Abstract
In seinem bekannten Buch über das „Sehen” des Menschen1 macht David Marr im ersten Kapitel folgende rückblickende Bemerkung:
„The problems of visual perception have attracted the curiosity of scientists for many centuries. [...] Early in this century, Wertheimer (1912, 1923) noticed the apparent motion not of individual dots but of wholes, or “fields”, in images presented sequentially as in a movie. [...] This observation started the Gestalt school of psychology, which was concerned with describing the qualities of wholes by using terms like solidarity and distinctness, and with trying to formulate the “laws” that governed the creation of these wholes. The attempt failed for various reasons, and the Gestalt school dissolved into the fog of subjectivism. With the death of the school, many of its early and genuine insights were unfortunately lost to the mainstream of experimental psychology.“ (p. 8/9)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Carnap, R. (1923) „Über die Aufgabe der Physik und die Anwendung des Grundsatzes der Einfachstheit”, Kantstudien 28, 90–107.
Carnap, R. (1926) Physikalische Begriffsbildung, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt 1966.
Carnap, R. (1927) „Eigentliche und uneigentliche Begriffe”, Zeitschrift für Forschung und Aussprache, Bd. 1, 355–374.
Carnap, R. (1928) Der logische Außau der Welt, Felix Meiner (1961).
Carnap, R. (1931) „Die physikalische Sprache als Universalsprache der Wissenschaft”, Erkenntnis Bd.2, 422–465.
Carnap, R. (1934) Logische Syntax der Sprache, Springer, Wien, NY.
Friedman, M. (1992) “Epistemology in the Aufbau,” Synthese 93, 15–57.
Friedman, M. (1999) Reconsidering Logical Positivism, Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, NY.
Helmholtz, H. von, (1868) „Die neueren Fortschritte in der Theorie des Sehens”, in Vorträge und Reden, Band 1.
Hilbert, D. (1918) „Axiomatisches Denken”, Math. Annalen, 78, 405–415.
Hilbert, D. (1920) Probleme der mathematischen Logik, Vorlesungsskript ausg. von Bernays und Schönfinkel, Math. Inst. Univ. Göttingen.
Majer, U. (2003) „Ramsey’s Defence of Russell’s Logicism in the Light of Hilbert’s Critique of Russell’s Logicism and Weyl’s Intuitionism”. In: Belief Truth and Probability. Essays in the Centenary of Frank Plumpton Ramsey, ed. by Maria J. Frapolli (forthcoming).
Marr, D. (1982) Vision — A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information, New York.
Mormann, T. (2002) „Synthetic Geometry and Aufbau: On the Geometric Origins of Carnap’s Constitutional Theory” (in diesem Band).
Richardson, A.W (1998) Carnap’s Construction of the World, Cambridge University Press.
Russell, B. (1910) Principia Mathematica, with A.N. Whitehead, Cambridge University Press.
Russell, B. (1912) The Problems of Philosophy, London.
Tennant, N. (1987) „The Life and Work of the Early Carnap” in Scientific Inquiry in Philosophical Perspective, ed. by N. Rescher, CPS Publications in Philosophy of Science, University Press of America.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Majer, U. (2003). Carnaps Übernahme der Gestalttheorie in den Aufbau im Lichte heutiger, vor allem computationaler theorien des sehens. In: Bonk, T. (eds) Language, Truth and Knowledge. Vienna Circle Institute Library [2003], vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0151-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0151-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6258-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0151-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive