Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the status of the postulate of recovery in the logic of theory change

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. AlchourrónCarlos E., PeterGärdenfors and DavidMakinson, ‘On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (1985), 510–530.

    Google Scholar 

  2. AlchourrónCarlos E. and DavidMakinson, ‘On the logic of theory change: Contraction functions and their associated revision functions’, Theoria 48 (1982), 14–37.

    Google Scholar 

  3. AlchourrónCarlos E. and DavidMakinson, ‘On the logic of theory change: Safe contraction’, Studia Logica 44 (1985), 405–422.

    Google Scholar 

  4. GärdenforsPeter, ‘Conditionals and changes of belief’, Acta Philosophica Fennica 30 (1978), 381–404.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gärdenfors, Peter, ‘Rules for rational changes of belief’, in T. Pauli (ed.), 320311: Philosophical Essays Dedicated to Lennart Aqvist on his Fiftieth Birthday, Philosophical Studies No. 34, Department of Philosophy, University of Uppsala, 1982, 88–101.

  6. MakinsonDavid, ‘How to give it up: A survey of some formal aspects of the logic of theory change’, Synthese 62 (1985), 347–363 and 68 (1986), 185–186.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Les Etangs B2, La Ronce, 92410, Ville d'Avray, France

    David Makinson

Authors
  1. David Makinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Makinson, D. On the status of the postulate of recovery in the logic of theory change. J Philos Logic 16, 383–394 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00431184

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00431184

Keywords

Search

Navigation