Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T01:28:08.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Dialectics of Enlightenment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2013

William Maker
William Maker*
Affiliation:
Clemson University
Get access

Abstract

In 1807 Hegel published the Phenomenology of Spirit which calmly asserted that philosophy had, at long last, ceased to be merely the love of knowing and had finally consummated its lust for truth, giving birth to ‘strenge Wissenschaft’ in logic and the system (Hegel, 1807: 3). In 1944, Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno circulated mimeographed copies of Dialectic of Enlightenment, ominously asserting that the same process of reason's self-clarification which Hegel described brings us, not, as he claimed, to truth and freedom, but to barbarism. Somehow critical reflection's efforts to liberate humanity from superstition, darkness, and oppression has lead instead to Auschwitz.

A crucial aspect of Horkheimer and Adorno's critique of enlightenment is the notion that enlightenment and its seeming antithesis, myth, are inextricably linked. In the Phenomenology Hegel had already investigated the underlying link between the rationality of the Enlightenment period and faith, its ostensible arational other, in Chapter VI. In various places Horkheimer and Adorno acknowledge the influence of Hegel, and they make suggestive passing references to the Phenomenology. Obviously, their connecting of enlightenment and myth bears more than a family resemblance to Hegel's pairing of enlightenment and faith. Just as Hegel disclosed that enlightenment and faith have more in common than usually thought, Horkheimer and Adorno aim to show that there is an important aspect of enlightenment already in myth and further, that enlightenment has itself fallen back into the essential features of myth it purports to be have overcome.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , Autumn/Winter 2012 , pp. 54 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T.W. (1964) The Jargon of Authenticity, Tarnowski, K. and Will, F.. trans., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973.Google Scholar
Adorno, T.W. (1966) Negative Dialectics. Ashton, E.B., trans., London: Routledge, 1973.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. (1987) The Fate of Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla (1986) Critique, Norm, and Utopia. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Di Giovanni, George, (2005) Freedom and Religion in Kant and His Immediate Successors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1807) Phenomenology of Spirit. Miller, A.V., trans. [1977]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1812) Science of Logic. Miller, A.V., trans. [1969]. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd. Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W. F. (1827–1831) Political Writings. Dickey, L. and Nisbet, H.B, eds. [1999]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1832), The Philosophy of History. Sibree, J., trans. New York: Dover Publications, 1956.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, T. W. (1947) Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, Jephcott, E., trans. Noerr, G.S ed. [2002]. Stanford: Standford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1739) A Treatise of Human Nature, Selby-Bigge, L.A., ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1888.Google Scholar
Jacobi, F. H. (1812) Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi's Werke, Koppen, J.F. and Roth, C.J.F., eds. [1968] Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Maker, William, (1994) Philosophy Without Foundations: Rethinking Hegel. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Maker, William (1998) ‘The Very Idea of the Idea of Nature, Or Why Hegel Is Not an Idealist’ Houlgate, S., ed. Hegel and the Philosophy of Nature. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Maker, William (2007) ‘Identity, Difference and the Logic of Otherness,’ in Grier, P., ed. Identity and Difference. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Maker, William (2009) ‘The End of History and the Nihilism of Becoming’, in Dudley, I. E., ed., Hegel and History. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, James (1998) ‘Language, Mythology, and Enlightenment: Historical Notes on Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment,’ Social Research, 65/4.Google Scholar
Wellmer, Albrecht (1969) Critical Theory of Society. Cumming, J trans., New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Wellmer, Albrecht (1991) The Persistance of Modernity, Cambridge: MIT Press,.Google Scholar
Wiggershaus, Rolf (1986) The Frankfurt School: Its History, Theories, and Political Significance. Robertson, M., trans. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar