguay, 2006 Inter-Am Ct. H.R. (ser. C) No 146, March 29, 2006, at 178, as cited in Keener, and Vasquez, , id.Google Scholar
Sawhoyamaxa, , id., at 155, as cited in Keener, and Vasquez, , id., at 612.Google Scholar
e.g., United Nations General Assembly, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 217 A (III), available at <http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6b3712c.html> (last visited May 25, 2012); The Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11. See Keener, and Vasquez, , id., for a general discussion of the potential of these precedents to provide content to the right to life and health rights.+(last+visited+May+25,+2012);+The+Constitution+Act,+1982,+being+Schedule+B+to+the+Canada+Act+1982+(UK),+1982,+c+11.+See+Keener,+and+Vasquez,+,+id.,+for+a+general+discussion+of+the+potential+of+these+precedents+to+provide+content+to+the+right+to+life+and+health+rights.>Google Scholar
De Schutter, Olivier, Special Rapporteur on the right to food, “Visit to Canada from 6 to 16 May 2012 – End-of-mission statement” (Geneva: United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, 2012), available at <http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=12159&LangID=E> (last visited January 22, 2013).Google Scholar
Egeland, G. et al., “Food Insecurity among Inuit Preschoolers: Nunavut Inuit Child Health Survey, 2007–2008,” Canadian Medical Association Journal 182 (2010): 243248, at 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, National Assessment of First Nations Water and Wastewater Systems: National Roll-Up Report Final (Ottawa: INAC, 2011): at 16. A total of 571 out of the 587 reserve-based First Nations participated in the study, so its figures can be considered representative (at i). It is important to note that these water systems serve different sized communities. Although 39% of water systems are high risk, they serve 25% – not 39% – of the reserve-based population in Canada at 16. See MacIntosh, C., “Indigenous Public Health and Fiduciary Liability: Exploring Litigation as an Answer to Unacceptable On-Reserve Water Quality,” in Jackman, M. and Porter, B., eds., Reconceiving Human Rights Practice for the New Social Rights Paradigm (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2012) (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Gosselin v. Quebec (Attorney General), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 429, 2002 SCC 84 at para 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization, Report of the International Consultation on the Health of Indigenous Peoples (1999) WHO/HSD/00.1 (Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000).Google Scholar
See the collection of articles in Charter, Claire and Stavenhagen, Rodolfo, eds., Making the Declaration Work: The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Copenhagen: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, 2009).Google Scholar