Skip to main content
Log in

Model-Based and Manipulative Abduction in Science

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What I call theoretical abduction (sentential and model-based)certainly illustrates much of what is important in abductive reasoning, especially the objective of selecting and creating a set of hypotheses that are able to dispense good (preferred) explanations of data, but fails to account for many cases of explanation occurring in science or in everyday reasoning when the exploitation of the environment is crucial. The concept of manipulative abduction is devoted to capture the role of action in many interesting situations: action provides otherwise unavailable information that enables the agent to solve problems by starting and performing a suitable abductive process of generation or selection of hypotheses. Many external things, usually inert from the epistemological point of view, can be transformed into what I callepistemic mediators, which are illustrated in the last part of the paper, together with an analysis of the related notions of ``perceptual and inceptual rehearsal'' and of ``external representation''.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Boutilier, C. and V. Becher: 1995, Abduction as Belief Revision, Artificial Intelligence 77: 43–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornuéjols, A., A. Tiberghien and G. Collet: 2000, A New Mechanism for Transfer Between Conceptual Domains in Scientific Discovery and Education. Foundations of Science 5(2): 129–155. Special Issue on Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery: Learning and Discovery, L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian, and P. Thagard, eds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, G.: 1632, Dialogues Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, S. Drake (trans.), M.R. Matthews (ed.) (1989), 61–81.

  • Gooding, D.: 1990, Experiment and the Making of Meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, D. and T.R. Addis: 1999, A Simulation of Model-Based Reasoning about Disparate Phenomena. In L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian and P. Thagard (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G.: 1966, Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K.J. and P. Thagard: 1995,Mental Leaps. Analogy in Creative Thought. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E.: 1995, Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press. Ippolito,M.F. and R.D. Tweney: 1995, The Inception of Insight. In The Nature of Insight. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press, 433–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P.N.: 1983, Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1929, Critique of Pure Reason, N. Kemp Smith (trans.).London: MacMillan, reprint 1998; originally published 1787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirlik, A.: 1998, The Ecological Expert: Acting to Create Information to Guide Action. In Proceedings of the 1998 Conference on Human Interaction with Complex Systems(HICS'98). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: 1992, Abductive Reasoning: Philosophical and Educational Perspectives in Medicine. In D.A. Evans and V.L. Patel (eds.), AdvancedModels of Cognition for Medical Training and Practice. Berlin: Springer, 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: 1999a, Model-Based Creative Abduction. In L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian and P. Thagard (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: 1999b, Inconsistencies and Creative Abduction in Science. In AI and Scientific Creativity. Proceedings of the AISB99 Symposium on Scientific Creativity. Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour, Edinburgh College of Art and Division of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: 2001a, Abduction, Reason, and Science. Processes of Discovery and Explanation. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: 2001b, Philosophy and Geometry. Theoretical and Historical Issues. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: 2002, EpistemicMediators and Model-Based Discovery in Science. In L. Magnani and N.J. Nersessian (eds.), 305–329.

  • Magnani, L., S. Civita and G. Previde Massara: 1994, Visual Cognition and Cognitive Modeling. In V. Cantoni (ed.), Human and Machine Vision: Analogies and Divergences. New York: Plenum, 229–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. and R. Dossena: 2002, Perceiving the Infinite and the Infinitesimal World: Unveiling and Optical Diagrams and the Construction of Mathematical Concepts, Foundations of Science, forthcoming.

  • Magnani, L. and N.J. Nersessian (eds.): 2002, Model-Based Reasoning. Science. Technology, Values. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L., N.J. Nersessian and P. Pizzi (eds.): 2002, Logical and Computational Aspects of Model-Based Reasoning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.R. (ed.): 1989, The Scientific Background to Modern Philosophy. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S.: 1843, A System of Logic. Reprinted in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J.M. Robson (ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A.I.: 1992, Scientific Creativity: A Comparative Study of Henri Poincaré and Albert Einstein, Creativity Research Journal9: 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M.S. and M. Morrison (eds.): 1999, Models as Mediators. Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N.J.: 1998, Kuhn and the Cognitive Revolution, Configurations 6: 87–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N.J.: 1999, Model-Based Reasoning in Conceptual Change. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian and P. Thagard (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A.: 1990, Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A.: 1993, Things that Make Us Smart. Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S.: 1955a, Abduction and Induction, in: C.S. Peirce. Philosophical Writings of Peirce, J. Buchler (ed.). New York: Dover, 150–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S.: 1955b, Perceptual Judgments, in: C.S. Peirce. Philosophical Writings of Peirce, J. Buchler (ed.). New York: Dover, 302–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S.: 1931-1958 (CP), Collected Papers, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne and P Weiss (vols. I-VI), and A.W. Burks (vols. VII-VIII) (eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1974, Adaptation and Intelligence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London/New York: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramoni, M., M. Stefanelli, L. Magnani and G. Barosi: 1992, An Epistemological Framework for Medical Knowledge-Based Systems, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 22(6): 1361–1375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, C.: 1996, Visual Abductive Reasoning in Archaeology, Philosophy of Science 63(2): 278–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P.: 1988, Computational Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. 1992, Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweney, R.D.: 1996, Presymbolic Processes in Scientific Creativity, Creativity Research Journal 9(2-3): 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweney, R.D.: forthcoming,What Happened to the Brass and Glass? The Rise of Statistical “Instruments” in Psychology, 1900-1950, Archives for the History of American Psychology.

  • Zhang, J.: 1997, The Nature of External Representations in Problem Solving, Cognitive Science 21(2): 179–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. and D.A. Norman: 1994, Representations in Distributed Cognitive Tasks, Cognitive Science 18: 87–122.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magnani, L. Model-Based and Manipulative Abduction in Science. Foundations of Science 9, 219–247 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODA.0000042841.18507.22

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODA.0000042841.18507.22

Navigation