Skip to main content
Log in

Higher-Order Thought, Self-Identification, and Delusions of Disownership

  • Published:
Review of Philosophy and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

David Rosenthal’s higher-order thought (HOT) theory says that for a mental state to be conscious, it must be accompanied by a higher-order thought about that state. One objection to Rosenthal’s account is that HOTs do not secure what Sydney Shoemaker has called ‘immunity to error through misidentification’ (IEM). I will argue that Rosenthal’s discussion of dissociative identity order fails to salvage his account from this objection and that his thin immunity principle is in tension with cases of somatoparaphrenia. Rather than showing that self-awareness consists in identification, an examination of the delusions of disownership found in dissociative identity disorder and somatoparaphrenia lends support to IEM and highlights an important distinction between perspectival ownership and personal ownership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a discussion of the inner-sense model, or what some theorists have called the higher-order perception (HOP) account of consciousness, see David Armstrong, (1980), The Nature of Mind. Rosenthal has argued repeatedly that the HOT account is superior to Armstrong’s HOP account. However, a discussion of this debate is beyond the scope of this paper.

  2. This minimal self-concept need not specify what sort of thing the self is, nor that it has some sort of unity or be transparent to itself, nor even that it has mental properties.

  3. The truth value of this proposition in any possible world w depends solely on whether or not s is F in w.

  4. http://www.npr.org/2011/10/20/141514464/real-sybil-admits-multiple-personalities-were-fake

References

  • Albahari, M. 2006. Analytical Buddhism: The two-tiered illusion of self. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braude, S. 1995. First-person Plural: Multiple Personality and the Philosophy of Mind. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coliva, A. 2002. Thought insertion and immunity to error through misidentification. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and. Psychology 9 (1): 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, T.E., and A. Venneri. 2014. Somatoparaphrenia: Evolving theories and concepts. Cortex 61: 74–80.

  • Gallagher, S. 2015. Seeing without an I: Another look at immunity to error through misidentification. In Mind Language and Action: Proceedings of the 36 th International Wittgenstein Symposium, ed. D. Moyal-Sharrock, A. Coliva, and V. Munz. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, J., and S. Matthews. 2003. The unity and disunity of agency. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and. Psychology 10 (4): 305–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, T., and C. Liang. 2010. Mental ownership and higher-order thought: Response to Rosenthal. Analysis 70 (3): 496–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, T., and C. Liang. 2011. Self-consciousness and immunity. The Journal of Philosophy 108 (2): 78–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, C., and T. Lane. 2009. Higher-order thought and pathological self: The case of somatoparaphrenia. Analysis 69 (4): 661–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. 1999. Immunity to error through misidentification. Philosophical Topics 1-2: 271–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F. 2012. Immunity to error through misidentification: Where it is and where it comes from. In Immunity to Error Through Misidentification: New Essays, ed. Simon Prosser and Francois Recanati. Cambridge University Press.

  • Rosenthal, D. 1997. A theory of consciousness. In The Nature of Consciousness, ed. N. Block, O. Flanagan, and G. Guzeldere. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. 2003. Unity of consciousness and the self. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103: 325–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. 2004. Being conscious of ourselves. The Monist 87 (2): 159–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. 2005. Consciousness and Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. 2010. Consciousness, the self and bodily location. Analysis 70 (2): 270–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. 2012. Awareness and identification of self. In Consciousness and the Self, ed. J. Liu and J. Perry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S. 1968. Self-reference and self-awareness. Journal of Philosophy 65 (19): 555–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S. 1994. Self-knowledge and ‘inner sense. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54: 249–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D., and J. Parnas. 1998. Phenomenal consciousness and self- awareness: A phenomenological critique of representational theory. Journal of Consciousness Studies 5-6: 687–705.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Maiese.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maiese, M. Higher-Order Thought, Self-Identification, and Delusions of Disownership. Rev.Phil.Psych. 10, 281–298 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0369-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0369-9

Navigation