Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T06:12:20.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Stakeholder–Human Capital Perspective on the Link between Social Performance and Executive Compensation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Peter M. Madsen  and
John B. Bingham
Peter M. Madsen
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University
John B. Bingham
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The link between firm corporate social performance (CSP) and executive compensation could be driven by a sorting effect (a firm’s CSP is related to the initial levels of compensation of newly hired executives), or by an incentive effect (incumbent executives are rewarded for past firm CSP). Existing empirical work focuses exclusively on the incentive effect. In contrast, in this paper we explore the sorting effect of firm CSP on the initial compensation of newly hired executives. In doing so, we develop a novel theoretical approach based on an integration of stakeholder theory and human capital theory, suggesting a positive association between the initial compensation of executives and firm CSP strengths and concerns. It also suggests that the strength of this relationship varies between different executive roles (as a function of stakeholder-management responsibilities). We find support for this theoretical framework in a large sample of newly-hired executives employed by Standard & Poor 1500 firms.

Keywords

Corporate social performanceexecutive compensationstakeholder theoryhuman-capital theory
Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 1 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdel-khalik, A.R. 2003. Self-sorting, incentive compensation and human-capital assets. European Accounting Review, 12: 661–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638180310001628428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agarwal, N.C. 1981. Determinants of executive compensation. Industrial Relations, 20: 36–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.1981.tb00180.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agle, B.R., Donaldson, T., Freeman, R.E., Jensen, M.C., Mitchell, R.K., & Wood, D.J. 2008. Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18: 153–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200818214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agle, B.R., Mitchell, R.K., & Sonnenfeld, J.A. 1999. Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 507–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albinger, H.S., & Freeman, S.J. 2000. Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28: 243–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006289817941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, W.E., & Sinkula, J.M. 2005. Environmental marketing strategy and firm performance: Effects on new product performance and market share. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33: 461–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092070305276119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banker, R.D., Hu, N., Pavlou, P.A., & Luftman, J. 2011. CIO reporting structure, strategic positioning, and firm performance. MIS Quarterly, 35: 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, T.N., & Aiman-Smith, L. 1996. Green career choices: The influence of ecological stance on recruiting. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10: 445–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02251780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G.S. 1962. Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70 (5): 9–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/258724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G.S. 1964. Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S. 1993. Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, B.W., & Davidson, W.N. 2010. The relation between stakeholder management, firm value, and CEO compensation: A test of enlightened value maximization. Financial Management, Autumn 2010: 929–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01100.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L.R. 2009. Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 103–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.36461950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, C.B., Sen, S., & Korschun, D. 2008. Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49 (2): 37–44.Google Scholar
Bingham, J.B., Dyer, W.G., Smith, I., & Adams, G.L. 2011. A stakeholder identity orientation approach to corporate social performance in family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 99 (4): 565–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0669-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, M.M. 1995. Ownership and control: Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Borjas, G.J. 2008. Labor economics (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
Bowen, H.R. 1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Bradley, M., Schipani, C.A., Sundaram, A.K., & Walsh, J.P. 1999. The purposes and accountability of the corporation in contemporary society: Corporate governance at a crossroads. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62 (3): 9–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1192226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. 2007. The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18: 1701–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190701570866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brander, J.A. 2006. The effect of ethical fund portfolio inclusion on executive compensation. Journal of Business Ethics, 69: 317–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9093-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T.J., & Dacin, P.A. 1997. The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61 (1): 68–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cable, D.M., & Turban, D.B. 2003. The value of organizational reputation in the recruitment context: A brand-equity perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33: 2244–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01883.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A.B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4: 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterji, A.K., Levine, D.I., & Toffel, M.W. 2009. How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility?. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18: 125–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00210.xGoogle Scholar
Cone Communications. 2007. 2007cause evolution and environmental survey. Cone Communications Public Relations and Marketing. http://www.conecomm.com/2007-cause-evolution-and-environmental-survey. Accessed February 6, 2014.Google Scholar
Coombs, J.E., & Gilley, K.M. 2005. Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 827–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, T.R., Todd, S.Y., Combs, J.G., Woehr, D.J., & Ketchen, D.J. 2011. Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 443–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dacin, P.A., & Brown, T.J. 2006. Corporate branding, identity, and customer response. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34: 95–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeAngelo, L.E. 1982. Unrecorded human assets and the “hold up” problem. Journal of Accounting Research, 20: 272–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2490776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deckop, J.R., Merriman, K.K., & Gupta, S. 2006. The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 32: 329–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206305280113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, K.A., & Munk, N. 1997. Kinder, gentler M.B.A.s. Forbes, 159 (11): 39–40.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14: 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C.C.Y., & Mishra, D.R. 2011. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35: 2388–2406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elms, H., Johnson-Cramer, M., & Berman, S. 2011. Bounding the world’s miseries: Corporate responsibility and Freeman’s stakeholder theory. In Phillips, R.A. (Ed.), Stakeholder theory: Impact and prospects: 1–38. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. 1990. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 233–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach Marshfield, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, (September 13).Google Scholar
Frye, M.B., Nelling, E., & Webb, E. 2006. Executive compensation in socially responsible firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14: 446–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00517.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, P.C., Merrill, C.B., & Hansen, J.M. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 425–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greening, D.W., & Turban, D.B. 2000. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39: 254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000765030003900302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groysberg, B., Kelly, L.K., & MacDonald, B. 2011. The new path to the c-suite. Harvard Business Review, 89 (3): 60–71.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D.C., & Finkelstein, S. 1995. The effects of ownership structure on conditions at the top: The case of CEO pay raises. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 175–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrick, D.C., & Mason, P.A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D., & Helfat, C. 1997. Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 895–920.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199712)18:11<895::AID-SMJ931>3.0.CO;2-R3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J., & Wicks, A. 2013. Stakeholder Theory, Value and Firm Performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23 (1): 97–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq20132314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, A.D., & Fredrickson, J.W. 1996. Information-processing demands as a determinant of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 575–606. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C.W.L., & Jones, T.M. 1992. Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29: 131–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, A.J., & Keim, G.D. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line?. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 125–39.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ittner, C.D., & Larcker, D.F. 1998. Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. Journal of Accounting Research, 36 (3): 1–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2491304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ittner, C.D., & Larcker, D.F. 2003. Coming up short on nonfinancial performance measurement. Harvard Business Review, 81 (11): 88–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Jawahar, I.M., & McLaughlin, G.L. 2001. Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, 26: 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M.C. 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12: 235–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3857812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T., & Felps, W. 2013. Shareholder wealth maximization and social welfare: A utilitarian critique. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23 (2): 207–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq201323215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadan, O., & Swinkels, J.M. 2008. Stocks or options? Moral hazard, firm viability, and the design of compensation contracts. Review of Financial Studies, 21: 451–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. 1996. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74 (1): 75–85.Google Scholar
Kim, S.H. 2008. Examination of executive compensation determinants in the hospitality industry: A quantile regression approach Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma City.Google Scholar
Kochan, T.A., & Rubinstein, S.A. 2000. Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn partnership. Organization Science, 11: 367–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.367.14601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazear, E.P. 1998. Personnel economics for managers New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lazear, E.P. 2000. Performance pay and productivity. American Economic Review, 90: 1346–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.5.1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazear, E.P., & Oyer, P. 2004. The structure of wages and internal mobility. American Economic Review, 94 (2): 212–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0002828041302253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., & Mauer, D.C. 2010. Corporate cash holdings and CEO compensation incentives. Journal of Financial Economics(October 25). Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1492468.http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1492468Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Mackey, T.B., & Barney, J.B. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32: 817–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 268–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3556659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, J.E., & Berman, S.L. 2006. Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenberg Domini ratings data. Business & Society, 45: 20–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0007650305281939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J., Dow, S., & Argheyd, K. 2003. CEO incentives and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 45: 341–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024119604363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 2002. Additional reflections on the strategic implications of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 27: 15–16.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22: 853–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitroff, I. 1983. Stakeholders of the organizational mind San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S.L. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24: 403–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandher, G., & Currie, R. 2013. CEO compensation: A resource advantage and stakeholderbargaining perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 22–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penn, Schoen. & Berland Associates, 2010. Corporate Citizenship Study. March. http://www.burson-marsteller.com/what-we-do/our-thinking/corporate-social-responsibility-branding-survey-2010/.Google Scholar
Porter, M.E., & van der Linde, C. 1995a. Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73 (5): 120–34.Google Scholar
Porter, M.E., & van der Linde, C. 1995b. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (4): 97–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.94.97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prendergast, C. 1999. The provision of incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 37: 7–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.1.7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupp, D.E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R.V., & Williams, C.A. 2006. Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 537–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuler, D.A., & Cording, M. 2006 A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Academy of Management Review, 3: 540–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.21318916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoones, D., & Bernhardt, D. 1998 Promotion, turnover, and discretionary human capital acquisition. Journal of Labor Economics, 16: 122–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souder, D., & Bromiley, P. 2012 Explaining temporal orientation: Evidence from the durability of firms’ capital investments. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 550–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturman, M.C., Walsh, K., & Cheramie, R.A. 2008 The value of human capital specificity versus transferability. Journal of Management, 34: 290–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206307312509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turban, D.B., & Cable, D.M. 2003 Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24 (6): 733–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turban, D.B., & Greening, D.W. 1997 Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 658–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/257057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddock, S. 2003 Myths and realities of social investing. Organization & Environment, 16: 369–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1086026603256284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wartick, S.L., & Cochran, P.L. 1985 The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10: 758–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whetten, D.A., Rands,, G., & Godfrey, P.C. 2002. What are the responsibilities of business to society?. In Pettigrew, A., Thomas, H., & Whittington, R. (Eds.), Handbook of strategy and management: 373–410. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wong, E.M., Ormiston, M.E., & Tetlock, P.E. 2011 The effects of top management team integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 1207–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.0762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D.J. 1991 Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16: 691–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D.J. 2010 Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12: 50–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00274.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, J.M. 2001. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar