Skip to main content
Log in

Negative Freedom, Rational Deliberation, and Non-Satiating Goods

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Negative freedom (as opposed to positive freedom) has been widely considered an inherently non problematic notion. This paper attempts to show that, if considered as a good with a minimally objective structure, negative freedom can disrupt the capacity for deliberating in a substantively (that is, non purely formal, decision-theoretic) rational way. The argument turns on the notion of non-satiation, as a property of the objective value of some goods of not changing when the availability of the good is increased. Two classes of non-satiating goods are distinguished, one of which has disruptive consequences for rational deliberation. Negative freedom belongs to this last class; and its non-satiating conceptual nature is defended by means of a simple dispositional analysis of value. It is suggested that also rationality itself can be regarded as a non-satiating good that can disrupt deliberation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainslie, George: 1992, Picoeconomics. The Strategic Interaction of Successive Motivational States within the Person, Cambridge University Press.

  • Berlin, Isahia: 1979, Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford University Press.

  • Broome, John: 1991, Weighing Goods, Blackwell.

  • Carter, Ian: 1995, 'The Independent Value of Freedom', Ethics 105.

  • Dworkin, Gerard: 1988, The Theory and Practice of Autonomy, Cambridge University Press.

  • Hurka, Thomas: 1987, 'Why Value Autonomy?', Social Theory and Practice 13.

  • Kreps, David: 1990, A Course in Microeconomic Theory, Harvester-Wheatsheaf.

  • MacCallum, G. C: 1967, 'Negative and Positive Freedom', Philosophical Review 76.

  • Rawls, John: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press.

  • Raz, Joseph: 1986, The Morality of Freedom, Clarendon Press.

  • Smith, Michael: 1993, 'Objectivity and Moral Realism: On the Significance of the Phenomenology of Moral Experience', J. Haldane and C. Wright (eds.), Reality, Representation, and Projection, Oxford University Press.

  • Steiner, Hillel: 1994, An Essay on Rights, Blackwell.

  • Williams, Bernard: 1993, Problems of the Self, Cambridge University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magri, T. Negative Freedom, Rational Deliberation, and Non-Satiating Goods. Topoi 17, 97–105 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006074426629

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006074426629

Keywords

Navigation